User

So, where is the section about Alito flying a flag?

Which part of that says a SCOTUS wife can't engage in any kind of politics, like raising a flag? That a SCOTUS can't fly a historical flag? I can read just fine. Can you?

What an utterly disingenuous point. Biden was investigated; he did break the law, but they decided not to charge him because he was a nice old man who couldn't remember anything.

And? If you are so concerned with character, stop doing and saying anything to oppose him regardless of how false it is.

His wife's? There is no rule against Supreme Court Justices being political. Nor do their family members have to abstain from politics. They are people, they register to vote, they register with parties, they still do ordinary people stuff.

I love how folks on the left are just pretending like the summer of BLM violence never happened, nor did this violence start back in 2013 that they have continually encouraged and "incited" ever since.

You provided a quote from Wikipedia... that provides for a "source" what appears to be some random persons college research paper in pdf format and a bunch of Russian links. Where exactly is this agreement that we made that we are now lying, back-stabbing, or reneging on? No Wikipedia, not random links, lets see you provide a real source and what part of that source supports you here. I mean seriously, you have to know what you did here was beyond dishonest... right? Yeah, you "work" really hard to find whatever obscure "source" you can find that still doesn't support what you claim... Your arguments here support him. You are literally pushing Russian propaganda that NATO made some kind of deal to never expand. You don't have to say you support Putin, you are here supporting him. Which "lands?" The Battlefield has been moving daily. Ukraine takes back land throughout the war. Did you forget how far Russia initially pushed and then had to fall back? I can't say for certain how much Ukraine will retake, many factors can go into that, but it is certainly within the realm of reason that Russia can determine this war has cost them too much for too long and they will keep retreating to a point they find they can defend satisfactorily. Ukraine may still yet retake much of the Donbas... Crimea much less likely. This is why your arguments are duplicitous and I say you support Putin. You sit here repeatedly saying Ukraine must make peace... but you refuse to support them. You are here outright saying you are fine with Russia negotiating from a position of strength. If we abandon Ukraine, there is no peace deal, there is only conquest. Putin is not going to be like, Oh look, NATO abandoned Ukraine, I guess I will stop now. You mock the Ukrainians. Seriously, stop pretending like you don't understand why I keep saying you support Putin and Russia. You clearly and obviously do.

Again, these are violent crimes across the board, and many happen without guns.

A. Just saying false doesn't make it so. Your comment about running a red light doesn't make what I said false. Also, his running a red light was basically a rolling stop on a right-hand turn. It's something 99% of everyone in the world does when making right turns... B. Foster was part of an illegal protest blocking the streets, which stopped Perry from freely traveling. C. And a Pardon Board and Governor pardoned him. My point was quite simple and still true: When the left supports lawlessness in the streets like this, be prepared for the consequences. When you participate in lawlessness like this, carrying a rifle in a threatening way... be prepared for the consequences. Maybe... maybe not. There are plenty of videos of violent mobs of people surrounding cars and dragging the driver out and beating them.

So, instead of dealing with the dishonest statement you made here about him talking like a Nazi, you string together a rambling incoherent string of more dishonesty. Lets pick one of the things you said: "he will be a dictator on day one" No, he said he would only be a dictator on day one. He also said explicitly why, regarding closing the border and drilling for oil. Clearly, he was talking about using his executive authority. This notion that he was somehow going to declare himself a dictator literally is a lie, and there is no realistic path to any such thing anyhow. It is just fear-mongering nonsense.

Still can't be honest here... or is it ignorance? Let me know which. I can help you with the ignorance, not so much with the integrity.

No fiction. No excuse. Just a reality. The left wants to push this lawlessness in the streets, these are the kinds of consequences that happen. These "protestors" angrily surrounded and stopped this guy in his car, one of them open carrying a rifle coming at him in a threatening manner. Right or wrong, the guy is dead because he was illegally detaining someone with a rifle in a threatening manner.

Violent crime across the board is higher here, guns or no guns.

Democrats cheer on the lawlessness in the streets. These are the consequences.

And yet you are in this thread lying to support your saying Gore did not lose.

No, people intent on killing others still do so.

No, as we have already established, violence, violent crime, and murder all still exist with or without guns.

Constructive? Self-defense is about as constructive as it gets. That was not my logic anyhow. I clearly stated a lawful product being used lawfully as the base of my argument. Guns are a lawful product used lawfully by almost half of all households in this country. The fact that bad people, do bad things, and illegally take those guns across the border is on them, not the gun manufacturers.

The facts on their face do not back you up at all. If Israel were simply indiscriminately killing people, there would be a whole lot more than 30K dead... I am not gullible, but you certainly are not being honest here.

Accidents in vehicles are a greater threat to people dying... when you are comparing firearm deaths to vehicle deaths as you were trying to do. No, if drugs were lawful in Mexico, then they would be lawful in Mexico. That doesn't make it "OK" to smuggle them into the US, but it is the smugglers who are in the wrong for doing wrong, not the drug companies for producing a legal product that is used lawfully.

You claimed that 50% more people are killed by firearms than by vehicles. To get that number you are including all firearm deaths, not just homicides. That is why I responded about suicides. If you are only looking at firearm intentional homicide rates, then driving a car is more dangerous as I pointed out, especially if you factor in the other factors around firearm deaths. Killing people with a truck is easy. Killing people a hundred different ways is easy. Guns are a lawful product that are used for lawful purposes. The fact that criminals obtain them illegally or even lawfully and then illegally take them to Mexico is not the fault of gun manufacturers. Unless it is also the fault of spoon makers that people are fat...

1. We have come full circle now... if you trust your security employees now, then you have changed your position on just letting people "protest" 2. There is no irony. If you want lawlessness, then you will get it. Oh, no response on what you would do if someone broke your windows and sat in your home blocking you? Figures. What is funny is that in the same post you ask me about vigilantism, you also act like there is nothing more to discuss. It seems this is your go-to schtick when your ideas are challenged to the point you can no longer justify/defend them. I do not support vigilantism in the true meaning of the word. Vigilantism has at its heart that you have set out to enforce your version of "justice" on people doing wrong. If you are just trying to get your wife to the Hospital and some dumb "protestor" is in your way, moving them out of your way is not vigilantism.

Ignoring the rest of your tirade... to the point of this thread, no, he was not talking like a Nazi. This is how it works with you guys, you just push a lie and then continue to distort it to no end. I would think, for someone as outraged about Trump's Character as you are here, you might be more concerned with your own integrity on what you accuse him of.

I did not say that it said that. You are making a strawman argument now. You know you can't win this discussion based on the facts, so you play these dumb games instead. Hamas depends on dishonest arguments like yours. Good job supporting them in their rape, torture, murder, and hostage-taking. Again, you tried to act like it never happened at all. I only need one example to show you how ignorant you are.

1. If you are going to "accept" the lawlessness in protesting that impacts other's travel, then be prepared for the consequences when people tire of the law not being enforced and take matters into their own hands. 2. Well, what you are willing to "accept" or not here is meaningless, as others will not be willing to "accept" people blocking their paths and law enforcement doing nothing. 3. Violence is a tool used by police to enforce the law on those who resist. Yes, if a trespasser refuses to leave and refuses lawful commands to leave, I 100% support "violence" in the escalation of force needed to remove them. I have a feeling if someone breaks the windows into your home, then comes inside and stands in the doorway to your kitchen or bathroom or bedroom and refuses to move, you are going to call the police and expect them to enforce some laws. If not, feel free to post your home address here...