User

So... you can't explain this then. All you can do is call me names and make baseless assertions.

Explain how the state censored this.

Sure... but you just claimed he could have been gay. That is not up to individual interpretation. This is a matter of scripture.

So, where was "insurrection" at in the report as you tried to claim?

Well, we know he was male, highly doubtful black, likely some kind of Middle Eastern shade, definitely not gay, as we also know this from scripture as well. Not that you appear to be all that knowledgeable on scripture, nor do you seem to be the type that cares to be honest about it either way.

No such thing has ever existed. The DOJ is literally run by whatever political hack the President wants and reports to him.

Guilty? Hell, now you think Jack is the Judge, Jury, and Executioner! Meanwhile, you lied about him using insurrection in his report.

Shooting someone is deadly force. Your intentions matter not when it comes to physics of bullets and human anatomy and physiology. This is not the movies where you can shoot someone in the leg and they are just fine. Maybe... but there are bones that bullets can bounce off and then there are major arteries there as well.

And there was no conspiracy to commit a crime here.

OK... and?

Oh man, that changes everything! It was 5% instead of 20% of deaths being your own government killing people.

Like how you run away from countless threads when you know you are beat?

So, you admit you are a liar then? He did not call it an insurrection. He made no legal argument to call it one. It is not my job to explain what that means. It is your claim that is bogus. It is your job to admit that or defend it.

I did. The word insurrection does not appear in that document.

How exactly do you rid the world of dictatorships when people like you cheer and support some of them on and then lie using dead children to defend them?

I am not going to question the guys actions as heroic, as charging anyone with a gun to disarm this is the essence of bravery and heroism. I will question the latter judgment in letting the guy go. However, many people are not prepared to kill. Its the entire reason militaries around the world spend so much time trying to train people, including the American military, so that they will act when the moment comes.

OK, show us the parts where he proved it was an "insurrection" Assuming that "arrest" = conviction or that those arrested constituted the bulk of those involved in criminal wrongdoing? No.

Says the guy who started this thread on fiction.

Quite a few people have been killed by rental trucks. So... you think rental trucks are bad? No. Where did I ever say everyone should have at least one gun? This is what folks like you are forced to do when you can't make well-reasoned arguments: you have to argue from the absurd. The answer to your questions is that not all killing is bad. I mean, maybe perhaps you are the kind of person who would just stand there and watch someone rape and murder your wife?

Facts don’t care about your feelings. You continue to lie using dead children to support your terrorist pals in Hamas.

There is usually that point in most of these discussions where folks like you know you have nothing of substance to offer and resort to being an ass like this.

Nope.

Like what? Guns are not inherently bad. Criminals are bad. Perhaps you should do more to combat crime and punish criminals.

That was not God's mistake. I would try to explain it to you, but its obvious you are just asking childish questions on purpose. Define what you mean by hate here, because folks like you think that if we don't all wear rainbow clothing and go out to the clubs to have wild gay sex orgies proclaiming our undying loyalty to the LGBTQ movement then we "hate" Based on the ignorant question you just asked, it is evident you do not know much about Jesus at all.

Well, other than the invading part, he is not wrong.