-
Posts
15,153 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
51
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by User
-
Zuckerberg admits censorship.
User replied to CouchPotato's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Looks like a bunch of folks have reviewed the book and pointed out its flaws. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Real_Anthony_Fauci -
Zuckerberg admits censorship.
User replied to CouchPotato's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
That is not what I said. I don't worship Fauci, I think he is a liar and told one of the worst most damning lies of my lifetime. Well, you can start with answering any of my specific questions... that is what is left to discuss. You seem to have a very particular bent against the pandemic response and the COVID vaccine... but your arguments go farther than that. You could start by directly engaging with me... offering specifics. I just tore apart your silly post on NYC pandemic stuff. -
Zuckerberg admits censorship.
User replied to CouchPotato's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
I am not asking you to educate me here as much as I am asking you to offer even a bare defense of what you assert. Its funny how you have all this time to spam the forum with these claims, but when asked to support them... now you don't have the time. I have a long list of books to read. Anything on Fauci is going to be years away. I am not here defending him anyhow... -
Zuckerberg admits censorship.
User replied to CouchPotato's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
So, now you are playing the vague game of dismissing all my sources without explaining why or what specifically was wrong. -
That is on the margins... so what will you do when the next school shooting happens? Shrug your shoulders... oh well, I guess they didn't read our magical sign again.
-
Zuckerberg admits censorship.
User replied to CouchPotato's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
So, you think every vaccine on the schedule today is dangerous and only there / approved because of corruption? And this is where you tell me you are not anti-vaccine... right? LOL You won't give me any information to reject. You offer little more than vague generalizations. -
Zuckerberg admits censorship.
User replied to CouchPotato's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
So... you think some vaccines are dangerous, that they were produced and approved through a system of corruption... but you are not willing to tell us which ones? What kind of a monster are you? You want people to die and take deadly vaccines while you tell them to go figure it out for themselves? None of this makes any sense. You are on here arguing about the corruption, but won't give specifics. Hell, just give me vaccine, not the COVID one, that you think is dangerous and was only approved through corruption. Name one. -
Zuckerberg admits censorship.
User replied to CouchPotato's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Um... there were more than 20K who died from COVID in NYC. They went to mass graves, to funeral homes, to graveyards... just like other bodies do. It was an intense effort, widely reported on at the time: https://www.ft.com/content/193a5792-10ef-4b3c-82e0-298c2180ba9c -
Zuckerberg admits censorship.
User replied to CouchPotato's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
That is exactly what I am trying to do. You are here presenting information and I am trying to seek the truth behind the surface. Um... https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/07/us/new-york-coronavirus-victims-refrigerated-trucks/index.html This is a bit of a half truth. Yes, many field hospitals were never used and those that were not to their full capacity... thank goodness. These were precautions to try to stay ahead of any demand. However, some were in fact used. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/06/photos-show-patients-arriving-at-the-javits-center-field-hospital-in-new-york-city.html That was not the only Hospital in the news, nor did others sit empty. There were certainly others nearby that had space and capacity while Elmhurts was full, but that was due to it being a network of indepent Hospitals all governed by different organizations. It was a matter of a lack of coordination early on that they worked through as the pandemic progressed. So... what is your point with all this? Are you trying to say the pandemic didn't happen or something? https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/30/us/brooklyn-hospital-coronavirus-patients-deaths/index.html -
Zuckerberg admits censorship.
User replied to CouchPotato's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
This is a lot of generalization. "Big Pharma" "They" There are more drugs out there than you or I could ever review in a lifetime, what percentage of them are "dangerous" and were approved solely on "Pharma's claims" they are safe? You are trying to portray this as some kind of systemic problem, but are not quantifying it. I care deeply about corruption, but what I do not care about is what appears to be your vague attack on vaccines through this broad generalization about corruption. You are hiding behind all of this instead of directly answering, exactly which vaccines on the schedule do you disagree with and why? Exactly which one of the vaccines on the schedule do you think are dangerous and were only there because of corruption? You won't directly answer, you won't give specifics. OK, which ones? What do you define as "little" here and what testing is it you demand more of and why? Do you think any of the current vaccines are dangerous and should be avoided? Let's see your specifics. But... you are doing so indirectly. You are attacking the entire industry as corrupt. So, which vaccines on the schedule are bad? Be specific. Which vaccines on the schedule do you think are good? The list is not that long, should be pretty easy for you to do. Oh no, I want to hear your specifics. I am not asleep here at all. In fact, this is one of my top 5 things I have researched and love discussing. -
And when someone still shows up with a gun to your magical gun-free zones...
-
Again, you are having trouble here... "Separation of Powers. The Executive appoints the Judiciary with Senate Confirmation. The people can elect both the Executive and Senate. Congress can impeach the judiciary. States and Congress can pass Amendments to the Constitution. There is not closed exclusive access to the Constitution. This stuff is taught in grade school for crying out loud. This is basic civics."
-
Yes, this is your perception of some fear that you are not even here to understand. They go through a lot of fire drills too, doesn't mean they live in constant fear of dying in a fire... You mean your delusions? Democrats are the ones who insist on the "magic" of gun-free zones. You tell us why that is not working here. Did the shooter miss the sign saying no guns allowed?
-
Those are not the two options. Again... "Separation of Powers. The Executive appoints the Judiciary with Senate Confirmation. The people can elect both the Executive and Senate. Congress can impeach the judiciary. States and Congress can pass Amendments to the Constitution. There is not closed exclusive access to the Constitution. This stuff is taught in grade school for crying out loud. This is basic civics." Again, you are having trouble here... "Separation of Powers. The Executive appoints the Judiciary with Senate Confirmation. The people can elect both the Executive and Senate. Congress can impeach the judiciary. States and Congress can pass Amendments to the Constitution. There is not closed exclusive access to the Constitution. This stuff is taught in grade school for crying out loud. This is basic civics."
-
You were talking about your fear.
-
I am not the one on here talking about how fearful I am, you are. So, make up your mind.
-
That is on you. I just gave you the stats that your kids are more likely to die in the car/bus traveling to/from school than any shootings... Besides, why are you afraid when they are safe and protected by the no-gun signs?
-
So, why do you keep saying stuff like this: "Fearing for the lives of your children every time they go to school is the opposite of being free."
-
Donalds family history of dementia
User replied to CrakHoBarbie's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
This is 2024, not 2020. It's telling that you feel compelled to go that far back instead of dealing with Biden now. -
Donalds family history of dementia
User replied to CrakHoBarbie's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Nice dodge. Biden is the one who had to drop out of the race because he could barely stand up for a debate. -
Donalds family history of dementia
User replied to CrakHoBarbie's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Sure, and you played it off as if it was cool that he is as bad off as he is because he is not the candidate anymore... -
Donalds family history of dementia
User replied to CrakHoBarbie's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
He is still the President! OMG -
So-called science has repeatedly erred in making false claims.
User replied to blackbird's topic in Religion & Politics
This can't be a real question. Are you really this ignorant of The Bible or are you really trying this hard to be obtuse about it? -
And this is why you hide from me like the coward you are... because you post garbage like this and know I will call you out for it. Trump did not sign a bill. He reversed an 11th hour rule change Obama put in just before he left office, one that almost certainly would have failed in court anyhow. Obama said that anyone who was getting a Social Security check for mental illness or those deemed unfit to manage their financial affairs would have their names added to the NICS database to prevent them from buying guns. No due process, just a dumb rule change Obama threw out as he was leaving office.
