Jump to content

gatomontes99

Senior Member
  • Posts

    7,682
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    61

Everything posted by gatomontes99

  1. I have been looking for the full story on this. I saw the X posts a few days ago. We talk about freedom not being free. Yes, we could put trackers on everyone, watch every penny they spend and predict when they are moving towards law breaking and then arrest them even before they break the law. That could stop murders cold. But what kind of life is that? What kind of life is it to have every movement monitored, every action scrutinized, and punishment for crimes you did not commit? Freedom means people will make horrifically bad choices. Freedom means innocent people will have to deal with the consequences of those bad choices. Dealing with the bad choices of some is a far smaller price than the tyranny of certainty. With the tyranny of certainty, we all pay for the bad choices of some. With the thranny of certainty, everyone is punished for the actions of a few.
  2. I am sure this will fail to convince anyone, but let's try. Trump says that Iran was dangerously close to having nukes and would use them if they got them. The opposition says Iran wasn't close and even if they were, they wouldn't use them. If Trump is wrong, what are the consequences? We eliminated the largest state funding of terror in the world. If the opposition is wrong, what are the consequences? Nuclear war in Europe.
  3. Israel attacks when provoked. If someone came over and exterminated half of north America and then said they would kill the rest of us later, would you be passive?
  4. First off, that was a major violation of fair use. Second, it is not an unnecessary war if the war prevented nuclear holocaust, which it did.
  5. I didn't say he set up the rally. I said he set up the protest. The protest that was attended by the people he invited with his posts and then helped them get there. You are just blatantly denying what is right in front of you. Fine. Don't read up on it. Live in your fantasy world.
  6. No, it is logic based on real world facts. I quoted the part that said they paid the "informant" to set up a protest, recruit people and they even helped him with logistics. I don't know how you can possibly say they didn't fund it. It's a similie not an analogy. SPLC "entrapped" people by recruiting them to be white nationalists/supremacists/racists and then have them protest at political events like Charlottesville. Lame. He actually did create a demonstration and set up transportation for some of the participants. That is what he was paid to do per the indictment that you quoted. Did you not read it or did you just not understand it? It is identity fraud not identity theft, and read the link. It explains how misrepresenting an identity is fraud.
  7. Do you not see the difference? The police do undercover work to catch criminals and they even buy some illegal goods and do some other violations of the law. But they do it under strict supervision, with specific approval and follow statutory guidelines. SPLC was funding hate groups do create data that they could use to manipulate gullible voters. What they did is specifically illegal for law enforcement. What they did is called entrapment. No. They paid an agitator to create a demonstration that could be used as anecdotal evidence of a narrative that was not as strong as they wanted it to be. Dare I say, nearly nonexistent. And you can't disprove that because nearly every published study on white supremacy used the faked SPLC data. Yes. That is what informants are. However, paying an individual to infiltrate a group under false pretenses is illegal. The police can do it. Private entities cannot. It is. It is called Synthetic Identity Frad. While SIF is typically used in financial schemes, it is still illegal. I have not checked every state, but I am sure most (if not all) have something similar to California. Their law does not require a financial gain for the SIF definition to apply. SIF - Google AI
  8. Well, first, law enforcement does fund some crime. Undercover officers often buy drugs, guns, etc. That is a portion of the funding. You are making a silly argument. But that is not what SPLC did. They literally funded the rally. They paid this kid to recruit and set up transportation. They even helped him secure the transportation. It is all in that indictment. Like I said, I can't make you accept reality. We have known reality for years. This group was paid to produce a boogie man. When the real villain was not scared enough, they tried to inflate their argument. They paid people to pump up the volume. And their rhetoric worked. It created a false narrative that was used as fact by MSM every election cycle. Their lies led to a terror attack on the Family Research Council. They even listed Charlie Kirk's TP USA just a short time before he was murdered. And it was all lies. I can only assume that your insistence on excusing this behavior is an endorsement of their actions or willful ignorance.
  9. Like I said. They funded it. They offered material help. All you want to do is defend the organization that lied to you. Lies are bad enough. Keep in mind those lies led to people getting shot. Their lies inspired terrorism. But you won't acknowledge that, despite it being well documented in court records.
  10. I literally quoted it. I can't force you to acknowledge reality. It is right there. I am sorry reality ruins your perspective, but maybe now is a good time for you to be introspective. The SPLC funded the hate groups they claimed to fight. What else isn't real? The fine people on both sides story? Russia collusion? Biden was mentally healthy? The real answers are easy to find. Just try. That characterization of the indictment is a flat out lie. The SPLC paid an individual to organize and assisted in the logistics. They were an active participant. And you bought their front facing bullspit. You fell for the lies. And here you are defending them for lying to you.
  11. Omg. It's 10? Fuçk me! We need to mobilize the fuçking national guard!!!!Holly shìt this huge!!! Has anyone told the President?! Shelter in place! Shoot every bat you see! Every bat! Even the old bats at the grocery store, you can't be too safe! Where a mask. If that bats can't see your face they won't think you are a bug! Wear rubber gloves! Lysol the kids! Polish your teeth! ********** Give me a break.
  12. The left is arguing that the SPLC was really a FBI front group or some dumb b.s. they were not. So the left is pivoting and now they are saying Trump is trying to promote hate...by eliminating an organization that was actively promoting hate. Just shamefuel.
  13. The Senator is arguing that HHS should not make cuts. His example is that rabies is dangerous and cutting the office would harm Americans. Kennedy, rightly, points out one person can handle the 1 to 3 cases per year. I argue that 1 person is too many. Because 1 person needs a supervisor. The supervisor isn't the director of the HHS so the supervisor needs a supervisor. All for 1 to 3 cases per year. Maybe just assign rabies to a blanket group (individual) that covers rare to non-existent diseases.
  14. A judge blocked the VA map. https://wjla.com/news/local/virginia-congressional-map-redistricting-referendum-vote-attorney-general-tazewell-county-court-republicans-enjoins-injuctive-relief-voters-election-democrats-house-representatives The map does dilute minority representation which is a huge no-no according to the SCOTUS. https://share.google/aimode/JKxxCe78aNL0BloXW
  15. Justice Department says they funded extremist networks. ********** Justice.gov "Unbeknownst to donors, some of their donated money was being used to fund the leaders and organizers of racist groups at the same time that the SPLC was denouncing the same groups on its website." ********** The money was operating capital for these groups: ********** "Between at least 2014 and 2023, the SPLC paid their Fs in a clandestine manner. Doing so hid the fact that while the SPLC received donation money under the auspices that the funds would be used to "dismantle" violent extremist groups, this donation money was, instead, being used, in part, by the SPLC to pay leaders and others within these same violent extremist groups. That money was then used for the benefit of the individuals as well as the violent extremist groups. ********** As for the Unite the Right ********* "F-37 was a member of the online leadership chat group that planned the 2017 "Unite the Right" event in Charlottesville, Virginia and attended the event at the direction of the SPLC. F-37 made racist postings under the supervision of the SPLC and helped coordinate transportation to the event for several attendees. Between 2015 and 2023, the SPLC secretly paid F-37 more than $270,000.00." ********** Do you not get it yet? For decades you and your ilk quoted these a-holes as proof that we are racist. We told you that the SPLC was fake. We knew these groups were not, in any way shape or form, relevant or popular. This proves that we were right the entire time. The SPLC is endemic of the entire left wing apparatus. The entirety of the left wing movement is fake. It is a series of studies with predetermined outcomes, organizations with ideologically motivated goals and dupes willing to believe all of that is real.
  16. No. They literally paid to have the Charlottesville happen. They created the white supremacist movement for donations.
  17. It's literally an investigation that was started under Biden and it isn't a Twitter rumor, it is a full blown indictment. The same thing you just knew made Trump guilty. The thing is, now they have actual bank receipts. Money changed hands. The evidence is real and substantial. This is going somewhere.
  18. He's talking about new indictments. This was only 2019 to 2023 I believe. And it was only a handful of people. Except Blanche says they opened an investigation during the Biden administration years and it was suddenly halted without explanation. "Initial Investigation: Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche stated that an investigation into the SPLC's use of paid informants to infiltrate groups began years ago during the Biden administration. Abrupt Stop: Blanche indicated that the investigation was "shuttered" during President Biden’s term, with the suggestion that officials at the time opted not to bring charges before the Trump administration revived it." https://share.google/aimode/2UK0EssTmPaBLsFc5 So weird how the SPLC was blatantly violating laws and supporting white supremacists and the Biden DOJ just did nothing about it. Even more weird how the SPLC financed the Charlottesville riot. Looks like all the white nationalists at that rally were paid for by the SPLC. Amazing huh. The SPLC caused that violence in a false flag event. Weird how that happened and yet here you are acting like they are some hollier than thou organization. Does that mean you support agencies that fund racists?
  19. Her changing a form does not fix it. She either lied on the form before or she is lying now. Either way, she lied.
  20. Bongino called this whole thing. The left tried to cast doubt on Patel by making claims of him day drinking and not being available. Bongino knew that was false, he was there.
  21. We can ask questions about that. But let's not draw any conclusions from asking questions.
  22. Brandon does an amazing job of telling THE story of Omar's fraud. The hilarious part is...well, there are several...she changed the figures to make herself look less successful. I think she thought she would avoid prosecution. The problem is she admits to checking the document before it was turned in. So she is liable either way.
  23. AP The Justice Department alleges the civil rights group defrauded donors by using their money to fund the very extremism it claimed to be fighting, with payments of at least $3 million between 2014 and 2023 to people affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan, the United Klans of America, the National Socialist Party of America and other extremist groups. “The SPLC was not dismantling these groups. It was instead manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred,” Blanche said. ********** We all knew this was a fraudulent DNC front group. But I had no idea just how scummy they were. I knew the left was dirty. But I am shocked at just how nasty this is. They paid the KKK so they could say white supremacy was rising. They paid people to steal documents and then paid other people to take the fall. They funneled money to fake groups designed to sound like conservative hat groups like Exalted Knights of the KKK and Fox Photography. They say this is politically motivated. I say hell yeah. We should all be politically motivated to stop this b.s. This, on the day Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick resigns for defrauding the government and stealing funds from FEMA. She will likely go to jail for that. And more information is coming out about Omar that I am about to post in a different thread. The left, especially the left that holds power, is insanely dirty. Let's clean house now.
×
×
  • Create New...