Americana Antifa

Why? Because kids who don't get sex ed are less likely to tell someone if they've been molested? This pedocon theory at work?

But you won't say exactly what those beliefs are, because that would cover a lot of conservatives. No, that's what Reason10 does. The Nazi Party had government healthcare, so nazis are people who want government healthcare. My stance has always been that neo-nazism is defined by biological essentialism and the belief in conspiracy theories about the Jews that were promoted by the NSDAP. My agenda of opposing bigotry and genocide? Well, sure. I guess you got me there.

So first of all, this is literally one district. This shows how vulnerable you are to right-wing propaganda. Right-wing media will usually highlight one case, then act like this is evidence for a huge systemic problem. They did this with that trans shooter, despite the fact that 99% of shooters are cis. And I'm sure you fell for that. If your argument is that the book bans aren't authoritarian, then you have to prove that at least on average, the books being removed are inappropriate. Also, the article you posted doesn't differentiate between schools. I've read a few of those books and they probably are a bit too much for elementary school, but they're fine for high school. They also all deal with consent, which is the real reason conservatives don't like them. If you make a claim, it's on you to provide the evidence. Again, deflection. You don't care about kids, you just hate trans people. If you cared about kids, you'd be against adults of any gender being alone with kids in public bathrooms. No shit, most drag queens are cis men. If a man cross-dresses, he doesn't become a woman. I'd give a bunch of details about her, including that she's trans, because some people seem to care about that. But so what? I'd also probably talk about her hobbies and education. You seem to think that a woman isn't really a woman unless they conform to your specific view of womanhood. Like a woman isn't a real woman if she likes anime or wrestling. A redhaired-woman is a redhaired-woman! But they have both been gendered. Humans have been gendering non-humans ever since gender has been a thing. So your definition of "adult human female" is actually very new and inaccurate.

I don't know, maybe I confused you with another angry incel. There's a couple of them here. But you did refuse to define modern nazism in this thread. You pretended that only the NSDAP were nazis. And then everyone clapped. But they also acknowledge neo-nazis. Webster's Dictionary has the original definition, a member of the NSDAP, but also defines a nazi as: one who espouses the beliefs and policies of the German Nazis. Now there is some grey area here. Exactly how similar does someone's politics need to be to the original Nazi Party to be considered a nazi? Pretty much nobody still believes in Pan-Germanism or Nordicism, including people who self-identify as nazis. I think the definition that has the most accuracy and utility is someone who believes in biological essentialism and conspiracy theories about the Jews being behind "cultural marxism."

I did ask you, but you deflected like conservatives usually do. The fake laughing doesn't fool anyone. ? Well, you dishonestly only posted one of the definitions. Most dictionaries define nazism both by the beliefs of the original Nazi Party and by the beliefs of modern era neo-nazis. But you don't want to condemn today's nazis, so you just pretend they don't exist.

Do you have any evidence of that? I'm guessing not, because I asked you for evidence multiple times and you failed to provide any. Deflection. The point is if you cared about children, you wouldn't want children alone in public bathrooms without their parents. You don't care about kids, you're just using kids to fear-monger about trans people. Do you care that you're wrong about this? And do you care that today, most people recognize trans identity? Even if you were correct about the past, words change. Often in ways that help with utility. Well according to your inconsistent and weirdo definition, the answer is no. Wonder Woman isn't an "adult human female" because she's not human, she's an amazon. Thor wouldn't be a man, because he's not human either. But if Marvel made a movie where Thor was gender-swapped, conservative heads would explode. Because y'all don't believe your own talking-points.

Nope, you posed memes the claim the NSDAP was left-wing. You've been unable to say exactly what beliefs define nazism. And that's because you just use the word as a generic insult.

So I looked into this and CBS actually fired the people in charge of authenticating the documents. See, that's what happens in a real news network. If people fail to maintain the standards, they get fired. But with Fox, nobody gets fired for failing to authenticate stories because all of the stories are lies.

Other networks get things wrong, but they haven't been caught admitting that they don't believe their own stories.

You're (willfully) misunderstanding. Conservatives are banning books from schools and pretending it's because the books are sexually explicit. So yes, the book bans are real, but the books aren't actually sexually explicit. Have there been one or two cases where an inappropriate book was found and removed? Maybe. Mistakes do happen. But there's no evidence that the hundreds upon hundreds of banned books have all been pornographic or in other ways inappropriate. If you really think this, then do you also think grown women shouldn't be in the same public bathroom as little girls? I think the real issue here is adults shouldn't allow their young kids to go to the bathroom alone in a public area. Adults kidnap or molest kids of the same gender all the time. But this isn't really about protecting kids, just is just an excuse to be transphobic. That's just not true. Society has always gendered fictional characters and inanimate objects. By your own definition of "adult human female" then Wonder Woman wouldn't be a woman. And like I said, there have always been societies with more than two genders. Also, the majority of people in both America and Canada accept trans identity. So even today, if we're going by percentage, then we should go by my definition of woman. I got the numbers on my side, BAY-BAY! Is this not a woman?! The difference is that ISIS is an organization that demands terrorism. Antifa is an anti-fascist movement which operates peacefully 90% of the time. No, I understand your bigotry, I'm saying it's inconsistent. You're saying that if someone tells you Tiffany is a woman, you shouldn't have to ask if she has a penis because the label should tell you everything you need to know. But that's not how labels work. There are many different kinds of women.

Nobody actually did. When fascists are asked what a fascist or a nazi is, they usually just start listing left-wing traits. In an attempt to project. Reason10 posted a bunch of memes which basically said the nazis were left-wing because they had healthcare. Which doesn't actually answer the question. You actually said my definition was pretty good. But you get so angry with me, that sometimes you can't admit when we agree. I just chalk it up to you being an angry incel. Sure, those were the original nazis, but when people use the word today, they're not talking about the NSDAP. They're talking about neo-nazis. Obviously, I don't think everyone in today's nazi movement is old enough to have been a member of the NSDAP. But I'm guessing you have to use this definition because, while you're not a nazi, you know that a very large portion of the Right is. This is also why right-wing media claimed that recent nazi shooter wasn't really a nazi. You realize that you need these people to win elections.

Yeeeeeeeah, but we both know that's just projection on your part. When you get mad, you do the fake laughing thing. You go Joker mode, as the kids say.

Well, that's what the TV tells you, so I guess you have to believe that.

You looked desperate for attention, so I figured I'd reply to your comment.

Beat up over what? I'm not a Biden fan either, I was supporting Bernie. But I'm still happy Biden beat Trump.

So you don't know what a nazi is either? Am I the only one here who does?

Because I accept that Biden won?

So no answer.

Even after the people who work at Fox got caught admitting they're lying on air?

U mad?

Do you think that it's kind of strange that these books with sexual stories don't actually seem to exist? Shouldn't there be some evidence that the removed books had sexual stories? My narrative has always been that right-wing media is lying. Just like with the Satanic Panic and McCarthyism, they're lying about groomers in order to push a moral panic on the public. In this case, they're trying to associate grooming with the existence of queer people. Ohhhhh dear. ? I hate to be the one to tell you this, but society has always recognized the difference between sex and gender. Even Europe has had societies that recognize three genders. And we've always gendered non-human things, whether inanimate objects or fictional characters. Again, you're unintentionally proving that we need more gender theory classes. So sad that you have to resort to lying because you know you're wrong. So basically, you're saying every woman should be exactly the same or the term means nothing. I shouldn't have to guess whether Tiffany is white or black. I shouldn't have to ask if Tiffany has long blonde hair or short red hair. If you say "woman" that should tell me all I need to know. By your logic, all labels are totally useless because they all have diversity.

Consider the source.

Do you have any evidence that "sexual stories" are being taught as part of Sex Ed? Sometimes they're incorrectly used interchangeably, but that's beside the point. The point if these are two different concepts. So then shouldn't we go by what has the most utility? It sounds like you want language to be more complicated to fit your weird hang up on trans people.