robosmith

So you argument boils down to, because you can't understand the reasons given why Sanford's thesis is erroneous, you're just going to believe him ON FAITH, right?

I don't think we can ever "suffer withdrawal" from the brain damage that lead fumes causes. I've long suspected it was responsible for most of any statistical intellectual disability of inner city dwellers.

Sorry, but I'm not here to take your stupid "test," just like you refuse to provide evidence for YOUR CLAIMS and arbitrarily dismiss ALL evidence proving them wrong. I learned enough simple arithmetic in 1st grade to compute your answer. Of course I didn't understand why others claimed difficulty with solving "story problems." LMAO That you believe your "test" is difficult only reveals YOUR IQ. Frankly, I'd expected better from you. But now I understand why you so often resort to name calling and denigrating terms.

Except for one thing, you own video cite says there is an 84.38% exact match of nucleotides. So your bolded statement is NOT TRUE. Any exact match strongly indicates common ancestry, cause coincident common evolution is relatively much more improbable.

Is ^this simple arithmetic a statistician's idea of an IQ test? LMAO

No, I never bothered to join. I've got better things to do. Like correct your misinterpretations. It's full time job.

Of course YOUR OWN CITE proves she was NOT Aunt Jemima. It says she was "the 1st" ACTOR who PLAYED THE PART as a corporate SHILL.

I certainly do know. That is the standard for admittance to Mensa. Or YOU....

How is your calendar working? Seems like it's either broken or you have yet to learn how to read it. Your deadline passed and little has changed. As for mail in ballots, NO ONE has proven they are insecure. Esp NOT YOU.

Well, I did a little research on your creation.com sources, and found this which thoroughly REFUTES them: Assessing Limits to Evolution and to Natural Selection: Reviews of Michael Behe’s “Edge of Evolution” and John Sanford’s “Genetic Entropy” I will read that BEFORE I watch your video which you have not even summarized.

Too bad neither you nor Trump have ANY evidence of fraudulent vote counts. Trump tried and FAILED to prove that in court 60+ times.

Geological time on Earth? Do you know that life can survive in the rocks and ice of asteroids and comets? The evolution of life is NOT confined to this planet. Certainly the building blocks can arrive here from elsewhere. Not that that is necessary. It is entirely likely that your expert was biased and made invalid assumptions in his statistical analysis. The FACT is, we see empirical EVIDENCE of the progress of the evolution of life over time right here on Earth. Complex animals such as man did NOT just suddenly appear in the fossil record. There is a record of the evolution of primates that preceded man. IF the beginning of life takes much much longer, then primitives forms COULD have arrived here from space.

Right off the top of my head, I can offer 2 possibilities for "Doppelganger genes." One is the gene developed in a common ancestor and was strongly preserved because it gave a crucial survival advantage. Another is, the same genetic structure evolved independently, again because it gave a crucial survival advantage. Another problem with ^this is, death is most definitely an empirically proven process, No empirical evidence for the FAITH of life after death as described in the that book of MYTHS.

No one was expecting a "blue wave." duh

I get that you won't be voting for ANY US pol. You mean the protest that was costing $multi-millions in lost production? Breaking that up was a CAPITALIST move. You are confused. You are delusional if you believe Joe directs antifa. You can't even NAME any of them. Sorry, you'll have to put me on ignore if you can't take the heat.

Your PREDICTIONS and OPINIONS are never reality. Keep trying and maybe one day.....

^More evidence of your stumpification.

Yep, and ^this is evidence you're stumped for an intelligent response on a daily basis.

Sorry, but ALL of ^this is just opinion. An opinion based on the tenet that "if WE don't understand exactly how it happened, then god did it." Your empirical evidence ONLY proves those things exist, NOT that any particular mechanism was responsible for creating it. In fact WE KNOW that those creatures were "created" by their parents and THEIR DNA was inherited and went through continual random changes over EONS.

^This is ridiculous. "Reality" DEPENDS on empirical evidence. The IDEA of "god" IS anti-reality because there is NO EMPIRICAL evidence for its existence (nor for its absence). All you have is your FAITH, which requires NO empirical evidence to keep believing. God is ONLY "reality" in your mind. In REALITY, climate change is "pushed" by climate scientists who understand the empirical EVIDENCE. Joel Kotkin is NOT an expert on climate science:

I'm just fine revealing my IQ score is well over 140.

Meanwhile you'll vote for the fascist traitor who sent his mob to overturn the election (and hang Mike Pence).

No, she's planning to ignore the count and have the legislature determine the winner. Ez Pz

Don't kid yourself. It's obvious you live in the right wing echo chamber because you "know" things with NO EVIDENCE.

Yes, REALLY. All you post here is CRAP.