Jump to content

ExFlyer

Senior Member
  • Posts

    12,042
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by ExFlyer

  1. HA HA HA Then it is not the feds..it is your indigenous leadres... I ain't wrong. I am pointing out the truths HA HA HA Then again, why would I even think a LOSER like you would grasp the enormity of your own BS LOL LOL LOL
  2. Awww poor LOSER... Only reason it is derailed is because you keep posting BS LOL LOL LOL Typical LOSER post HA HA HA
  3. HA HA HA. You are talking about a conservative motion that had an amendment that had to be amended by the conservatives themselves and it was voted out.... Yup, if Carney is outmanoeuvred like this all the time.. he will be in power for a long time LOL LOL LOL
  4. Awww poor puppy..... cannot find the topic description and continues to babble LOL Every post just defines you as a LOSER and confirms you are that LOSER LOL Topic is Canadian Defence News..not In Defence of Confux News LOL What A LOSER you are
  5. Yes you do...all Canadians have an indigenous leader we have been paying for, subsidizing and taking care of since before confederation LOL Oh and nope...the feds do not have approval any more. They have downloaded that to the Provinces. https://theconversation.com/why-mark-carneys-pipeline-deal-with-alberta-puts-the-canadian-federation-in-jeopardy-271072 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ottawa-alberta-energy-agreement-pipeline-9.6994715
  6. Like I said..ask your local indigenous leader when the build begins they hold the reins Better yet, ask Conservative Premier Smith when she has gotten a group together to finance and build it LOL
  7. Sad when some compainatives cannot see reality and do not want to read what is put in front of them hence they get real facts LOL Yeah, the pipeline will be finished tomorrow but better yet...contact your local indigenous leader and ask them LOL
  8. OMG...another person that did not read what the motion and amendment and amendment to the amendment states (let alone even read the actual tri lateral MOU Here is is for your edification) LOL https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/backgrounders/2025/11/27/canada-alberta-memorandum-understanding Carneys and Smiths MOU are a document for a way forward that both parties agreed to.... and Smith is a conservative and it was good enough for her ....maybe she should slap PP on his PP and tell him to shut the H up? LOL
  9. Aww shabby, the motion was all show business because the complainatives, especially PP Le Pew, have nothing to offer. The "symbolism" is all PP Le Pew and his constant complaining, whining, crying and cliche dropping banter. He has nothing so, he has to make all his MP's look stupid too. LOL
  10. Wow...you certainly are dense LOL. Clearly you and shabby didn't read the motion or amendment, otherwise you wouldn't make such foolish statements The conservative amendment even had to be amended by the conservatives cause they forgot about the indigenous LOL If it was not binding...why did the conservatives make a motion and then propose amendments and then amend their amendment??? Why did the conservative even make it a vote? Duhhh, yep, another useless complainative blunder HA HA HA
  11. Duhhh, what do you think amendments are...status quo?? No, they are changes...and other objections and omissions. I gave you what the amendments were...here they are again....read em (if you can comprehend) and weep LOL Key Elements of the Recent MOU Amendment Saga (Canada): The Original MOU: A deal between Alberta (Premier Smith) and the Federal Government (PM Carney) for a pipeline to BC, including conditions like Alberta's industrial carbon pricing, Indigenous co-ownership, and B.C. consultation. The Conservative Motion: A non-binding motion to "take note" of the MOU, explicitly mentioning the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act adjustment and Indigenous consultation, but omitting Alberta's climate commitments. The Liberal Response: They voted against it, calling it a political stunt that cherry-picked parts of the deal, even though they support the entire MOU. The Amendment Attempt: Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre then moved to amend their own motion to include Indigenous co-ownership and carbon capture, trying to force a Liberal vote for the whole MOU. " The amendments were changes PP Le Pew wanted. Most had nothing to do with the pipelines LOL The Conservatives pulled another stunt in Parliament today and people deserve to know what actually happened. They brought forward a motion about the federal Alberta pipeline MOU but stripped out major pieces of the real agreement. They left out the Indigenous co ownership commitments. They removed environmental accountability. They ignored terms Alberta itself had agreed to. Then they pretended their watered down version was the real deal. This was never about advancing the project. The motion was non binding. Even if it passed it would not have changed a single thing. It was political theatre meant to create outrage and confusion. And when it failed they immediately tried to spin it as the government blocking the project. That is simply false. If they had presented the full MOU exactly as written the motion would have passed. They chose not to because honesty does not serve their narrative. And let’s be clear about something else. The actual MOU involved real negotiation between Alberta the federal government and Indigenous partners. Some First Nations supported it. Others did not. That is normal when dealing with major infrastructure projects and it is why consultation matters. But the Conservatives decided to interfere and rewrite the agreement for a headline. That choice does more than waste time. It disrespects the communities who engaged in good faith. It sends the message that their concerns and their support can be edited out when politically convenient. This stunt just further insults them. We need to stop rewarding this kind of performative politics. It erodes trust. It undermines real work. It spreads misinformation. And it turns important negotiations into props for partisan outrage. Do not fall for it. Look at the full MOU. Look at who actually negotiated it. And look at who chose to distort it. Canada deserves better than theatrics from politicians who would rather ragebait than inform. Be careful with what you share. Check the facts before repeating claims. Moments like this are exactly when disinformation spreads fast and deliberately. "
  12. It occurs immediately confux posts or retorts to my posts... He went off topic trying to outsmart me on pg 97. All was fine till then. All he has to do is stay on topic. If you look back at all his posts , to anyone, they almost all are insults to the persons he retorts to ( I dare you to and prove me otherwise) except to his buddies...of which you are one. LOL LOL LOL As I have said in the past and say again...you LOSERS stick together, like $hit on a diaper.
  13. I agree with you??? LOL LOL LOL Not a chance LOL LOL LOL "The only thing stupider than complaining about someone's" actions is someone that is even stupider and LOSER....like you HA HA HA OMG LOSER...you just cannot seem to be any more foolish. Every one of your posts are you trying to defend your stupidity LOL LOL LOL Get back on topic LOSER!!!!
  14. The amendments were changes PP Le Pew wanted. Most had nothing to do with the pipelines LOL The Conservatives pulled another stunt in Parliament today and people deserve to know what actually happened. They brought forward a motion about the federal Alberta pipeline MOU but stripped out major pieces of the real agreement. They left out the Indigenous co ownership commitments. They removed environmental accountability. They ignored terms Alberta itself had agreed to. Then they pretended their watered down version was the real deal. This was never about advancing the project. The motion was non binding. Even if it passed it would not have changed a single thing. It was political theatre meant to create outrage and confusion. And when it failed they immediately tried to spin it as the government blocking the project. That is simply false. If they had presented the full MOU exactly as written the motion would have passed. They chose not to because honesty does not serve their narrative. And let’s be clear about something else. The actual MOU involved real negotiation between Alberta the federal government and Indigenous partners. Some First Nations supported it. Others did not. That is normal when dealing with major infrastructure projects and it is why consultation matters. But the Conservatives decided to interfere and rewrite the agreement for a headline. That choice does more than waste time. It disrespects the communities who engaged in good faith. It sends the message that their concerns and their support can be edited out when politically convenient. This stunt just further insults them. We need to stop rewarding this kind of performative politics. It erodes trust. It undermines real work. It spreads misinformation. And it turns important negotiations into props for partisan outrage. Do not fall for it. Look at the full MOU. Look at who actually negotiated it. And look at who chose to distort it. Canada deserves better than theatrics from politicians who would rather ragebait than inform. Be careful with what you share. Check the facts before repeating claims. Moments like this are exactly when disinformation spreads fast and deliberately.
  15. Derail this threat???? HA HA HA. Poor little LOSER...cannot even spell when you have your hissy fits. You have already done this a long time ago...it is you that cannot stay on topic LOL LOL LOL Stop responding and maybe you can get back on topic. Man, you are one sick puppy...must come in concert with being a LOSER!!!!!
  16. Because that is the highest level you can understand HA HA HA Awww poor little LOSER...still trying Eh?? LOL LOL LOL "admission of defeat".... OK, yes, you have been defeated and you can erest in peace LOL LOL LOL
  17. You expected the complainatives to vote against their own amendment?? LOL LOL LOL The complainatives LOSE ...AGAIN!!!! It was the complainative amendment that failed..not the MOU... the MOPU stands HA HA HA I guess I gave you more credit for being intelligent than you actually are LOL LOL LOL The conservatives could be winners and could change the minds of the voters if they get a decent leader.
  18. PP Le Pew Loses Again Complainatives cannot even back their own amendment LOL
  19. HA HA HA the only weird fantasies are in your mind.... LOSERS always behave like you... LOL LOL LOL Stay on topic LOSER if you can get over me LOL LOL LOL
  20. Awww poor little LOSER...still trying Eh?? LOL LOL LOL Hey, it is you claiming I am a child and teenager and you keep playing ...seems that is what a pedophile does and you fully fit that bill so...seems the "weird sexual fantasies" are what you are having HA HA HA
  21. Hey pedophile LOSER...still trying to prove you are an adult... still playing LOL LOL LOL Sad sad little LOSER HA H A HA
  22. Awww, the pedophile is trying to be adult LOL LOL LOL Get over yourself LOSER HA HA HA
  23. I agree that very few get punished. To your point of government offloading duties, well, you are correct. I worked in government. I was hired because I had"special skills and talents". Thing was, once in the government, I was basically made an administrator as were all the people I worked with and probably as all government workers. We hired people to investigate and make recommendations. Then we decided what to suggest to the powers to be. I dare say you cannot find an engineer int he government that actually uses their degree or licence (and that goes for other professions as well). Not sure why they hire professionals and not use their expertise and training. Perhaps so they can blame someone else if things go for a crap? LOL As for building railroads, hydro dams, universities. That was hundreds of years ago (hydro the exception). We are not the same society nor have the same desire for accomplishment. We have so much dissension nowadays we could never do those things again. We cannot make decisions anymore because of all the dissension or disagreement between political parties and special interest groups. Look at how long we have talked about high speed rail and how many studies we have had about it The "200 billions of dollars a year" are budgeted and spent to please us. And every government elected will do whatever to make sure they please us to get elected again. On the topic of scams and punishment (as opposed to your spin on government), there are punishments doled out quite often. Thing is...the people being scammed are rarely, if ever, compensated.
  24. We all know how much you like to play with children and now you finally confirm it. Sad sad little pedophile LOSER.
  25. Boo Hoo. Ya know the topic is Griffen vs American F35 not about you and your ego and paedophilia tendency for getting bested all the time by a "teenage kid"? LOL Every time you post you just confirm what a LOSER you are... HA HA HA
×
×
  • Create New...