gatomontes99

With this opinion in mind, do you think you are better than him? Only because you agree with one and not the other. Actually, John McCain had a very good, market based solution, that addressed the real cost issues. But the left rejected a true solution. No one is saying it is their fault for getting cancer (thaough some cancers are a result of individual action, just like heart disease and diabetes). However, pointing to other options that are available isn't wrong minded. It is the opposite, really. People usually over state support for what ever they support, and that is you here. It would be safe to say that well under half of the country feels that this guy deserved to die. What is more troubling is that more than 1% do think he should die. You should look deep in your heart and ask yourself if you like who you've become.

Not what he was talking about.

They have no moral values because they reject God. If you don't have God as the determiner of what is good and right, then morals are subjective. If morals are subjective, then you can justify anything you like. Then morals can flow with what ever the emotion of the moment is and what feels good becomes what is right.

Well, he wrote a book titled War on Warriors. And he said: It's his mission to ensure that the top brass have the best interests of everyone in mind. That includes not fighting wars just because. What you posted was someone else characterization what he said. What he actually said is vastly different. When you read or hear someone characterize someone else's words, you should find the actual words that were said. Here they are: To properly characterize what he said is that there could be a temple built, he just didn't know how that could happen. As for his book, American Crusade, the book is a topical discussion of right v left in our political spectrum and whether or not the American values of liberty and freedom will give way to regulations and laws. It has nothing to do with Muslims other than to say that the countries that harbor or support terrorism can and should be banned and it shouldn't matter if they happen to be Muslim theocracies.

Sorry, but I'm downvoting all the people that justify taking a father and husband away from his family because you don't like his business practices.

And the left will justify the violence.

Except, in this case, the poll in question was conducted by a DNC loyal organization with Liberal members that were asked who was the worst President right as Trump announced his second candidacy. Lo and behold, they said Trump was the worst. Then they shopped the data around and only the left wing news organizations picked it up. It is a study in confirmation bias, story selection bias and fake news.

Citing APSA is NO different than citing the DNC.

The Guardian is a extreme left political propaganda website. Plus, are those the same people that said Trump's policies would cause inflation when it didn't and the Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation when it was real and that there was a pee tape? You have a credibility problem.

This "Republican" Senator has suddenly become steadfastly against Pete Hegseth. Hegseth has famously said that he will make the military better for those that serve. But that means fewer wars. Fewer wars is not good for the defense industry. Guess who supports Joni Ernst? NorPAC Apollo Global Management Blackstone Group RTX Corp Capital Group Do any of these companies have military contracts? Well, call me Ethel and feed me porridge, they do! NorPAC Apollo Global Management: Blackstone Group: RTX Group: Capital Group: Her top 5 donors all have a vested interest in continuous wars. Say that again. HER TOP 5 DONORS ALL HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN CONTINUOUS WARS. Is there any wonder why she doesn't support the guy that wants to get us out of unnecessary wars?

EXCLUSIVEBiden will leave office as the 'worst president' in modern history, according to voters in devastating poll I didn't need a poll. But I'm glad I have it.

It's weird for sure. But someone in there thinks he's innocent. So it may be hard to get anything more than a hung jury.

But you can't find one person that actually said that. He didn't say he would just shutdown the IRS. Now you are just mischaracterizing his position for your own purposes. Well: "In your role as a Special Agent, you’ll integrate your expertise in accounting with law enforcement proficiency " IRS Special Agent Job Posting Uh huh. You said that didn't you? Sure sounds like someone that calls people he disagrees with Nazis.

So, you are applying your assumptions to their motivations with no actual evidence that your assumptions are indeed their motivations? And I'm supposed to accept that because....? He said he would make cuts to the IRS. Yes. Does that mean he would cut investigations as you declared? And you believe that financial crimes experts aren't accountants? Have you ever heard of forensic accountants? And you just invalidated anything you've said. Calling the people that disagree with you bots and Nazis means you aren't serious.

It's not semantic. If you go to the grocery store with $100 to buy food and buy candy, chips and soda it could be argued you wasted your money. Now, you take the candy, soda and chips back and buy chicken, rice and brocoli. You cut waste and fraud but didn't cut the budget. Instead, you used the money correctly. Making SS and Medicare work properly is not making a budget cut. Who said that? I know of plans to simplify the tax code so that it is far easier to enforce and far harder to cheat. I also know of push back on thousands of new ARMED IRS agents. But that was about this weird need to have accountants armed. How is that necessary? Half of the threads I start come from X. It is just easier than doing the quote function on a mobile browser.

It sounds like the prosecution has requested dismiss manslaughter.

Twitter is still running. It now has thousands of fact checkers that add community notes and do it for free. It has tackled a lot of the bots (you can't get them all). It has gotten rod.of tje government interference and exposed it for what it was. You don't like that he allows conservative, liberal and moderate voices to ne heard and they all have to be truthful or suffer a community note. X has become a tremendous free speech outlet. Embrace it. It's good for everyone.

I debunked this before you even posted:

Yeah. Isn't that such an upside down opinion? She has sympathy for a guy that killed someone during the commission of a felony but has no sympathy for a man that protected an entire subway car of people from someone having an episode.

Waste and fraud isn't a cut in spending. Stopping waste and fraud makes the money available for proper use...like paying claims. Which the programs are having trouble doing. Why are you against stopping waste and fraud? Lmao...Are you such a simp for big government that you actually defend waste and fraud? .

If you can catch him in one of those lies, he isn't immune to perjury.

That's what I thought. You can't cope with reality. You don't have anything of substance. This is all about how you feel, not about how it may or not work.

Literally debunked this lie using an ultra left wing source and you are still repeating it? Why? Can you note cope with reality? Is it that all that you have is an emotionally charged assertion with no supporting evidence? Don't you have something, anything, with substance. Like one thing.

It is starting to look like a hung jury will be the result. The jury has apparently told the judge they cant come to a unanimous decision and the judge is considering the next move.

It's a tried and true scare tactic of the left.