Five of swords

Without law enforcement I would just kill you and take your stuff. That would be theft. And it would be the opposite of socialism, which pays for law enforcement.

The father of quantum physics, werner heisenberg, supported Hitler. One of the greatest American poets, Ezra pound, supported Hitler and was imprisoned for it. Aristides probably never even heard of these people. He just assumes that anyone who supports Hitler is uneducated because he saw that in movies.

Just books dude. Clearly this is a subject you only know about from hollywood.

I never watched fox. I just know history. None of hitlers attacks were unprovoked.

This is simply false.

I can assure you the usa will not last forever.

Hitler never forced Christianity or marriage on anyone. That isn't fascism. If Trump was fascist he would make schools and Healthcare paid for by the government. Stuff like that.

There are no professionals anymore with an iq over 60

Then you should not claim that he did explicitly say something that he did not. Your problem, not his.

It's true that enslaving blacks was good for the overall economy. Maybe we should repeal the 14th.

But you did clearly state that he clearly stated it....then quickly you clearly stated he never clearly states anything. So the only person here who can possibly be wrong is you.

Not really. Feeling an allegiance to another country is irrelevant to 'subject to the jurisdiction of'. Obviously people are subject to us jurisdiction if you, for example, intend to deport them...And there is already precedent set in the interpretation with that Chinese guy.

And yet I am astonishingly rational. Yes...the usa is the primary enemy of white people. Thus I want the usa to be destroyed. What is irrational about that?

If that were true you wouldn't bother commenting on it.

If you are worried about what I pin my happiness on then you are not engaged in politics.

I think the past few decades proved that we did not reach the end of history. Indeed this is now a multipolar world. And when countries compete over global hegemony, opportunities abound.

That has been the case since white people lost ww2, of course. But anything that simply destabilizes the us regime is good for me in the long run...and on that front there is plenty to celebrate.

So they were never going to actually occupy territory of the uk or of the usa. They were fighting a 100% defensive war and simply hoping these global powers would get tired of death and destruction. And indeed Hitler was always aware that his adversary was never countries...it was a 'rootless international clique' that he mentioned in his most famous speech. He always knew western powers were going to make war with him despite this not being in the interests of the British or American citizens...in fact radically opposed to their interests...because this is how global monies elite operate. They don't mind sacrificing British and American lives for their own interests because they fundamentally are not British or american.

And bear in mind that during the entire war Germany never even attempted to build a single aircraft carrier.

The usa should simply release its most dangerous criminals and smuggle them into columbia.

Uh...Hitler declared war on the usa after the usa declared war on Japan. Relief? This was just acknowledgement that Japan and Hitler had a military alliance. Anything else would be retarded. Meanwhile...when was the lend lease deal? Hitler actually showed remarkable restraint in not declaring war earlier.

Left and right are just directions and are politically useless. However, people who self identify as leftist do tend to understand the political relevance of a collective...or stated more plainly.. they understand what politics is. People who self identify as right wing tend to have no idea what politics is and instead confuse politics with their own personal arbitrary ethical constructs...with little concern about questions relating to cause and effect. People who think of themselves as left wing, therefore, do tend to be more capable of comprehending political realities and thus are more likely to become national socialists imo, since I believe national socialism is the ideal political paradigm. This also does have empirical support considering the majority of the nsdap was made up of people who had been supporters of communism at some point.

Walt Disney is never given enough credit for helping to create triumph of the will IMHO. But that is why Disney has to be homosexual these days...jewish resentment. Anyway...is mosely the only name you recognized? Any response to my point? I didn't think so.

Propaganda movies are a poor source of historical knowledge, of course. I would instead suggest authors such as Oswald mosely, David Irving, sean mcmeekam, or pat Buchanan for this particular subject. I will say, however, that I watched some natsoc films and I find them far superior to Hollywood films in both artistry and intellectual merit. Recently I watched the natsoc version of the 'adventures of baron munchausen' and a quasi billion character was suggesting to the baron a plan involving conquering poland...which was clearly portrayed as a crude and barbaric thing to do. You and the other normie here would have a hard time explaining why a natsoc propaganda film would suggest conquest is barbaric...but I can explain that easily.

I would certainly agree...but you don't even have that much education