ExFlyer

Ahh yes...more deflection instead of addressing the points LOL I applaud nothing about the federal liberals except the leader is trying to get Canada out of the back pocket of Trump. But I cannot applaude PP for anything at all. I mean, his backbenchers are leaving him or they are backstabbing him and holding meetings in the US without his approval or support. "Nope...some of us question your comments and statements and ask for proof and none of you come back with evidence of your statements and comments. So, we do not defend Federal Liberal Party, we question your comments and if there are even any sources to those comments. But hey, it seems easier to question, and accuse some here than providing any proof of those statements " LOL

Get over it an live for today and tomorrow...you and PP still are fighting Trudeau. In case you don't know...he has been gone for over a year LOL Oh and...PP whining about grocery prices and his two biggest staff members were lobbyists for Walmart an Weston...the companies he complains about the most LOL Oh yeah...he wants his cake...and he eats it too LOL So, let me think about this....believe BNN Bloomberg, a leading financial group in Canada or the wisdom of goodess?? Well goodie...you lose! LOL

" On the core issue you raised: if any politician — Conservative, Liberal, or otherwise — siphoned off a quarter of a billion taxpayer dollars into their own personal business, that would be a serious matter. Allegations like that would require strong evidence, investigations, and likely legal consequences. The standard shouldn’t change based on party affiliation. It’s completely reasonable to expect: Transparency in public spending Independent oversight Equal accountability across parties Clear distinction between fact, allegation, and opinion If you’d like, we can look at a specific case and break down: What’s alleged What’s proven What investigations found What’s opinion vs. documented fact"

Did I say it was the conservatives fault??? I only posted photos of PP's staff. Complain and lay blame yet hire lobbyists for the same organizations you complain about??? https://breachmedia.ca/pierre-poilievres-new-governing-council-stacked-with-corporate-lobbyists/ What is incorrect or false about it??

Text from your link: "Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced a partnership with Enbridge Inc (TSE: ENB) on Monday to expand pipeline capacity to the United States." "The agreement establishes a working group between Enbridge and the Alberta Petroleum Marketing Commission to streamline regulations and explore opportunities across the company’s 29,000-kilometer network" "However, past provincial guarantees have proven problematic, including a 30-year bitumen supply contract for the Sturgeon Refinery that resulted in monthly losses of $28 million by 2021." So...you missed...again

There ya go...Proves my point exactly

Exactly proves my point....lots of dissing others but never answering questions with evidence or proof. Only accusations and conjecture. More often than not...our comments include proof and evidence then the retorts only deflect

Nope...some of us question your comments and statements and ask for proof and none of you come back with evidence of your statements and comments. So, we do not defend Federal Liberal Party, we question your comments and if there are even any sources to those comments. But hey, it seems easier to question, and accuse some here than providing any proof of those statements

No...you made a comment....prove your statements "At least Alberta and BC have the sense to ignore dumb federal regulations and build an oil pipeline straight south to the States." "So I assume you dont know about the 1.4 billion put up by Enbridge?" I would like for you to back up your statements. When and where did Enbridge put up $1.4 billion fro a Alberta to BC to the USA pipeline?

Nope...not for a new pipeline.....but Enbridge has been putting money into existing pipelines for years. So, show me where they are putting new money in for a new pipeline from Alberta/BC to the USA.

OMG!!!! LOOK!!! ...A confux fan? Or maybe a confux clone? Or just another plain underappreciated degenerate imbecile like confux?

Oh...and when will that happen?....Oh, is that the week after never!!!! Neither will put up any money for that LOL LOL

Every once in a while he forgets to put on his tin foil hat LOL

And PP's rhetoric is the cost of imported carrots are the liberals fault LOL

from another source: Can we stop pretending the Prime Minister is standing at the cash register setting the price of lettuce? Canada’s grocery inflation spikes are mostly coming from import cost reality: a weaker dollar, global food shocks, climate hits, shipping, packaging, fertilizer, the stuff that raises costs before your food even lands on a shelf. Even the Bank of Canada has pointed to import cost pressures as a major driver behind the resurgence. But here’s where it gets disgusting: While Canadians are getting cooked at checkout, Galen G. Weston’s Loblaw empire is still the biggest player in the room… and certain politicians are out here acting like they’re “fighting for you” while keeping the corporate backchannels warm. Let’s talk about Pierre Poilievre’s circle. Jenni Byrne is one of Poilievre’s key political operators, and her firm, Jenni Byrne + Associates, has been registered to lobby the Ontario government on behalf of Loblaw, according to provincial lobby records. So when Poilievre, Melissa Lantsman, and the Byrne machine start doing the “we care about grocery prices” routine, ask the only question that matters: If you’re really on the side of working people… why are the people closest to you tied to the grocery giant’s lobbying ecosystem? And here’s the part the rage bait crowd hates: You can be mad at grocery bills AND be honest about the causes. It’s not “Carney controls prices.” That’s toddler level economics. But it is true that market concentration can make price drops slower and pain stickier, which is why serious policy means: more competition, fewer barriers to new entrants, and less corporate gatekeeping. So yeah, I’ll be fair: The Liberal government doesn’t control global food prices or the Canadian dollar like a thermostat. But they can keep doing the adult work: competition reform, supply chain resilience, affordability measures that actually move the needle. And to anyone still falling for Poilievre’s “I’m your grocery warrior” cosplay… If your ‘anti gouging’ hero’s inner circle is orbiting Loblaw’s lobbying world, you’re not watching a solution.

Ha HA HA ...the voters in that riding did not know what PP was to become.

Says who? You??? LOL

I stand by what I said to goodess and it goes for you too "Yup.. you certainly do not know as much as an MP does." If you two knew anything you would be able to do a lot more than only whine and drip on a forum Who is the PM? What party won the election? What are you afraid of...the Canadian citizens making up their minds and picking the right person for the job? LOL Your mantra is getting real old and worthless. It was humorous the first few times but... now it is just pointless LOL OK...you got it LOL

Yeah sure LOL Who "flipped" a riding???? An MP made a decision.

Yup.. you certainly do not know as much as an MP does.

Maybe the MP's that are crossing the floor get to see and hear what is really going on (as opposed to your conjecture and facebook rumours) and decide it is best for their constituents to move away from PP?

yet...conservative members keep crossing the floor... "Pierre Poilievre may have won the endorsement of the party rank-and-file at the Calgary convention, but the party establishment – MPs, party officials, the pros – know he’s toast." - Andrew Coyne, Globe and Mail, February 18, 2026 Some more excerpts from Coyne's article today about Conservative MP Jamil Jivani's "trade" trip to the US and Poilievre's future: In his comments on the trip, in both the Canadian media and American, Mr. Jivani instead seemed to go out of his way to paint the American side as reasonable and sympathetic (“Tell the Canadians I love them,” he reported Mr. Trump as having said), the Canadian side as unreasonable and motivated by anti-Americanism. In one infamous outburst, he dismissed Canadian objections to Mr. Trump’s unprovoked attacks on the country as a “hissy-fit.” A particular Trump administration complaint, that Canada was not being as “pragmatic” as Mexico, was echoed nearly word-for-word. Even that might have been bearable, had Mr. Jivani not dressed the whole thing up as a high-minded, country-before-party exercise in bipartisanship, to which only bitter partisans could object. It was nothing of the kind. It wasn’t even partisanship, if you mean something likely to advance the Conservative cause, as a good many Conservative MPs will tell you. So what was it, then? A bit of self-promotion, certainly, but of a particular kind. By so conspicuously aligning himself with Mr. Trump, Mr. Jivani was laying claim, I think, to the leadership of the MAGA wing of the Conservative Party. That is, I am sorry to say, a sizable chunk of the party base. Polls show somewhere between one-quarter and one-half of Conservative supporters approve of Mr. Trump, notwithstanding his threats to impoverish and annex the country. The post-Poilievre leadership race, in other words, is already under way. Pierre Poilievre may have won the endorsement of the party rank-and-file at the Calgary convention, but the party establishment – MPs, party officials, the pros – know he’s toast. The Conservatives are nine or 10 points behind the Liberals in the polls. Mr. Poilievre is 20 points or more behind Mark Carney. And the reason is Mr. Trump. Whenever the U.S. President starts bashing Canada, the Liberals go up in the polls, the Conservatives go down, and the divisions within the Conservative ranks, between the pro- and anti-Trump wings, or between those preaching defiance and those preaching appeasement, grow deeper. That is only likely to get worse, because Mr. Trump’s behaviour is only likely to get worse. Like his predecessors as party leader, Mr. Poilievre has attempted to straddle that divide. He has been more successful at it than they, but only because he has been more willing to cater to the MAGA side. Even in his speech to the convention, he could not bring himself to say Mr. Trump’s name. That has cost him support among the broader public. But it has also failed to buy more than short-term peace in the party. As things heat up between Canada and the U.S., the pressure on the Conservative Party will grow; as the cracks in the party open wider, straddling will prove increasingly uncomfortable. A house divided cannot stand. The Conservative Party will have to decide, once and for all, which side it is on. The coming leadership race will tell the tale.

And you keep on and on and on. WOW.....talk about having another hissy fit.....control yourself you degenerate pedophile LOSER LOL LOL LOL Keep em coming LOSER LOL LOL LOL If you have not figured it out yet...all you will get from me is cut and paste. So....Keep on keeping on LOL

Thing is...Carney is way ahead for who Canadians think would be the best PM. It is leadership that is the problem... Canadians may not like what is going on but they think Polievere is not the one to run this country and here we sit.