User

You had an argument? I get it, you are into dudes with fake vaginas. Most men do find that disgusting. Nothing wrong with each of us having our own personal attractions.

How cute. Look at you refering to the dudes as transwomen. I bet they love you for that. I can see why this is upsetting for you. If only he had a fake vagina, then you would be into him.

Well, even this is a specious argument. Project 2025 is like 800 pages long covering a wide variety of subject and topics. There might be some overlap that naturally occurs, but to the point of this thread, there is no association between Trump and Project 2025. It is also comical that you are criticizing Trump as not Conservative when his record is far more Conservative than from what I have seen of yours here...

Of course it is about you, as you seem to have a problem discerning sex and no issues with dudes pretending to be women as you are here making that case that you can't tell.

How does that make them suspect? The fact that Trump and Conservatives and Republicans in general know and collaborate with the organization and its members, because we all have shared common goals and policies, doesn't then mean Trump had anything to do with Project 2025. Seriously, you claim to be a Conservative, you follow Americna politics and are here frequently commenting on them, so you knew about Project 2025 development and support it too, right? Right? Guilt by association, no?

I am not interested in your sexual fetish with dudes. Move on.

So do you. Doesn't seem like it. You can't even agree on showing a woman an ultrasound because *GASP* she might choose not to get an abortion. You are against there being any shame... No you don't.

Go practice figuring this stuff out on your own. I can't help you.

Rank bigotry? Are you not proud of sleeping with a dude with a fake vagina?

ROFL, yeah, good luck with that. You speaking from experience? Women can wear strap-ons too...

LOL, this is my question, only not honest. The issue is not if you would stop before taking "her" home, it is if you are going to go ahead and have anal sex with him when you find out its a dude. I guess we know you will. Right?

LOL, that is because 99%+ of the time when an unborn child on an ultrasound has a penis it is a boy and a vagina it is a girl. It is amazing the lengths of obfuscation and lies you folks will go to for your gender identity madness.

No, it is a very smart balance of powers. It keeps a balance between the Federal Government and State Governments. We are the UNITED STATES of America. The President doesn't just represent a direct popular vote because of this. The only reason folks on the left hate it is because, boo hoo, Clinton and Gore did not win it but did win the popular vote.

Wait... what? That is not a failure of science. That is like saying because a kid starved to death in Africa because a truck broke down carrying the food, we can't trust food to nourish us anymore. This makes no sense at all.

You are still pushing this BS? You have to hide from me because I have already repeatedly destroyed these ignorant arguments from you and you don't have enough courage to face me anymore because you lack the integrity.

Make up your mind. Now you want to talk about religion?

Are you not aware of the history of the United States or the writings explaining these things?

This is like complaining about how Chess favors intellectuals more than Checkers.

Did you mindlessly copy and paste that from the Harris campaign? You are being lied to and you don't even care.

What is freedom of religion if not freedom of speech? You can't support freedom of speech and think you can destroy freedom of religion. Every aspect of how someone practices religion is speech. This is why freedom of speech, press, and religion are all together in our Bill of Rights.

How have I not been open? See, instead of responding to what I say, you have to steer this discussion to absurdly mischaracterizing what I am doing. Never mind half the other lines of bad argument you have abandoned on here.

Why are you still here? Shouldn't you be off hiding from religion somewhere else?

You sit here sharing links to a site that celebrates freedom of speech, free from censorship, while you condemn freedom of religion. The two rights go together hand and hand. You can't celebrate freedom of speech and champion freedom of speech and not freedom of religion. You are also conflating breaking laws, like rape and murder... that have nothing to do with freedom of religion.

No, hard to fall flat on her face when she is hiding from any adversarial questions... well, any journalism at all and is not going off teleprompter to any large degree.

Thanks for confirming again you have no interest in honest discussion here.