ExFlyer

Lie? About what? All I ask is for you to prove yourself and your baseless accusation and assumptions. If what you just posted is your defence, you lose LOL Seems you cannot prove anything, so much smoke, so little fire. Smouldering in your hearsay.LOL

Prove your baseless accusations.... go ahead, try. LOL

There you go again with baseless accusations. I have to admit, you are definitely expert at it LOL

I read your posts and I never accused you of anything. My discussions were with another poster. I have never told anyone on this forum anything about what Justin says or defended Justin. I can say the same about PP. I did say, and stand by it that "I believe, all politicians "lie". Be they white lies, broken promises, by omission or misinterpretations. They are not exclusively owned by any political party. "

Where and when did I say irrelevant? My point was a media person would not like the bill.

Ha! Was just gonna post that. That'll be the day I tip at a beer fridge at a ball park LOL

Nope, that is just your take on it. BTW, I am allowed to have an opinion, just iike you. I am also allowed to make observations, just like you. Do not feel deprived. Tit for tat

Says a media person. ?

No, it is an observation. No facts, just accusation is just hot air, worthless

As i said, discussing this with you is not tenable any more. Your political stance is singular and reasonable discussion cannot be held. Disagreement with some of what you say only leads you to demeaning folks. Very Democrat/Republican behaviour of you. Done with this subject with you. See you on another topic.

Again, an opinion. As I already said "I cannot control how you perceive a post or discussion but it is clearly with a jaundiced eye. To call someone elses post bullshit only indicated your disagreement,"

Yes. Making accusation based on ones opinion without positive proof is well, irrelevant. And yes.

Look, I cannot control how you perceive a post or discussion but it is clearly with a jaundiced eye. To call someone elses post bullshit only indicated your disagreement, as I said. Read your post, full of accusations and If's.

Look, I am not a liberal, party member or supporter. I find, especially on this forum, one seems to have to be identified as supporting one political party or another and if not, you are a nazi, communist or other derogatory thing. I believe, all politicians "lie". Be they white lies, broken promises, by omission or misinterpretations. They are not exclusively owned by any political party. I have no doubt that any politician that has anything to say does not have a CYA factor. If I had a subordinate (and I have) that was constantly BSing about him (or her) self, I could not care less. Now, if it was BS about the condition or state of an aircraft or harmful to others, then certainly there would be harsh discussions and consequences. Thing is, you need to have very solid and positive proof of accusations. Not opinions, hearsay and conjecture. "Depending on the moral theory used, lying in special circumstances (for example, “white” lies or lies that benefit others or avert harm) might be morally justifiable. Other lies, as lying about one's age in order to get access to age-restricted goods, are most often immoral. https://daily-philosophy.com/is-lying-ethical/

Yes, some change every day. Murder, torture, incest, to name a few do not change. Peoples perspectives and therefore what was considered immoral last year, may not be today. Cancel culture and wokeness prove that regularly. We treated a conquered people one way for several hundred years and today it is considered immoral. Politics and opinions about corruption are not a morality issue. Demeaning spmeone because they do not agree with some things being said does not make them an immoral person, just means they disagree with what, or the way someone else portrays things.

It's there but, they can still respond to you.

OK. I understand your opinion. Any discussion on this only becomes a personal opinion against a personal opinion. That is all.

Not sure what you are trying to say? I do not, in any way think Trudeau "is the entirety of government". As I said, "Does anyone here in their right mind really think Trudeau has anything to do with what is on a stamp? " If you do, give your head a shake LOL

Do you truly think Trudeau has anything to do with what is on a stamp? If so, you are a lot more foolish and naive than even I give you credit for, LOL

"the Coat of Arms with the Tudor Crown was the symbol of a" Canadian Military Chief Warrant Officer" not just RSM. King vs Queen crown. https://www.difference101.com/king-crown-vs-queen-crown-what-is-the-difference-between-king-crown-and-queen-crown/

Does anyone here in their right mind really think Trudeau has anything to do with what is on a stamp?

Nope, did not. I discussed it with another poster. I do not have to tell you, a bible thumper, anything and refuse to do so. Your morals are based on a story book so, discussing with you is fruitless. I admit nothing and your attempt at coercion is also fruitless. Do you still beat your wife or significant other or did you stop when you read your story book?? Are you still blinded by your story book? Why do you keep secrets?? Point is, there are many things that are none of your business, no matter how much you try to evangelize. I request you stop posting to me, stop responding to me. I do not want to discuss anything with you. You are a waste of my time.

Nope, I just stated it is none of your concern or business. Big difference. I made no judgment on myself, you did. Typical of a the bible thumping better than thou crowd. LOL

Have a good day.

That is personal. For sure it is none of your concern but certainly not the storybook you ascribe to.