James99

I'm reading through this conversation 3 months later because it is a topic that interests me. I had to respond to you because your comment is so ignorant. I didn't miss any point. You are trying to discredit the US by saying that the Canadians burned the White House. Which is not true.

There already are background checks. I don't know if you have ever purchased a firearm. There are already 1000s of laws on state a federal levels, what controls are you talking about that will make such a difference. A gun on site held by a responsible and trained teacher or security gaurd is a deterrent and a start. Not making the shooters famous would be a good benchmark as well. Lastly, we need to address the mental aspect and how to limit it's causes- that is that these shooters mostly come from broken homes and parents who create a toxic environment for their kids.

Lol yeah except that the Brits did.

Situational ethics and reality? There is what is true and what is not true. Taking the life from an innocent human being is wrong. That is a truth. You can argue that this statement is false and that you can take the life of an innocent human being or you can argue that it is not yet a life. Where did I ever say you should belch out babies from hs on? I believe in responsible sex and I 100% agree that children should be born into a family where the parents are married. We are more at risk of underpopulation. To sustain our current population, there need to be more births.

Terms of employment?? These people do not work for the government. Many even own independent businesses. Terms of employment I agree with as that is a private business. They can do what they want. This is a government overstepping by mandating a vaccine or lose the livelihood that you have built. I do not need to answer and question that is as ignorant as yours. You clearly don't respect working people and their jobs. Any that do will understand what is meant by force in this context.

Taking a human life is never justified as I am sure you would agree. I just want to know when they become a human life. Does making decisions qualify them as being a human life and then we cannot kill them? Because I would say that some handicapped adults cannot make decisions (coma). Is there something else that kicks off the human life?

Eyeball, the phrases dispensable as any other worker, just get another job, and saying that is a choice just shows how out of touch you must be. To take away someone's job is to take away their and their family's livelihood. It doesn't seem like you have much respect for the working person and their job which means you really don't understand the economy. Your arguments are the real train wreck. You must really be the life the party wherever you go because you seem like such a pleasant fellow. You name call and insult in every other post, it is really the sign of a very educated and happy person.

The economy boomed under Trump. The US was energy independent, US Manufacturing was given its biggest boost in decades as he started a movement of reshoring that is still going on, no wars were started, he negotiated a number of peace treaties abroad, inflation was slowed drastically, US personal savings accounts of the average person was the highest it had been. He may be the only president int he past 25 years who actually truly cared about the country. Why would a billionaire in his 70s run for president and go through all of what he went through. He was already financially secure and famous. If we all went down protecting the lives of millions, I would say that it would be an honorable way to go down. And I really don't think you realize how many people are still pro-life. To kill or not to kill is not a right that should be given.

By saying sure, you agree that if it is their body then they should be able to chose whether they need to take the shot or not. Forcing them into a spot were they would have had to quit their jobs doesn't give them the right to chose. Many of those truckers own their own businesses and trucking is not an easy job, you can't just force them all to quit then replace them. It would be disastrous for the economy.

Their body their choice. Right?

I live in Florida. I can't stress how fortunate we have been with DeSantis and other FL leaders.

He knows what he is doing with the economy, cares about our country, and is pro-life.

I am curious on the argument against this bill. Please elaborate.

That is definitely the way to go about debating issues. Call half the country bozos, dodos, and stupid. Makes you look very intelligent.

What happens at 16 weeks to change from legal to illegal unless for medical reasons? I am curious.

Mary was not impregnated through sex. She miraculously conceived through Gods intercession. And , this doesn't show a need for God to procreate. This conception would only show God's love for the human race. He is not governed by the nature he created, he is not a physical being. He is an immortal spirit and has no need to procreate; he does not engage in physical nature like that.

We were created in God's image in that he is a being with intellect and will. We are also beings with intellect and will. God does not have a body and is not governed by the nature he created. The ancients we're very philosophically curious and therefore in those times that is what the great minds focused their attention on. As you said, they made great progress. And although this philosophical progress was paused with the decline and fall of the Roman empire and the entrance into the dark middle ages, this philosophical curiosity and the ensuing progress in that regard flowered and peaked in the high middle ages or the 1300s. It steadily declined from there with focus shifting towards science and the harnessing of nature's power to ease the lives of the human race ( the industrial revolution. ) Those philosophers from the 1300s would tell you that we are made to God's image in that we are beings with intellect and will. j

I did not specify because of what we were discussing. But I should have written the main reason for sex is to procreate. Procreation being the MAIN reason cannot be argued and I'm sure you agree. Providing comfort and companionship to those that have sex is secondary. They are in place to ensure that humans do have sex and procreate. If the only thing that sex did was procreate then Humans would be much less likely to do it and there would be risk of an end to the human race. Nature, designed by a wise God, gives us these desires that to ensure continuation.

I knew that you would pull something like that. I specifically said at the end that reasons for war are almost always cruel and selfish. What we were discussing was whether or not reducing the population was the reason for going into a major war. I agree it's awful. "Old men start wars and young men fight them." Not the sickness of the young that die in war. I wouldn't argue that.

Hating something because it jeopardizes something you love is a completely natural and exists in most people to some degree. Racism is hating or discriminating against someone because of their skin color alone and is always wrong; not hating someone for jeopardizing what they love. Unless the entire white race is involved. What is the white race jeopardizing?

I am pointing out that the fact that whites fighting for the unborn do not factor that in with their decision in the slightest. I would not ask if an old man that defended his wife from an attacker was aware that he would live less long because he is exerting himself so physically at his age.

Look at a chart of populations. If the plan was to reduce populations it very much did the opposite. Population spikes followed most of not all major wars (major meaning involving enough people to create a noticeable reduction in the population). In addition to that the greatest leaps and bounds in medicine, machine technology, science have occurred during major wars. These discoveries and inventions have started domino effects that allow humans to live longer and safer lives and procreate easier and safer. Both of which increase the population. Though most wars are started for selfish or cruel reasons reducing the population is extremely rarely if not never the end goal.

French Patriot in all your posts you are very much showing your racist hatred. As harsh a word as hypocrite is, I think it is deserved here.

This is completely irrelevant. Killing innocent humans is wrong. Most pro-lifers (I would say all but who knows there may be on work two that don't) are strictly concerned with the lives being taken regardless of what it does to different races. Whites, blacks, Hispanic- we are all humans and are all Americans. We are more alike than we are different.

On good faith? The reason for sex is to procreate. And nature, having been created by a wise God, is what gives us the desire to have sex. If we did not need to procreate we would not have sexual desires. Bisexual and gay being right aside, God does not need to procreate and therefore has no need for sex. I can assure you God is not bisexual or gay.