User

Let's review, you post a quote, attributed to Forbes. I point out that the quote doesn't appear anywhere except in The China Daily. You then respond that you will get me the link, but you are out. (Which presumes there is a link to a Forbe article) Then, when you get back, you post a link to some other Forbes article that doesn't have the quote. I call you out on this and now you claim you got the quote from AI and it added the Forbes on the end... So, why didn't you admit that to begin with, when I pointed out the quote originally was not found in Forbes and you insisted you would be back with the link? Why not admit that you just got it from AI then? Why force me to figure this out like this? You want to know why I accuse you of deception, this is why. And I was not responding to you here, was I?

So... why try to post a link to some other random Forbes article as if that was the one you got the quote from? Do you see how that comes across as deceptive? So, earlier, when you attributed it to Forbes... what was that then, a mistake?

Where in that linked piece does any of this appear: Highly efficient China's healthcare system is highly efficient, with the country achieving a remarkable level of healthcare efficiency. In 2022, China was the only country to reach zero inefficiency, meaning it maximized its healthcare spending to deliver the best possible health outcomes based on its level of investment. This efficiency is a result of several factors, including high vaccination rates, widespread use of prenatal care, low government corruption, and a larger share of health spending coming from public sources rather than private. The system's efficiency is a testament to China's commitment to improving health outcomes while controlling costs, offering an example for other countries seeking to enhance their health systems. Forbes

OK, this one was funny. I mean, you are still a lazy spambot, a hairy mole on the rear of this forum, but I laughed at how stupid this one was.

Seriously. Why don't you stop being a coward long enough to actually explain why anyone's First Amendment rights are being violated here, actually defend your assertions, and answer questions? I mean, I know why, because you are a coward and know you are full of shit. Going into a Church, on someone else private property, trespassing, refusing to leave when asked, is not a 1st Amendment protected activity. You know this, which is why you mindlessly say "First Amendment" and then run away.

Yes, we know they are not stopping them, because ICE has thousands of agents there to prevent them from doing so. The fact that they are trying to is the issue.

No, you said: "It was ME who subscribed to many scientists, doctors, researchers, epidemiologists, virologists, immunologists" So, who? If it exists. If I can figure out which one you were talking about. It is a wild goose chase for me. When you could just easily have posted it by now.

Name everyone you subscribe to. Imagine, all this effort you have put into this, when you could have just gotten the link by now.

No, you subscribe to a tiny select group of conspiratorial fear-mongers and frauds and selectively cherry-pick what they say and ignore most everything else. You did all that work, so you can push baseless assertions and, when challenged, balk at actually backing them up. The real work is by people like me who suffer through the endless pages of lies, obfuscation, twisting of facts, to call you out on it.

I am no more lazy than you are here. It was your assertion and you are too lazy to back it up.

Well, as usual, you can't deal with the substance, so you have to be absurd. Are you really this stupid and dishonest? You do not have a First Amendment right to trespass into someone else's property and refuse to leave.

Again, you are the one wanting to quibble over degrees of "threat" or "interference" None of that matters, its just your distraction. She was, in fact, obstructing. Ross was not standing near the front of her vehicle, he was moving to help effect an arrest, he was only in front AFTER she backed up pointing the vehicle at him (intentionally or not) He was the only one to draw his weapon as he was the one being threatened at that moment. I swear, you are a cowardly clown.

This is exactly what I signed up for. After all the lawfare Biden engaged in, with arresting a Pro-Life father in front of his family with an heavily armed FBI team for their made up violation of the FACE act, I want to see Trump doing this all day long to the left. Lets make sure we send the armed FBI SWAT team to his house in the eariy morning. Lets make sure to leak that arrest to the press too.

Well, no, this is why you have to engage in totalitarianism to force this onto others.

You are one of the most prolifically pathological liars on this forum man. That was not a lie, she was pulled out into the middle of the road. The fact that ICE can slowy try to drive around her after traffic was slowed down and backed up is not evidence she was not impeding them, just not completely. There is no scale here where some obstruction is OK you clown. Also, she was pulled much farther out into the middle of the road before she was confronted and told to exit the vehicle.

Wow, you are so famaliar with your research here, you can't easily cite a piece of it when needed? No, this is not the first time you have played this game with me. You make baseless assertions, then when called out, balk.

Of course I get to do it, you are here pushing it right now and this is the dumb game you play regardless. You make assertions then refuse to back them up. I have done my homework on this, which is why I know you are pushing garbage. I have also been in this thread before now, challenging you. What you have put here is hardly "research" and if you can't back it up, that is on you, not me. In the time it took you to write out this crap response, you could have easily gotten whatever link to whatever study you claimed existed.

How would you know? You are a coward hiding from me that runs away when I respond to your lies and garbage spam you post.

So... no, you can't. Like just about every time I call you or West out, you balk and can't back up your stuff. You were trying to use this as evidence to push your claim about COVID causing/increasing risk of Cancer. It was not. Do you actually have anything to back that up or to support your assertion about "many" doctors?

So... can you provide a link to that study and quote the relevant sections? I am not mad at you, just calling out your BS for what it is.

Anecdotal evidence is just that... and just like your quote that appears to be from some Chinese propaganda outfit, you did not provide a link so we could even evaluate it on our own. His experiences, even if true for himself, do not provide any kind of picture for the overal system and how it impacts the average Chinese person.

From the paper you quoted: “This scoping review was not designed to estimate cancer risk or incidence, nor to draw causal inferences, but rather to systematically assemble, categorize, and contextualize published reports of malignancies temporally associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection.”

What evidence do you have for such a claim that not only were unvaccinated people were getting COVID less than vaccinated, but many times less?

LOL, do you have any idea how recruiters work? This was not a job offer. Recruiters spam people with invitations and requests, trying to find candidates. They very rarely are doing anything more than looking at whatever public information the people they are looking at made available on things like their LinkedIn profiles. These are not job offers. Its just some recruiter trying to spam people hoping to find anyone they can to fit a job opening description they have to start the process of seeing if they can be the person for that job.

Sure, it is possible... but you started this thread on more than just health care. I am American and I am well aware of issues in Canada as I have been there on business many times and worked directly with Canadians extensively for years.