User

Clearly I do, as you have ignored it repeatedly when I have pointed it out to you. This is just a quick summary and not a comprehensive list of all the physical evidence associated with all of these things: They have investigator reports after WWII reviewing this site. We have years of archeological digs that have unearthed the Nazi structures. We have the physical evidence of the train station, tracks, graves, bones, ash, the way the earth has settled, and where bodies were buried, all corroborating the witness testimony to all of this.

LOL. Its amazing now that Biden is out, you guys start caring about how old candidates are or what their health is. JD Vance is just as qualified as Obama ever was.

There is zero offense in stating or repeating objective facts. Harris had an affair with Willie Brown, a man 30 years older than she was, while she was having that affair he put her on a commission and board.

Obviously not, based on why you posted it and your response once this was pointed out to you. No, it is weird that you cite a source that you would then turn around and denounce. There is physical evidence, I have outlined this to you many times now. Repeating yourself doesn't make it true or discount what I have provided.

Not quite that simple. The Elections Clause of our Constitution divides these powers and I am no expert on the many SCOTUS rulings since then that define the boundaries of what each can do.

This was a softball man. All you have to do is say it is wrong to attack police like this and to destroy memorials.

I doubt most of the world even pays attention to that nuance in American elections.

His SOP. Lie, run away, or question the source.

LOL, so you provided a source that you do not even believe to be true. Brilliant. Almost as bad as when you tried to provide a source to back your claim that there were not gas chambers because they lacked blue walls, but you didn't actually read it and see that it explained how they were in fact gas chambers.

Oh, so you believe these experts when they say: "The Nazis used a variety of camps throughout their time in power to persecute, control and, eventually, murder their opponents." ... "Approximately one million people died in concentration camps over the course of the Holocaust. This figure does not include those killed at extermination camps."

No, once again, you presume something that could have many different meanings. In this instance, I am mocking you. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-kamala-harrisandwillie-brownhad-a-relationshipover-adecadeafte-idUSKBN26Y2RJ/ "Kamala Harris did have a relationship with Willie Brown, who later served as San Francisco’s mayor, between 1994 and 1995 ( here Los Angeles Times first linked the pair in 1994 ( here her career in the Alameda County District Attorney's Office ( here 29 and Brown, speaker of the California State Assembly ( here;), was 60 ( here;..."

It is not unsubstantiated that Harris was having an affair with Willie Brown and during this time Willie Brown appointed her to board/commission. Those are facts.

No, I am quite genuine when I point out that Harris slept her way into her career with a married man 30 years older than her that just happened to appoint her to boards and commissions. I am sure it was all because she was "highly intelligent" and not just sleeping with him. *wink* *wink*

Yes, same difference. You are playing stupid semantics games to make some kind of dishonest point. It doesn't matter if I call it a concentration camp or a death camp or an extermination camp - the point remains the same, Jews were sent there to be killed. Just like Jews were killed in the gas chamber you lied trying to call it a delousing chamber as if they were not killed by gas inside. This is all just some dumb game for you.

Same difference. Just like the game you played when you tried to claim the gas chamber used to kill Jews was not a gas chamber.

Oh no, I think you are being "highly intelligent" here. It is "your side" that slept their way up the chain... speaking of being pigs. That was the subject here.

I am sure our DOJ will be using this video to hunt down this person and prosecute him. Nothing to see here:

It is relevant to thinking you care one bit about honesty or intelligent discussion here. You are "highly talented" in that regard.

Is a train station the only thing I said? No. When we are talking about moving Jews into concentration camps via... checks notes... trains, well, guess what, having those is certainly part of the evidence for how the Nazi's moved so many Jews as claimed. You continue to be dishonest.

judging the many other discussions we have had, you don't seem to care much about being a liar nor have you shown any real ability to discuss things intelligently.

That is not what I said though. "What exactly was the innuendo there? That can be read half a dozen different ways. "

I see, so you have no further comments other than to think about my junk. Got it.

What exactly was the innuendo there? That can be read half a dozen different ways. I see you are real concerned about that kind of language since you are now thinking about my junk and proclaiming that on the internet for folks to see...

Again: They have investigator reports after WWII reviewing this site. We have years of archeological digs that have unearthed the Nazi structures. We have the physical evidence of the train station, tracks, graves, bones, ash, the way the earth has settled, and where bodies were buried, all corroborating the witness testimony to all of this.

Is your schtick an act?