User

Oh, I see. So, if you are "Pro-Choice" then you must also support choice in all things... like school choice? Or maybe, the terminology is in regard to abortion and the status of the unborn child being a human life with a right to life. Did you already forget your big speech about kindness and tolerance and respect? You want everyone else to play along with a persons fantasy role play trying to be something they are not... but you can't even do the same here yourself. No, it is not even a matter of just not being exclusive. We are talking about significant spreads. About 50/50 Men women... etc...

This is a parable. I’m taking it as it was meant. Even taking it literally as you insist, all it does is completely disagree with everything you have previously argued. These people were paid a wage. That isn’t a gift economy at all. So now you are arguing for some kind of Christian theocracy where everyone’s wages are the same. And if you want to argue Christianity you are still woefully wrong about money, as there is no definitive position against money and in fact, we have the parable of the talents which flies in the face of what you are trying to argue.

You just love to change up the terminology like this, to build these little strawman responses like this one. I never said we should both stay out of teachers business. Public schools exist to teach a curriculum that is controlled by the public. Of course it is our business what is happening there, we are paying for it and we are hiring those teachers. No, what I very specifically said was that I oppose teachers pushing their politics onto kids, and to broaden that out some, generally schools as a whole should avoid steering into choosing sides or pushing particular political view points. LOL, for real? You can't muster up any courtesy here to refer to Pro-Life as Pro-Life and have to bring your bigoted snide remarks about religion into discussions routinely. You don't get to preach kindness and tolerance like you are on the high ground here. You are not, nor are the views you push. It has nothing to do with courtesy, it has everything to do with being honest and not playing a role in some kind of fantastical delusion. A biological male can't be a woman. Has nothing to do with what they want. I am stating objective facts here. You have no desire to respect truth here and you are the one demanding I and others partake in these fantasies. That is not tolerance, that is you and the Pride movement and the Pride flag pushing this onto others and demanding they succumb to your political ideology, then you have the gall to pretend like you are doing all this under a banner of how tolerant you are. Yessssssssssssssssssss. For all the same reasons you sit there typing away about how obvious it is to you that the Pro-Life flag is hostile as you claim... that is exactly the same sentiment others have towards the Pride flag. Which again, is exactly my point. Then you are going to pretend like there are not thug LGBTQ mafia folks out there pushing their rhetoric in hateful ways demanding compliance? LOL, look at you in this discussion, you can't even be at peace with my pointing out simple biological facts. Oh no. There are folks in the LGBTQ Pride movement who are just as hateful, full of spite, and full of intolerance shoving their views onto the world. We have come a long long way from gay people just trying to live a normal life. As before, if the message of loving the mother and the unborn child is a problem for you, the Pro-Life flag isn't the problem, you are. See, we can both play this silly game. So much for your acceptance and tolerance.

It is the Pro-Life movement, and my claim was not who was driving it but who identified as such. Gallop polls have consistently shown that the issue is spread across key demographics from race, sex, age, education, and even religious and non-religious. You care enough about your bigoted views on religious belief that you feel compelled to drag it up in several of our discussions now.

Actually, gifts are not bribes. Bribery has a very specific, nefarious meaning. Hanging out with your rich friend occasionally and having him pay the way is not a bribe.

So, you can't answer the questions and resort to random scripture instead. Is your argument that you want to impose a Christian theocracy on everyone now? I do not understand why you are quoting scripture. Never mind, the scripture you quoted has nothing to do with not having value to your labor. The point of this scripture here was that you should not be envious of what others get paid, or to the larger point, that God's gift of salvation is freely given to all regardless of when they seek it. That his followers may come young or old before they die. What does that have to do with a gift economy?

This is gibberish. If there is no way to calculate the value of your work... how does anyone know what they can afford? Just saying it depends on your choices and community is not an answer. How does that work?

LOL, come on indeed. Are you comparing the kind of warfare and eradication employed in Yugoslavia to Settlement disputes in Israel? At this pace, maybe in 10,000 years the West Bank will be "cleansed." *eye roll*

No one has bribed Thomas. What an outrageous accusation with no proof.

Of course it had to do with the quality of Roe. The Court had to reinvent tests for the lower courts to apply continually. Roe V Wade was never an absolute right to abortion anytime, anywhere, for any reason. So... again, it was poorly written, even by whatever absurdity you want to exist. Again, I am not interested in your religious bigotry and the issue of abortion is not so clearly divided. It actually spans a lot of demographics for those who are and are not Pro-Life/Pro-Choice. But I guess you feel better getting your little jabs at religion in...

What legal reasoning to you think will support such a law being found to be Constitutional? It's just more fear-mongering.

What am I ignoring? Be specific.

So, you believe she shot a puppy but then conveniently think she lied about the circumstances.

You continue with this false dilemma that we must choose porn or your SNM bondage classes for kids in K-12. You claim to be so concerned with porn, but you ignored my questions: Do you support legislation pushed by Republicans in various right leaning states to regulate online porn more to require age verification to help prevent kids from accessing it? Any other measures? Again, you are pushing YOUR values regarding what is a healthy sexual relationship and dismissing mine as prudish. My point here is that neither of us should be pushing our values regarding what is or is not a healthy sexual relationship onto children outside of basics like consent, safety, and consequences. You are the one being obtuse and quite frankly, disgustingly rude, with your mocking me about blow jobs while in the next sentence acting like you don't want to teach them about how to engage in (recreate) porn activities while you then flip back to a girl worrying about why her anus hurts because they did not use lube. Someone like you needs to be kept as far away from a classroom full of kids as possible. You have no business determining standards for what constitutes healthy sexual relationships or showing them how to do it. Then you wonder why folks think folks that are pushing crap like the PRIDE flag in the classroom have sexual deviant tendencies or there is some kind of sexual thing to it... that Venn diagram is starting to look an awful lot like a circle for your views on putting this smut into classrooms and your support for the PRIDE flag... No, I can't decide how people feel, but I can certainly point out objective facts. A biological male, who feels like a woman, pretends to look like one, act like one, is not actually one. That doesn't make me intolerant, it makes me a sane rational human being and your conflating that with intolerance is EXACTLY why the PRIDE flag has no place in the classroom, it is you shoving your political ideology onto kids. The PRIDE flag is just as much about superiority here to you, you have already admitted as much, as you assert that what it stands for must be accepted or those who do not are the intolerant ones! I already showed you what the Pro-Life flag stands for and you just fabricate things to oppose it. Nothing about it was superiority related. Where did the link I provided you say: "The pro-life (anti-choice) flag says that women should not have the right to choose whether to carry a fetus within them." It did not. You are just making this up. Which again, is exactly my point. You are here pushing your political views and trying to justify them and then dismissing mine. OR we just don't push our politics onto the kids... the classroom is not a soapbox for teachers or staff.

Trump, rightly, was still playing by the unwritten code of conduct. Once you are President, you don't continue to use your position to target your rival for prison. Biden was too old or too inept to disagree with his handlers on Trump. He would rather tear the country apart with this mess to "get Trump" and appease his radical base. Trump knows better now.

That is not the definition of ethnic cleansing. Name-calling doesn't make your arguments any better. I do know what apartheid is. In this case, it is just a left-wing, mindless talking point parroted by people who typically have no ability actually to articulate anything to support it.

It is likely even more nefarious. Jack Smith timed his indictments to where they essentially secured the nomination for Trump to win the primary, and now they are crying and fighting to try to fast-track it through before the election... to meddle there, too. Hoping it will keep Trump distracted and unable to campaign (Election Interference) and drown out the issues because the news cycle will be 24/7 Trump trial instead of Biden sucks. (More Election Interference). And they got a shot at locking Trump up, but at worst, they still had the Election Interference. Now it looks like they won't get the trial before the Election and the Democrats are just going bananas over it, including Jack Smith.

This is a bit duplicitous. Roe V Wade was an awful ruling, instead of dealing with that, you want to argue that because it was awful for so long, then we shouldn't change it. Again, Roe V Wade is what caused 50 years of political strife and issues. It was a never ending battle to try to push state laws that constantly had to be retested in the Courts with specious legal reasoning and tests created and fabricated by the Courts. The Supreme Court made this a way of our life for 50 years by forcing Roe V Wade on everyone. Now, it is best left to the States. Even your take on the Federalist Society is disingenuous at best. Judicial restraint is returning to a world before Roe V Wade because it was the Supreme Court THEN that inserted itself into the case. Righting that wrong is a return to more judicial restraint.

OK... here are all the cases beyond Dredd Scott: https://constitution.congress.gov/resources/decisions-overruled/

No, you never provided any evidence of that. You mentioned settlements. That is not ethnic cleansing. The simple fact is that the West Bank is under Israeli Control because they lost a war and were conquered. Israel has handed over much control to the Palestinian Authority. How exactly is this apartheid?

The entire argument is going to be subjective here regarding ones stance on putting the PRIDE flag into a classroom or not... that is my point. Leave the politics out of the classroom. Stop pushing your agenda onto kids. I have little interest in writing a research paper here on all schools in the country and how many introduced pride flags, when they did so... I will leave it at my anecdotal experience in answering the question as to why this is more recent... because it is more recent that the LGBTQ stuff has been going crazy. You go back 10 years ago and we did not spend over half the year celebrating days, weeks, months out of the year for Transgender awareness day, Gay Pride Month, my dogs cousins brothers owner coming out of the closet day.... to include we must have teachers in the classroom dressed in rainbows like they came off the street with PRIDE flags all over their classrooms. That was not a norm 10 years ago like it is today.

I missed that. My apologies.

Well great! I am glad we could finally agree that it is constitutional to overturn Roe v Wade. So, now you are a big Dredd Scott supporter? Stare Decisis is a solid rule of thumb, not an absolute. Roe V Wade was one of the most overarching and egregious rulings in the Supreme Court's history. It went on to define generations of angst, hate, and discontent with the ruling, as well as numerous other rulings that had to be fixed as it was continually challenged in Court.

The pushing of all things PRIDE into the classroom is recent... BECAUSE it is a political message meant to push that view (all of what the PRIDE flag encompasses) onto children. There is a reason why you see this in more left wing places and liberal run/controled schools. It is entirely political.

No, you did not just say real. You mocked me by saying I would leave them to a porn star as if I did not support anything at all. What you did was dishonest. *Some kids fall prey to online porn. Do you support legislation pushed by Republicans in various right leaning states to regulate online porn more to require age verification to help prevent kids from accessing it? Any other measures? Your position here is that they are going to see this in porn... so we should teach them how to do it in the classroom too? No, that is in fact asinine. You are not giving them an alternative, you are simply endorsing it and pushing your own warped values onto them. You can have blow job training sessions with your own kid, maybe even teach them about how to shit on people and how to properly fit their bondage or use a sex swing. Don't want to miss out on any of the sexual fetishes out there! Leave your sick twisted depravity out of the classroom. And yes, you are here trying to brow-beat with the Pride flag, you are the one proving that is exactly your intent with your intolerant of the intolerant rhetoric and notions that having an honest, scientific, and factual position about men being men and women being women... Hey, the Pro-Life flag and Christian flags do no harm to anyone either. Round and round we go... maybe we should keep your political crap out of the classroom.