Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    32,390
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    327

Posts posted by CdnFox

  1. 2 hours ago, Army Guy said:

    Perhaps, or maybe so are you....

    No, I know my shit

    I guess you'll have to find out the hard way. Which is how the military got here and you can complain to your heart's content about how it's people and the governments but it's happening again right now and I'm the one screaming about how it shouldn't be acceptable and you're the one accepting it happening to them again

    I will probably both still be here in 2 years. We'll see how things have gone

    • Downvote 1
  2. 2 hours ago, Army Guy said:

    Sure, it is much easier for Canadians to bury their sons and daughters than pay for them to have modern equipment...Not sure why that bothers you so much that finally we are taking our military seriously,

     

    Problem is we're not taking it seriously and you're just not able to see that.

    The correct answer is to set realistic goals that can be achieved without destroying our economy.

    If you do anything else one of two things happens. You destroy the economy and then everybody slashes the military because it's the least painful thing to cut politically, or you promise to do something and then it never happens.

    We have seen this a trillion times in our history and not just with the military but with climate change and other things as well. I don't know how you don't see this coming. 

    Here's a prediction, of the five percent 1.5 or so is allowed to be 'infrastructure' right?  How much you want to bet that portion gets front loaded.  in other words we add that to what we're spending on the military now before any additional funds get spent on the actual military. so we build roads we were ALREADY going to build and fix bridges and so on. All of which was going to happen anyway and has nothing to do with actual military. 

     that''ll be what they do for the most part for the first 4 to 8 years (depending how long carney is in)  The military will get a tiny bit of an improvement but nothing like what you're thinking. but the public will believe we've MASSIVELY increased spending.  But new gear and better stuff will be slow to show up. Oh they'll make announcements about how we're just about to put in an order for this or that but that's it.   We'll send more money to ukrane and call it military spending which is fine if you're into that but it doesn't help our boys. 

    And at the end of it we'll still be burying our kids and you'll still be wondering why people don't care about the military. 

  3. 39 minutes ago, User said:

    OK... and you are either smart enough to know there are still about a dozen dots to connect here to actually blame any of that on what happened here which makes you a dishonest liar or you are so incredibly ignorant that you don't understand that. 

    Which one are you?

    as is often the case, two things can be true. 

    • Like 1
  4. 9 minutes ago, Aristides said:

    No one supports them

    Sure they do. He's literally saying this is okay. He says if conservatives are allowed to criticize Governor Newsom for failing to maintain the firefighting infrastructure then it's perfectly acceptable that these people cheer the deaths of these texans because they "Had it coming"

    Quote

    so stop making excuses for people who ridicule tragedies in blue states. They are all scum and if that includes you, take a bow.

    And when did I do that. When did I ever suggest that it was okay or that anyone in any blue state had it coming when they died? When did I ever suggest that a single death from the California wildfires was acceptable or that they had it coming or that I was happy about it?

    You're no different than him. You're excited that these people are dead, and to justify your own psychotic thrill at the death of innocent people you try and pretend that I somewhere along the lines did something similar. And I have never ever ever done so or anything remotely close. Closest I came was saying that this wouldn't have happened if Newsome had actually repaired the reservoir as he was supposed to

    And you want to compare that to cheering for the death of children because they had it coming.

    This is the type of people who left are this is what the left is. It's disgusting

  5. 18 minutes ago, cannuck said:

    If you had any idea how corrupt government contracting is, and how slimy the backrooms of the Uniparty are you would never make such an incredibly naive statement.  One thing that should have tipped you off is our grandchildren inheriting 2.3 trillion in combined federal/provincial debt that have been raised to line the pockets of the backrooms and friends.

     

    And the big payoff comes when they leave office and then get put on the boards of these companies that they've helped funnel money into for years. At that point they do absolutely no work and make big six figure income, and they will be on a half dozen or a dozen boards so they collect millions of dollars a year for doing nothing.

    • Downvote 1
  6. 5 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

    Pretty much everything...   The only fact is that id1ots on the right cheered when a dem state has a fire that saw a loss of lives and id1ots on the left cheer when a red state has a flood with lost lives.  Naturally politics come into it and you're okay to somehow justify it's different because of Newsomes real or not forestry mismanagement....  Whatever.

    So you just resorting to lies now to cover up your own horrible Behavior? Can't even really condemn these democrats for what they did? You start off with a little fake sympathy and crocodile tears and then we see your true colors

    . You're pathetic human being. It was pretty obvious right off the bat you kind of stupid but You're showing now that you're just a garbage human.

    Every death that happened in California was a tragedy and everyone on the right said so. It was a tragedy that could have been largely avoided or mitigated if the government of California had done its job instead of completely screwing the pooch and everyone on the right said so.

    Everyone on the left says that the people of Texas deserve what happened here and that these deaths or something to be celebrated.

    Let me guess, you were a huge fan of the October 7th killings as well? You seem to get your jollies when people you don't like get killed even if they're innocent

  7. On 6/30/2025 at 7:10 PM, August1991 said:

    We Canadians have two languages and two religions - yet we get along.

    ==

    You Americans killed each other - like the crazy Europeans.   

    We don't get along at all you stupid french frog. Go suck a poutine. 

    22 hours ago, August1991 said:

    Disagree. Strongly.

    We Canadians have been involved in too many wars abroad.

    But amongst ourselves, we get along. We Canadians have a long history and despite our differences: French, English, Catholic, Protestant, we get along. 

    Planes of Abraham, matey rebellion, and frankly the only reason we haven't had more is because there aren't enough of us to bother

  8. 2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

    The one thing that is distinctive about the current era, is the common expectation that American natural disasters like this will inevitably result in ridiculous finger-pointing and divisive stupidity.  Sad, if you care about people... funny if you want them to fail.

    They're not finger pointing. They're cheering the deaths of Americans many of which were children.

    These are the people you support.

    • Like 1
  9. 29 minutes ago, herbie said:

    Makers just can't meet those targets. With their usual pointing of fingers at the customers not buying them.
    Not because they simply will not make what the customers want. HINT - it's not $130,000 F150 Lightnings and GMC Hummers.

    Push the deadlines back 1 single year and add HYBRIDS into the EV percentage.
    We'll see if the return of the Chevy Bolt and some actual price reductions from volume production affect the mix. 
    And offset EV incentives with a $1000 ICE only carbon tax.

    Yeah automakers have said they don't want anything to do with this. And the customers are not buying new vehicles of any ev type these days In any number that would suggest that they should be building those Vehicles.

    This is just another failure on the left

    • Like 1
  10. 40 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

    LMAO what the hell are you talking about?  You’re just spouting your made up nonsense without a shred of evidence again. he last time wTe went over this YOU hilariously lied and tried to claim Bush Jr ran a balanced budget when in fact he massively INCREASED the debt and never ran a single balanced budget  

     

    Yeah that never happened. And the one lying here is you.

    We went through example after example and the simple fact is you're wrong.

    Not only that you tried desperately to claim that the covid years were an example of trump's overspending and that the recovery from the covid spending was proof that Biden was fiscally responsible as if covid was just a normal thing that happens regularly

    If you have to continually lie to make your point you haven't gotten a very good point. And you don't have a very good point.

    And his lies like that that bring trump back into power. Hope you're enjoying

  11. 1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

    Actually surprised to hear your first sentence...   So you/we know ONE thing about the talks (reminding DST) and it's not looking good.....  Okay 😂

     

    I know a number of things about the talks. You may live under a rock but I don't. I had strong concerns even before the dst issue, and that confirmed them.  The final result will be the final result but honestly it is looking great.

    And you shouldn't be surprised, every Canadian should want us to get the best deal we can regardless of politics

    1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

    Given his background and experience, I and most Canadian's believe he's the right guy to negotiate for us so will assume he'll walk away with what he believes is the best deal for Canada.

    So you're just going to assume that whatever deal they get is the best deal we could possibly have gotten?

    And honestly, this is why we can't have nice things

    So what I'm really hearing you say deep down is that unless he actually signs a document making Canada the 51st state you're just going to take his performance as the best we could do without question and follow him blindly.

    Our country is doomed

    • Downvote 1
  12. 2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

    You're an absolute fool....  

    As per usual when you have facts thrown in your face you panic and run away.

    What part did you find foolish? The part where I pointed out there's a difference between criticizing a politician and cheering for people's deaths? Was that the foolish part in your opinion?

    God your disgusting little person. 

    1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

    Maybe rather than trying to inject yourself into every conversation, try thinking first....it will make you appear to be more intelligent.  

     

    I realized that hearing facts seems to frustrate the living hell out of you, but I'm afraid you're going to have to get used to it around here. And if you're going to get upset that people make comments on the discussion board then may I suggest the internet is probably not the place for you unless you're accompanied by your therapist

  13. 55 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

    Really....  There is a difference in people dying because of hurricane winds, tinder dry land and so-called forestry mismanagement in a blue state versus people dying in ANOTHER weather event in a red state?  Hard for you to understand but there is NO difference....people died tragically and it doesn't matter whether they're red, blue, yellow or green.

    Nice try in backtracking though....  Will have to remember that for Trump's next stupid, false and divisive comments, which should be fairly soon if it's a weekday.

    There is a difference between criticizing a governor who didn't do his job and cheering for people dying.

    What kind of pathetic human are you that you need this explained to you?

  14. 10 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

    Question for you....   Would you rather see Carney come out of the trade talks with Trump and a path forward that will benefit all of Canada, or would you rather see him fail and our country feel the negative affects of?

    Obviously I would rather see positive results from the trade talks. Hands down. To be honest it's obvious that that's not what's going to happen, carney is already positioned himself badly so unfortunately it's going to be a case of do we get one that's not great or one that's horrible. I hope we can get one as good as we can possibly get.

    That's not my biggest problem with Carney. I am furious that the one positive that he claimed. The one thing where conservatives could say"Well we may not like him or how he runs the country but at least he...."  has turned out to be pretty false.   He claimed he could defend canada against trump and be 'elbows up' and get us a decent trade deal and very quickly that is proving not to be the case. And if anything that's brutally disappointing. Everything else we can deal with internally, if he screws up on housing and affordability and the ecnonomy then we can boot him and have an election.  But the trade deal with the US was the ONE THING we desperately needed him to get right, and it's not looking good. 

    And we've still got the free trade negotiations next year, the deal struck now if we get one doesn't even include that, 

    So here's a counter question, if we get a substandard trade deal will you agree that Carney is not the man to lead our country and get rid of it? Or will you try and pass it off as being a good deal even though it's crap?

    • Downvote 1
  15. 1 hour ago, Army Guy said:

    Just saying if there is a will we as a nation can accomplish anything, like vimy ridge, Juno beach, telephone communications, it is easy to say it can't be done,things never get done that way...

     

    Well in that case just defend Canada with what we've got. I mean if we could accomplish anything like maybe ridge, Juno Beach, telephone communications then you should be able to defend Canada with the number of people that are in the military and the gear on hand. It's easy to say it can't be done, things never get done that way.

    Or you can be real. 

  16. 8 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

    Any conversation with you is generally a waste of time because of your anti-left bias...  Again, you and others would twist this another way of it were Cali.

     

    Oh look! You realized you were wrong AGAIN and can't address the point and as usual you want it to be my fault :) 

    There's no bias in pointing out the very REAL fact that there's a huge difference between calling out a politician for his glaring failures in not having the GIANT FIRE FIGHTING RESIVOIR fixed for over a year and how that affects a fire,  and actually cheering the death of children and women caught up in a weather event. 

    And if you can't tell the difference between them that says all we need to know about you. 

  17. 56 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

    You seem to think that all of this needs to be done today...we have until 2035, and we still do not know what is going to happen after trump leaves office, there is to many questions that need to be answered, before our nation needs to get to 5 %....There is thousands of things that need to be done before we spend any new funding, none of that is being done...

    between now and then our economy is going to grow, something you may or may not have taken into account. bottom dollar, is we as a nation are living beyond our means...for decades we have been adding to our debt, covid sent it into over drive and nobody even blinked an eye...even when Carney announced his 90 plus bil deficit for this year alone, nobody blinked, ya a few spoke up, but for the most part crickets...until we decide to spend on the military,and now we are going into crises mode, we will wreck the economy...sound about right....i mean it is ok to starve them for decades, but don't spend any real money on them...that is the line in the sand that has been there since the korean war ended...

    It can be done, if there is a will, if you can't be done with cuts then raise taxes....and Carney is going to try...will he be successful who knows..."I'm" not doing anything, Carney is doing all of it, remember him the international banking and finance guru, he has put his signature down on the new NATO agreement, plus signed a new European defensive pact, which no one really knows what that is going to cost but it is not going to be cheap...MTF on that little forgotten piece...

    We as a nation have a long history of not living up to our signed on to obligations....frankly the world is shocked that we met our 2 % goal....our allieds already have our reputation cemented in stone, we are not reliable in any form...the world is not depending on Canada for anything, well except the palestinians and their need for condoms...or gender study programs...Everyone thinks the world loves Canada we are peaceful and polite....no world leaders know we are laggards in every way...do you think Carney or PP is going to change that, not on your life...

     It may be stupid, even crazy at times, i would have thought that having the liberals govern for 4 terms would be crazy, after all they done, and poof here we are, right in the middle of crazy town....home or the lagards, and liars....A large part of me have been waiting for this moment in history for 4 decades now, it is here closer than it has ever been....and i'm willing to pay extra taxes to make all of this happen....and if it does happen Carney will have my vote for life...

    As for the governor general bless her sole but she likes to spend money....and your preference is your choice...but the next Forrest fire or flood or whatever maybe she could drive people out of the danger areas in her car...or join August and peddle out on bikes....I understand what the office is and what it does, i pledged allegiance to her office and served it for 35 years...what i don't understand is her need to travel the globe and enjoy the life of riley on my tax dollar...

    Canadians have already made up their minds and elected a man that is taken action of some sort, and to be honest it is a bit refreshing...would i prefer it be conservatives Yes...any ways Carneys yet to prove anything of real value to his voters, or Canadians, that remains to be seen but for me i like what i have seen so far...considering what we have had in the last ten years...

    At one point Canada will have to decide what it wants a seat at the big boys table or in the nosebleed seats like we are now...our international reputation is in taters, our word means nothing, and we are pushed around like some 2 year old....our nation is one huge dumpster fire, our neighbor and biggest trade partner wants swallow us whole for our own good...our allieds just look and stare at us " thankful" it is not them with that many problems the left can't or won't see the problems... and when you point them out the take an epileptic fit and spaz out on the floor, screaming so they can't hear you... ....to them everything is fine...did i miss anything...oh ya, we all get along....as august kindly reminds all of us...

    Only this time i hope NATO punishes those that have not kept their words and kicks out lagard nations out of the alliance, of course that would start a landslide to include NORAD, 5 eyes, European pacts...but hey at least will have the governor general.  

     

    You are in way too far over your head for this discussion

    The economy may grow? Did you puzzle out the fact that if it does that means our GDP goes up which means we need to pay more money?

    This is why the military gets ignored. Instead of making a sensible plan that we can live with we're talking in real terms you make bullshit statements without understanding the nature of what you're discussing.

    Do you know who else is going to be gone by 2035? The guy who made the promise. So one of two things are going to happen. Either he's not going to try at all, and will instead just pay consultants who are friends of his to run around and think about how we might spend the money, or he's going to do some token things or make promises about spending that will happen even further down the road. If you're very lucky a tiny number of things might get better but it won't for the most part

     

    Well I tell you what. Let's wait and see who which of us is right. Within two years it should be obvious either we've made commitments for future spending or we haven't. But the simple fact of the matter is you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about and most of the stuff you said is just as bonkers as the people that claim we don't need a military at all. And then you're going to cry about how we don't spend enough on the military when people who are aware of how spending works are telling you about the problems but you've ignored it.

    Good luck

    • Downvote 1
  18. 2 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

    You  are making me laugh every time you bite the hook when being trolled.... "your stupidity and mental health issues" keep you coming back to be made a fool of every time.

    Keep on coming fish LOL

    Kid everybody can see your crying. :)  Even army guy who's not all that fond of me pointed out that you're messed up. And everybody else's commented on it too.

    This is tearing you up inside, and you spend night and day thinking about me and polly ever for some reason. And your response is to some people where my name wasn't even brought up originally you suddenly go off on ransom about me as if the previous person was speaking about me. And they never did.

    You are truly a mess :) 

    • Downvote 1
  19. 4 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

    An absolute tragedy and nightmare for those affected...  I can only imagine the grief that parents are dealing with right now. Truly devastating....

    Your comments on liberals however is somewhat disingenuous don't you think?  I seem to recall some *sshole who wears orange make-up blaming "Newscum" and democrats for the LA fires, which were also weather related.  But guessing that's different....

    The posts you show are from individuals.  Let's see how many elected democrat officials are as crass as Trump was. 

    The difference was that the LA fires were specifically far worse than necessary because of choices that the governor made not to repair water wells and reservoirs that were needed to fight it. He let them sit dry for over a year instead of repairing them and that's why the fires were that bad..

    But even then there's no comparison. Blaming a politician for not having their state readys one thing and perhaps fair game. But these people are legitimately straight up saying the people who died deserved what they got. Not the politicians, not the governor, but the people who died. Texans. Texas deserves this happening to it.

    I'm sure even you with your low moral standards could see the difference. Reveling in the fact that people are dead is not okay especially when it's not just one or two people here or there but where it seems like a group by large is thinking the same way. It would seem that the left is rushing to revel in the blood of children, there were freaking girl scouts at camp and stuff who died and they're thrilled about it.

    • Like 1
  20. 50 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

     

    Still biting at the lure I see Ha Ha Ha.  I don't even have to use bait to get you on the hook anymore LOL

    Great...you finally got it. That is what I been trying to tell you for a very long time

    Talking down to you is becoming more and more of a challenge but...it is still entertaining though LOL

    PP entertaining the Alberta crowds LOL

    ppandgopher.thumb.jpg.a90db999957b64587f7eec83ac851a81.jpg

     

    May be an image of text that says 'HE (pp) )VOTED NO TO INCREASE NATO DEFENCE SPENDING to 2% in 2022 EH CANADA, EH USA: GOOD, BADLY, & UGLY! VOTED NO DEFENCE BUDGET 2022 VOTED NO UKRAINE AID 2023 p blasted Trudeau for not committing to 2% of GDP (NATO Target) on defence spending (NATO 2024 T, April 6, 2022: VOTED NO O Commons Motion to increase defence spending to 2% of GDP (NATO target)'

    I mean take a look at this. You're obviously petrified of the guy. You're desperate and practically crying and begging.

    You're trying to post silly pictures of him in a clown suit, and a whole bunch of lies that simply aren't true or completely out of context, and you're doing this to adults who know what you're doing. We can all see that your post is completely full of bullshit and they're desperate cry for help and attention.

    This guy scares the pants off you

    49 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

    Yup...41% trump...I mean PP :)

    , you can't even address the point. You're so frightened by Poilievre that you can't even talk about the fact that he got as well as he did like a rational person.

    He lives right free in your brain 24/7 and you're scared as hell of what he's going to do next

    • Like 1
    • Downvote 1
  21. 53 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

    PP did awesome...  Only lost his seat and now has to go to AB to try and find one.

     

    Sure, and that's his embarrassing as he gets. Should never happen. I can totally see how it happened but they got a little complacent and it came back to bite him. But he still got more of the popular vote than any other conservative and almost every other liberal going back to more room.

    Can I think that's what scares you guys the most. Corny one because he scared the NDP voters into voting liberal and because jagmeet basically sold his party out for a pension. But that isn't likely to happen again. Where is Poilievre finished at the same has he's been pulling for the last year. And it won't be hard for him to get his numbers back up into that range.

    Once the NDP selects a new leader carney could be in real trouble considering he's already beginning to slip. By the time he has to deliver another budget next April it may be possible for the other parties to bring him down and run an election, the NDP will be very eager to get some seats back and get official party status and the conservatives will be gunning for the majority they should have had the first time.

    But because you can't cope with that concept you simply bring up something relatively childish rather than address the fact that he did in fact get such a large percent of the vote

    • Downvote 1
  22. 1 hour ago, Aristides said:

    Put them all in and then we don't have to worry about it. On some electrical lines while you're at it

    That was the whole premise of a cross Canada Energy Corridor.

×
×
  • Create New...