ExFlyer

Politics is politics. It has always been a clown show. Mulroney was no better, neither was Chretien or Harper. The only real difference between them and now is the advent of social media. There were always political differences and people that disagreed with government just now, it is instant and easy to be anonymous and bash away. You used to complain and whine to your close circle of friends and neighbours but now anybody can be smarter then the next person and can gather many of their ilk to stroke each other.

Never. I said if she were to broach or break her bail conditions she would be violating them and would suffer the consequences. Cut the whining Dude. She still has to face the charges. She may get off but, she will always have that hanging over her head. May even affect her out of country abilities depending how the country she wants to visit looks upon her charges.

The judge decided she would not jeopardize her bail restrictions. Period. Don't spin this into something it is not. And it is not something LOL Get together with your boyfriends (and Godess too) and stroke yourselves silly

Oh stop. If anything it is the republicans that are far more gun ownership crazy. The gun lobby is a very powerful lobby in the US and they can make or break a politician, regardless of party. " Since 1998, gun rights groups have spent $190 million on lobbying, with 60% of that total being spent in the past nine years. Gun control advocates have spent just $30 million since 1998. Beyond lobbying, gun control groups have contributed $50.5 million to federal candidates and party committees between 1989 and 2022, with the vast majority going to Republicans. They spent especially heavily in the 2020 election, with $16.6 million in outside spending. For 2022, they’ve already contributed $4.4 million, says OpenSecrets, based on its analysis of Federal Election Commission data." https://fortune.com/2022/05/25/nra-contributions-politicians-lobbying-gun-rights-groups-record-2021-ted-cruz/

Once again, she was not charged under anything other than existing Ontario and Ottawa laws. She had bail conditions and had to respect them but, the judge said she was no in contravention of them so, bail was not revoked,. Accept small victiories

Yes, that is what the story is about Captain Obvious LOL. Quit with the Trudeau shit already. He has nothing to do with the Ontario justice system . It is provincial. She is in shit for breaking existing Ontario and Ottawa City laws. Oh and Taxme and West, get a room for gawds sake, you guys drooling over each other gets old, pull in WesCanMan when you need little more variety

Hell no, she is far from a bad person. She is a committed to a cause person. She is though, a dumb person. A court order is a court order. Break it and suffer the wrath of the court. She got lucky and should be grateful for that.

Archie Bunker mentality. Political longevity more important than children's lives I guess.

I am not sure what you think I don't understand? I think, if 2015 is your "change everythign date" that the entire North American political scene changed. We, in Canada, became more American in our political activities and attitudes. We, in Canada, became as adversarial and accusatory as Americans as opposed to our "civilized" previous selves. We certainly had our extremist MP's just as the US had their far left/right congressmen. We had Trudeau Sr for a long time, then Mulroney for a long time, then Chretien for a long time, then Harper for a long time, and now Trudeau for a long time. I think if someone is in power for a long time it creates problems more than it solves. It becomes one persons realm instead of for the people. Look at cities with long time mayors or provincial government with long serving premiers. Same for Prime Ministers. They forget what they are there for and concentrate on staying in power. Maybe of we were forced to change we would look at things differently? Maybe a limit on terms is an option?

Where are the "what is mass shootings" posters now? Where are the mass shooting deniers now? This was not gang or drug related, where are you now?? Where are the deflectors claiming Neo Marxism or other off topic BS now?

The lowering of standards to include not just women but others not fit enough or previously not acceptable is definitely a problem. Not justi in the Military though. Standards have been lowered all over to include those that should not be there and that has jeopardized others within the same job. There was, at one time, women joining or applying for positions just because they could. Many did not last long at all such as those in the infantry, or even fighter pilots. I had many come into Air Force trades, many succeeded in the avionics end of the trades as the jobs we primarily in shops and indoors but in the aviation trades where the work was deployments, outdoors and heavy lifting, they all (not all but many) dwindled away. Quota hiring never made things better, just more difficult for those remaining.

Back to the topic. Another 14 students and 1 teacher shot and killed in a Texas High School I call that a mass shooting. https://ca.news.yahoo.com/gma/texas-elementary-school-reports-active-174500312.html

I think you are over reacting. There is a point he is making. Keeping statistics is not a racist manoeuvre. It is to discover who, what , where and when to discover and potentially assist in reducing or preventing the issues. Collecting statistics is not targeting race, it is collection of all data, regardless of who, what , when and where. It is s the same as medical statistics, the collection is hopefully to prevent further or more or intensification of medical issues.

Show me where I said "trash truckers"?? I never did. Where and in what article of the charter is that stuff?? Rectal plucks do not count

No you did not. You are just making stuff up again. You are quite the expert at that Fact is, I know my rights. Difference between you and I is that I don't imagine stuff in the charter that is not there, I know what is there and is not and, I cannot find anything in the charter that you claim. So, please help me and show me where the "Charter rights to medical discretion" are or is. What paragraph or line or section? I can wait but, I know you cannot find it or respond without defecting so, ....

"multiple examples"?? When the facts came out, all talk stopped except for "you folks" Are you insinuating I am "you folks"?

"charter rights to medical discretion"??? Making up new charter articles now? Now that is pure desperation LOL When did I call them trash? More false news when you don't have good arguments or facts Ha Ha

Who cares about that except you? I never said anything about it and you have to to add so you bring up old news that has been resolved. Sad you are still living months ago.

I think who is trash? The few that hung on for 3 weeks? Yup Respect? I have the utmost respect for truckers, real truckers, those that worked. The real truckers delivered food and goods, wannabes and unemployed were blockading. You live near me? Oh wait, you are making up shit again to assist your narrative. All the truckers had their accounts frozen? Oh no, more BS eh? All the truckers lost their licences? Oh no not that either? More BS. Publicly humiliated?? Really? Who? The ones that chose to make asses of themselves publicly humiliated themselves. Oh and the one still in jail really gives the truckers a real good example of what they were all about LOL As I said, you guys are so funny. You have nothing, zero, zip, live in the past, but you do keep trying. Even the truckers have moved on, leaving only the 6 or so of you on this forum to carry the torch.

HA HA HA You sure do know how to spin a yarn Sad thing is you believe your own yarns. Ha Ha Ha

You guys are just too funny. Justifying a lost cause. Hanging in with losers of the decade. Your lives must be sad if you still cling to trucker trash. As long as you spin, I will dance with you. Whether I agree with your points or not, I will do my best to make you comment and make up more stuff

Ouch, you are so good at throwing insults.... NOT. Surely you can come up with better that ?

Ouch...you are hurting my feelings ... NOT. I apologize for no one and no thing. If you are stupid enough to flaunt the law, well, they will get you and they did. The apologist is you for defending an idiot. You are all wound up about some trucker hero chick, what about her idiot buddy still festering in jail because he cannot find a lawyer to defend or represent him just to get out on bail?? You trucker fanboys are not up in arms about him? Why? He is as stupid as everyone thinks and may take down your trucker convoy mantra??

Dude, get a timeline. Before and just before they got punted. Pretty simple. The convoy was not under any impression of anything except staying warm while drinking beer There is no such charge as "political ploy". I do not know what she is charged under and, as I said before, neither do you. You can disagree with me all you want but the fact is, she is charged and now maybe in breach of bail. Sucks to be her and so sad for you worshipping her.

Oh, cut it out LOL The truckers did nothing except be a pain in the as*. They are now yesterdays news and with the exception of a few hero worshippers here, lost as a pencil point in history.. The restrictions were announced to be lifted before the truckers even began their circus LOL Absolutely nothing unconstitutional went on... get over your false news Ha Ha Ha