User

Yes, by illegally protesting in the streets. They certainly did stop him. It is a road, meant for driving on. He was forced to stop because those people illegally taking over the streets were in his way. There is some video, and you can see after he comes to a stop, many in the crowd start running to swarm the vehicle, including Foster, who approaches him with a gun. Had they simply walked on past him and left him be, none of this would have ever happened. Had Foster simply walked on by and let him be, none of this would have ever happened. These are facts, trying to insult me doesn't make your case any better.

Is this a joke? "No formal deal was struck" There is either a deal or there isn't a deal. Talk about a deal doesn't equal a deal. There are no lies, there is no dishonor. There was no deal.

Where was a ruling not impartial? You have jumped a long way from a judges wife flying a flag to claiming they are not being impartial in their rulings.

Politicians? Which one was a mere politician? Everyone appointed had a career in law, as a judge before this. You clearly do not understand the meaning of "stack" the court. Replacing existing justices through the existing legal mechanisms is not "stacking" the court. Expanding the court and increasing its size in one go, beyond existing legal frameworks and norms to "stack" the court is stacking the court.

The SCOTUS is not supposed to be political in its rulings. Its members are still people with families who participate in the normalcy of life and the world. There is no such absurd expectation that a family member can never engage in politics or merely flying a flag. I wonder, were you this outraged when RBG was outright attacking Trump in her public speech during the 2016 election?

The only wishful thinking I am guilty of being wrong about here was expecting you to respond directly to the things I say or provide some objective evidence to back up the garbage you assert. So, no real source for how NATO promised Russia no expansion?

The fact that he ran a red light (again, what amounted to a rolling stop on a right-hand turn) and was then stopped by the crowd... does not preclude the fact that the crowd then angrily surrounded his car, including Foster, who approached him with a gun. My description of events is accurate. What I said was quite clear: "When the left supports lawlessness in the streets like this, be prepared for the consequences. When you participate in lawlessness like this, carrying a rifle in a threatening way... be prepared for the consequences. "

I get it, you don't like guns, but this is just silly nonsense now. There are plenty of laws regarding guns that preclude gunfights in the streets over any dumb excuse...

You cited rules... where do any of them apply to this situation?

So, where is the section about Alito flying a flag?

Which part of that says a SCOTUS wife can't engage in any kind of politics, like raising a flag? That a SCOTUS can't fly a historical flag? I can read just fine. Can you?

What an utterly disingenuous point. Biden was investigated; he did break the law, but they decided not to charge him because he was a nice old man who couldn't remember anything.

And? If you are so concerned with character, stop doing and saying anything to oppose him regardless of how false it is.

His wife's? There is no rule against Supreme Court Justices being political. Nor do their family members have to abstain from politics. They are people, they register to vote, they register with parties, they still do ordinary people stuff.

I love how folks on the left are just pretending like the summer of BLM violence never happened, nor did this violence start back in 2013 that they have continually encouraged and "incited" ever since.

You provided a quote from Wikipedia... that provides for a "source" what appears to be some random persons college research paper in pdf format and a bunch of Russian links. Where exactly is this agreement that we made that we are now lying, back-stabbing, or reneging on? No Wikipedia, not random links, lets see you provide a real source and what part of that source supports you here. I mean seriously, you have to know what you did here was beyond dishonest... right? Yeah, you "work" really hard to find whatever obscure "source" you can find that still doesn't support what you claim... Your arguments here support him. You are literally pushing Russian propaganda that NATO made some kind of deal to never expand. You don't have to say you support Putin, you are here supporting him. Which "lands?" The Battlefield has been moving daily. Ukraine takes back land throughout the war. Did you forget how far Russia initially pushed and then had to fall back? I can't say for certain how much Ukraine will retake, many factors can go into that, but it is certainly within the realm of reason that Russia can determine this war has cost them too much for too long and they will keep retreating to a point they find they can defend satisfactorily. Ukraine may still yet retake much of the Donbas... Crimea much less likely. This is why your arguments are duplicitous and I say you support Putin. You sit here repeatedly saying Ukraine must make peace... but you refuse to support them. You are here outright saying you are fine with Russia negotiating from a position of strength. If we abandon Ukraine, there is no peace deal, there is only conquest. Putin is not going to be like, Oh look, NATO abandoned Ukraine, I guess I will stop now. You mock the Ukrainians. Seriously, stop pretending like you don't understand why I keep saying you support Putin and Russia. You clearly and obviously do.

Again, these are violent crimes across the board, and many happen without guns.

A. Just saying false doesn't make it so. Your comment about running a red light doesn't make what I said false. Also, his running a red light was basically a rolling stop on a right-hand turn. It's something 99% of everyone in the world does when making right turns... B. Foster was part of an illegal protest blocking the streets, which stopped Perry from freely traveling. C. And a Pardon Board and Governor pardoned him. My point was quite simple and still true: When the left supports lawlessness in the streets like this, be prepared for the consequences. When you participate in lawlessness like this, carrying a rifle in a threatening way... be prepared for the consequences. Maybe... maybe not. There are plenty of videos of violent mobs of people surrounding cars and dragging the driver out and beating them.

So, instead of dealing with the dishonest statement you made here about him talking like a Nazi, you string together a rambling incoherent string of more dishonesty. Lets pick one of the things you said: "he will be a dictator on day one" No, he said he would only be a dictator on day one. He also said explicitly why, regarding closing the border and drilling for oil. Clearly, he was talking about using his executive authority. This notion that he was somehow going to declare himself a dictator literally is a lie, and there is no realistic path to any such thing anyhow. It is just fear-mongering nonsense.

Still can't be honest here... or is it ignorance? Let me know which. I can help you with the ignorance, not so much with the integrity.

No fiction. No excuse. Just a reality. The left wants to push this lawlessness in the streets, these are the kinds of consequences that happen. These "protestors" angrily surrounded and stopped this guy in his car, one of them open carrying a rifle coming at him in a threatening manner. Right or wrong, the guy is dead because he was illegally detaining someone with a rifle in a threatening manner.

Violent crime across the board is higher here, guns or no guns.

Democrats cheer on the lawlessness in the streets. These are the consequences.

And yet you are in this thread lying to support your saying Gore did not lose.

No, people intent on killing others still do so.