robosmith

^More evidence of your stumpification.

Yep, and ^this is evidence you're stumped for an intelligent response on a daily basis.

Sorry, but ALL of ^this is just opinion. An opinion based on the tenet that "if WE don't understand exactly how it happened, then god did it." Your empirical evidence ONLY proves those things exist, NOT that any particular mechanism was responsible for creating it. In fact WE KNOW that those creatures were "created" by their parents and THEIR DNA was inherited and went through continual random changes over EONS.

^This is ridiculous. "Reality" DEPENDS on empirical evidence. The IDEA of "god" IS anti-reality because there is NO EMPIRICAL evidence for its existence (nor for its absence). All you have is your FAITH, which requires NO empirical evidence to keep believing. God is ONLY "reality" in your mind. In REALITY, climate change is "pushed" by climate scientists who understand the empirical EVIDENCE. Joel Kotkin is NOT an expert on climate science:

I'm just fine revealing my IQ score is well over 140.

Meanwhile you'll vote for the fascist traitor who sent his mob to overturn the election (and hang Mike Pence).

No, she's planning to ignore the count and have the legislature determine the winner. Ez Pz

Don't kid yourself. It's obvious you live in the right wing echo chamber because you "know" things with NO EVIDENCE.

Yes, REALLY. All you post here is CRAP.

There is NOTHING "funny" about the unprecedented current RATE of change. In the very distant past, the climate was KNOWN to change due to phenomena like mega-volcanos we have not seen in recorded history. Of course theories are PART of SCIENCE. And evidence CONFIRMS THEM. And experiments and evidence is gathered based on THEORIES. There is AMPLE evidence, which is WHY the majority of climate scientist subscribe to the theory Who are you to dispute ACTUAL CLIMATE SCIENTISTS? Do you even have a degree in science? I do. We know that old canard. The 97% of CO2 is biological which is continually recycled. You don't even understand why that makes it different than fossil fuel burning CO2. Only that 3% is what is increasing the concentration in the ATMOSPHERE. It is GIGA-TONS per year. Says you. Yes we know you believe in the magic of god, and ignorantly excuse what man is doing to destroy the environment.

Just because YOU distrust the government is NOT evidence their programs and data is corrupt. If you can arbitrarily any source you don't like, then anyone can do the SAME with YOUR sources.

^Pure projection. ?

We know you DON'T

No chain of custody proving that laptop is "real" and not faked by Russian agents. Delaware LAW was violated when/if ANYTHING was leaked from ANYONE'S laptop at that service shop. Of course we know that you don't care about the fruit of a poisonous tree when it serves your agenda; just part of your defense of fraudulent.

Nothing ^here of substance. No reason to believe ^this opinion.

The printers worked. The ink was too light to be read by the scanners. So it took a couple of hours to fix it. Republicans: FRAUD! FRAUD! FRAUD! Liars.

Maybe you would know better if YOU had the ELITE KNOWLEDGE of EXPERTS.

Nevada law allows mail in ballots to be counted if received by SATURDAY, so they take longer. In a close election, ballots sent by overseas servicemen matter and it can take over a week to receive them. You want to deny the soldiers their vote? UnAmerican? Oh, I guess you ARE.

Nope. Since you cannot point to it, it doesn't exist. Here is what YOUR reason.com CITE SAYS: Which beLIES your claim it is highest IN HISTORY. Go ahead and re-demonstrate your dishonesty by LYING AGAIN. Bye Bye ?

Asbestosis Users have NEVER paid the full cost of fossil fuels; particularly the cost of pollution has been externalized onto the general public. And the current and future costs of changing the climate continues to be denied and obfuscated, just like cancer from tobacco and asbestosis lung disease.

What does "no calls" mean? There are numerous vote counts reported and the analysis of experts which tell us the winner with near mathematical certainty (before the actual totals have been collected). Collecting thousands of vote totals reliably and securely is more complex than most people can understand. Esp when the public has been fear mongered into not trusting computers and refuses to invest in a highly secure single system. In one sense, leaving the choice of systems to individual states makes the systems more difficult to corrupt since the whole system is much more difficult to hack.

The 4 "steps" by Biden that you cited, have NO EFFECT on current production. You believe that Biden CAN ORDER the private oil companies to increase production? LMAO What Biden HAS done, is commit to restoring the strategic reserves at $70/barrel to ENCOURAGE additional production INVESTMENTS by the oil companies.

I completely understand why you don't want to reveal how biased you are.

Oh, so despite your clear use of double quotation marks, YOU LIED about what Biden said. How about telling the truth and posting WHAT HE SAID, instead of your OBVIOUSLY BIASED INTERPRETATION? Be sure and include the cite, too. Tnx

Google says you're FoS: Your search - "UNLESS WE MAINTAIN FULL CONTROL OF THE SENATE AND CONGRESS ... - did not match any documents.