gatomontes99

Well, you support rapists. After all, they are innocent until proven guilty. But gun owners are guilty and should be punished.

You are making my point. You only want to punish those that are not going to do harm rather than save lives. It's all about control.

They do tornado and fire drills too. Should we make the buildings out of noncombustabke materials with no electricity or gas and all underground so they don't have that fear too? Kids process danger and the liklihood of danger very well and they fully understand the drills are just drills.

They don't fear going to school. You are more likely to get by lightning than be shot at a school.

Why do you insist on punishing people that are never going to use their weapons inappropriately? Do we ban sugar because some are obese? Cars because some will speed? Alcohol because some will drink and drive? Where do you draw the line when it comes to punishing the responsible for what someone else might do?

Excuses for what? Not taking innocent people's rights because some aśshole is an aŝshole?

Democrats don't want to solve the problem. They get their power from broken promises. They get votes for promising to take guns, not from solving the problem.

You are missing the point and proving mine.

https://www.sandyhookpromise.org/blog/advocacy/5-life-saving-changes-after-the-sandy-hook-tragedy/ But that isn't what you are looking for is it? You have determined the only way to solve the problem is to eliminate guns and you think Americans want kids to die. Receipts: But my point is, there were other options presented and you hardened your stance, made assumptions and engaged in hyperbole. Just like you did here. Just like you agreed was wrong earlier.

That b.s.

Should you subsidize my ticket?

You ignored what I said on multiple opportunities and absolutely inferred people wanted kids to die. And now I got you to renounce that b.s. until you realized what you were doing.

Think Tank Urges DOGE To Make ATC ‘User-Funded’ Reason Foundation says government funding model a drag on ATC system. There are positive and negative aspects of this. I will say, I like user funded programs.

I hope they keep saying things like this.

You ignored all of the non-gun-restriction solutions and, instead, painted everyone as wanting to kill children. Do you not see the similarities?

Did youn't do the same in the Madison shooting thread?

All you've proven is that Contrarius is correct and your poll was biased. No...it was propaganda. And you bought it.

We have enough aśśholes to deal with, we don't need to import more.

I treated you like you treated me. I called the case nuanced and not clear cut. You made a crap ton of assumptions and tried to push me in a corner. So I did the same to you. The hypocrisy here is that you claimed to be being fair. You don't even see what a judgemental priçk you were being.

How does it feel?

Of course you support rapists, typical.

So the guy already raped the girl once, months before. He was charged for that and for child porn.

Some how, the left is always on the side of the child rapist.

Why are you on the rapists side?

In this country, a dead rapist is a good thing.