CdnFox

perfect example thanks

All the threads are blending together for me today.... russia attacked bud lite because nato sent someone's panties to a ukrainan trans girl in a bar, - that's what we're talking about, right? Imma just gonna have a nap for a bit i think...

But ....what if the guy on the other side of you was ALSO gay and you just didn't want to be accused of being a straight guy who beats on gays? that way it's gay on gay and you can't be accused of picking on someone just because they're gay. Also, how did he hit on you? Did he try to buy you a drink? Was it a bud light? Because that's just asking for it right now. I'm probably over thinking this. Carry on.

I was like 'that's really wrong" . THen i was like "no, wait, he's right". Then i was back to "no that's really wrong." . At this point i have all the emotions.

Awww muffin - you mad? is it time for your cookie and your nap? Seems like insults is all you have left Oh my ANGRY underwear talk is quite different, and you have to pay extra for THAT! Whereas you've got no skills at all - i guess we know why YOU'RE bitter, nobody's offering YOU their panties it would seem Seriously girl, i don't mind having a little fun at your expense but don't take this TOO seriously. it's the net. When you get to the point where you're just lashing out at people like that it's time to take a step back.

Fair enough - you're probably right - he's about one post away from being discovered later foaming at the mouth with a pair of woman's panties on his head for no clearly explained reason.

That's the dumbest thing i've heard. On several levels First off they don't actually. For example you can't hire someone do commit a crime, even if boht parties are willing. No right to do that. So 'right' off the bat you're wrong Second - you literally said 'you have the right to do something as long as other people agree". LOLOL - yeah, that's not what a right is kiddo. Uuuuuhhh - that's the declaration of independance. Did you mean to post the constitution? There's nothing in the declaration about having the right to be hired by people who want to hire you ROFLMAO - you couldn't even get that right You must be furious at yourself right now

Yep. But i get it - like many on the left you believe if you repeat a lie often enough it'll become true. Well that's what you said - you insisted that they MUST be used if they were HIS - so they MUST be used if they were YOURS! And why would you bother owning them at all if you're not going to use them? Look - i understand that this must be a little embarrasing for you and tough to discuss - but we're not here to judge you. LOL - awww that's so cute, now you're copying me my little nephew does that, have your mommy call me, we'll set up a play date. (wear underwear for god's sake tho)

there are very strict rules around all of that. Fire a writer because you're going in a new direction and you have to hire that one back or nobody for the next year or two. It's just not a real thing. Especially not with a union. I'm sure you think that's how it went. But there were other problems. I followed that closely because i was interested to see if he could get away with it.' Nope. So mike harris would have just defunded them and been done with it. Not tried to fix it.

Well you just said your wife wears YOUR panties, after you're done with them. Are you looking to start a club or something? Guys who wear panties before their wife does? You could be president!

Well you did. Oh - ok, so they're your panties and then when you're done with them you gift them to her. My what a gentleman you are. I hope you at least wash them first?

Give us a break. We know you can't really read ROFLMAO - YOuR ClAiM is JUST an OPINION without FACTS!!!!! Dude you're a joke, constantly insisting that eveyrone else provide proof of their statements and refusing to do so with your own. And nobody believes for half a second you've 'observed' anything other than whatever your confirmation bias will let you.

You know precisely where - and now you follow me around desperaetly trying to pretend it didn't happen But we know it did. And the fact you spend so much energy trying to bury it like a cat in a litterbox shows you know you did something pretty pathetic'

Sure - you were wrong (Twice) and if you want to move on from that and do better in the future i've got no problem with it.

No! Good lord - where the hell did you get that idea? Nobody has a 'right' to be hired Pot, meet kettle. Kettle - this is pot.

You would be the one who insisted they didn't. I've said that all along - in fact i've said i'm not sure this is even about that. So why are you trying to push others into believing that this ISN"T the case? Also - her rights weren't affected. Nobody has done anything to her - Bud light is the one who's getting pounded on. Are you saying somehow Bud Lite is 'trans'? I could buy the idea that they're water that identifies as beer i guess. True. Whereas you're a bit of a hypcrite and very dishonest

I think you'll find ownership doesn't require actual indentured servitude to be a thing So - just to be clear, you're saying you gave YOUR panties to your wife as a gift? Uuhhh yeahhhhh - definitely obvious. Well. LIke i said - not here to judge. That's what she said i bet LOLOLOL (probably followed by 'do your own laundry!')

You were drinking pepsi while we're talking about trans people?!?!?!!? Boycott in 3....2...1..... (this is LITERALLY how some of the people here seem to think it works )

I'm not lashing out at anybody. You on the ohter hand are lashing out at EVERYBODY Chill girl - it's just the internet.

nope. One cannot act as a proxy without written authorizaiton stating the date time and place of the event for which you are being a proxy, or stating a date range and the type of meeting you can be proxy for. You have absolutely no authority in any way to be a proxy for nato. THis is why i point out from time to time that nobody gives a crap what you care about. Your delusions about being a proxy for nato have no merit in the real wolrd regardless of what the voices in your head say. It isn't even close. Please learn what words mean before using them. Oh? Define what he meant by chickenshit. I suspect that nato can be. But - he did specifically reference the actions of nato rather than nato itself. I'm pretty sure actions can be referred to as 'chickenshit'. I agree overall more with you than him on this as he knows but you DO have a very bad habit of pretending things are fallacies when they very clearly are not And your statement that you are a proxy for nato is just like 'scary-delusional'. You're just a nobody on the net, not a proxy for anyone.

Man - you sure are fixated on the idea of him wearing panties. Something you want to tell the class? We're not here to jugde.

Actually he could own the panties his wife wears without actually wearing them or using them himself. So your statement was incorrect. If you're going to try to 'ding' someone on a technicality - try to think it through first?

ROFLMAO!!!! HOooooly crap that's hilarious - i actually snickered out loud You could be a hypcrite for the olympic team What kind of person writes paragraphs demanding that peopel MUST provide sources - then gets this bent out of shape because someone asked her for a source LOL - @Nationalist is right you know - you HAVE been owned Thanks for letting me live rent free in your head - very spacious in here, lots of air.

that is an ad hominem fallacy so not an argument Just a point of order - that is not an ad hominem fallacy. Ad hominem is where you dismiss the argument because of a flaw with the presenter of the argument. SO - if he had said To me your argument is wrong because YOU are a chickenshit and chickenshits are always awrong" - THAT would have been an ad hominem. Claiming the argument is a 'chickenshit' argument is actually a statement about the quality of the argument itself, not the presenter. You can address why the argument is or is not a 'chickenshit' one. ALthough i admit i'm not sure what makes it 'chickenshit' in his mind You really do have to brush up on logical fallacies, you're using the term wrong fairly frequently these days.