Jump to content

ExFlyer

Senior Member
  • Posts

    12,038
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by ExFlyer

  1. Wrong again Says the conservitive troll LOL
  2. That his relatives were being intimidated by the chinese. That he was receiving money from dubious sources. It was his claims as he said in parliament.. I do not apologize for anyone but also do not drape myself in ant political blanket. No, I can read quite well. Partisanship is easily detected LOL
  3. My point is that Chong was aware. If his family and relatives were targeted, you think he did not know. You think he and his staff did not know where every penny came from? If you think that then you are the one full of shit.
  4. You a member of Chin's staff?? LOL In one post you question "Why would he know where the anti-Chong messages are coming from? How would he know what money is being funneled to whom? " and now defend my position by saying foreign governments interfere??
  5. Are you serious??? A candidate and his staff have to know where every penny comes form. As well, if relatives in hong kong are being intimidated, you think he does not know?
  6. They? The point I was making is that if the chinese were "intimidating" him and his family and he and his staff, managers et all were totally unaware, well, I find that hard to believe. If he told anyone, I am sure action would have been taken during the campaign. For him to say he knew nothing is, in my opinion, false.
  7. For sure, the government agencies kept everyone in the dark. As for Chong, I think he knew and did nothing, let alone report it. If he would have reported it, we all would have heard about it long before this.
  8. I agree. Thing is though, the talk is sounding like he did not know and this was all a revelation. We govern ourselves quite well. Political "interference" or "influencing" is an accepted tradition in any democracy. Be it the chinese, the americans or any corporation looking for something. Acting surprised is just show business. As for Chong, he had to know all along and tried to make political hay but it is backfiring.
  9. Are you saying Michael Chongs relatives were being intimated? Are you saying he did know about chinese interference in his campaign?
  10. Why did Michael Chong, his campaign, his managers or his staff not know anything about this at the time it was happeneng? If the Chinese were directly targeting him and he did not know a thing until years after when CSIS mentioned it? How is that??
  11. Oh stop. If you has d some sort of point, I would address it. All you do is belittle and call people that disagree with you a liberal or, you obfuscate the issue. It is becoming less and less viable to have any type of conversation with you. That is evident by your reaction to almost every person you interact with. Your attempt at making everyone you disagree with a liberal is actually quite humorous and only displays your total disregard to other opinions. Such as it is. You are what your are.
  12. Absolutely nothing. Thing is, they are not built overnight, if and when they can get all the regulatory issues resolved. Then there is the cost. In Ontario alone,we know that the cost of solar and wind generated electricity is not viable, cost effective and affordable.
  13. No pout at all. Your partisanship only blinds you. Once again, no Canadian government has met it's target. When you come to the realization of that truth, maybe you can have the adult conversation you so wantonly desire LOL
  14. As I said to you earlier. I do not need your agreement nor approval. I stand by my no Canadian government has met it's target comment, as it is a well known fact
  15. Look, even when Harper was in power, we failed to meet our climate obligations. Like it or not, play your partisan gamesmanship all you want, fact is all Canadian governments failed. You are determined to ignore my point that they failed to meet internationally agreed upon targets. No pouting. Prove to me that Canada met any of targets it has set out. They just keep moving the milestone out farther. "Canada has had nine climate plans since 1990 and has failed to hit any of the targets in them." https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/climate-change-canada-emissions-1.6397776 The "issue raised" is that Saskatchewan will continue to use coal to generate electricity and I think they will. I also said that the government, whomever they will be, cannot do anything about it as Saskatchewan has no other means to produce electricity. So, the threat is meaningless.
  16. Many things can be done "theoretically" but, The Prairie provinces have no alternative electrical producing capability. Cut off gas and coal, turn out the lights.
  17. Look, my point was and is, all Canadian governments have failed, and that included Harpers. https://thenarwhal.ca/harper-s-timeline-canada-climate-change-2006-2014/
  18. after extension, after extension and so on and so on. Point is, the feds (of all stripes) can not, have not and will not meet their own climate targets so they cannot punish any or group or province for not meeting the ones the feds set.
  19. Give it up. Using your precious book selective is the forte of bible thumpers. When called out, back peddle, confuse and make other stuff up to try and make your points. All BS.
  20. When you make comments like "I don't try to judge what laws Israel had 3,000 years ago in a totally different dispensation and period. " and in fact your laws are 3000 years old." Point was and still is " Your bible of today is more than 1/2 about old testament which is the laws of Israel had 3000 years ago ". Nice back pedalling LOL
  21. Your bible of today is more than 1/2 about old testament which is the laws of Israel had 3000 years ago isn't it? Pulling things without context is the forte of bible thumpers LOL
  22. Give more??? Wake up and smell the surveillance dude. Ya can't hide, even to have a dump. It is here already LOL But hey, if ya ain't done nuthin wrong, who cares??
  23. You said "And he often is." with more and I was Jjst responding to your pattern of changing because the other is better. My intent by saying party faithful is by being party members. I am pretty sure non cons would not buy memberships to stuff the ballots for leaders LOL Or are you implying otherwise?
  24. HA HA HA. You are the paranoid one claiming if you use cash you can slide around unnoticed...Ha Ha Ha And you attack me?? LOL. I could not care less about you. but watch out......
  25. So, by your pattern, Justin was better than Harper? LOL I agree we should not be picking a worse person but, the party faithful are the ones selecting the leaders.
×
×
  • Create New...