ExFlyer

My point is that policies and plans change. What specific situation are you upset about. Did the government use a neewpolicy, modify the old or just go with it? As an example, look what trudeau did with the emergency act when the truckers debacle was going on. he used it, with modifications. As I said, what Mulroney did was changed by Chretien, what Chretien did was changed by Harper. What Harper did was changed by Trudeau. The only thing guaranteed is that with change in government, change will happen. Cannot tell me that when PP becomes PM that he won't make many changes to existing policies and procedures. I do not support it. My issue with guaranteed basic income is who gets it and for how long? Is it once on you are guaranteed for life? Semi or annual reviews? Who administers it? Nationally? Provincially? Locally? The "work" problem is different in all of Canada.

Yes and? Point is, policy, like plans have to change with the situation. I am sure the next government will make changes to policy/procedures/processes and ....plans. Just like Harper did to Chretiens and Trudeau did to Harpers and will go on ad infinitum.

What memo? Written by who? What hospital? Who is BC United? A soccer team?

Dealing with that fool is farting against thunder LOL He won't hear you LOL

Oh, the one armed , one eyed, one legged paper hangar? LOL My Wife saw lots of folks with medical certification. Medical stuff is easy to get. If institutionalized, they would not need guaranteed income. Oh, it is mentally challenged that are the criminals? Everyone will claim mental illness if caught LOL

Policy is a framework. It does not and cannot be all encompassing. Situations dictate.

That is what "plans" are all about. Just in case documents. As you are surely aware, plans change, even when there is inaction. The immediate situation dictates. All governments have plans. All departments withing the government have plans. Many of those plans change for whatever government is in power. And who is to decide? How many appeals are going to be allowed? It is a very bad path to guarantee income.

I worked in the Military. We produced plans every day. We re-wrote plans the in between times. As absurd as the situations we could dream up, we made plans to act. The RCMP intelligence and planing group do the same. Any kind of imaginary scenario has a plan to combat or, control or dissolve the issue. Your link is just another scenario that has a plan and is filed in a huge planning cabinet. Having said that, most all plans need governmental approval to enact. Oh and, all plans are secret... If exposed, as this op ed does, the plan will be cancelled and a new one made

Rioting? Who? Where? When?Why?

Therein lies the real problem. Who is "legitimately unable to work"? My Wife worked in Ontario social services for over 20 years and was baffled at the "legitimately unable to work" people.... and she was able to see all records.

You are a loser in all aspects. You do not have the ability to be civil. You are unable to discuss with anyone without insult and belittlement. You display arrogance beyond description. You have no life except on this forum. You cannot accept a truce when civilly offered because your incapable of being normal. Clearly an inbred dick. Yes, you are loser is every aspect. You have wasted far too much of my and others time. Even AI is tired of calling you out. LOL By far, the biggest assface on the forums. Cannot civilly discuss anything with anyone. You can now comfortably slide back up PP's A$$ where you came from. Just a turd sliding out of PP's butt. LOL A true assface. All the photos and images I posted are exactly you. So, before the block...here are a couple to remember

It seems you enjoy engaging with me, finding amusement in our interactions. While I strive to provide helpful responses, I understand that humor and entertainment bypasses you. I will continue to respond, keeping in mind the balance between utility and my enjoyment. Thank you for sharing your foolish perspective. EDIT: I edited to offer you the olive branch which in your infinite wisdom , you broke.

OK then. I gave you a great opportunity. Oh, and I don't sit and wait for you to come up with another useless post. You should take advantage of the olive branch offered but it seems you are too much of a loser to accept it.

I think that taxes on gasoline have always been more than 35% For sure, carbon taxes have added but, gas has been a huge tax grab for thr provinces and the feds forever. https://torontosun.com/news/provincial/a-breakdown-of-where-the-money-goes-when-gas-prices-soar

Do you really want to keep being shamed like this?? If so, you are proving my point. EDIT: I am willing and pleased to call a truce. Just stay away with your demeaning, belittlement, insults and rhetoric..

I searched also and could not find any climate plan by PP. I could find lots of talk about his "no plan" and how what he has said is BS. https://www.thespec.com/opinion/contributors/poilievre-s-burn-baby-burn-climate-plan-is-emboldening-oil-lobby/article_51ef1000-34eb-530f-b8b0-08e0d45e4208.html

They have a plan, not exactly right after he was elected leader though. The document does state we will also have a carbon tax but caps it at $50 per ton. ...no rebates ($170 per ton for industry). And the rest of the plan are just talking points and no action points. A lot about what we should do but barely nothing about what he will do. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/marilyngladu/pages/65/attachments/original/1618503903/CPC-EnvironmentPolicy-EN-WEB-FINAL.pdf?1618503903 I am not disagreeing with anything you say about the liberal mismanagement.

Sorry, I missed your deadline. This one took overnight because I went to bed and forgot about you LOL Yeah, sometimes it take a little longer, my two finger typing skills deteriorate when having to constantly respond to your 1diocy Sometimes I just have to play the role of a fool to fool the fool who thinks they are fooling you LOL

So, you say conspiracies happen every day and then you say because someone claims it may be one they are "dumb ass left wing liberal buffoons"? and "go into your typical left wing liberal ballistic mode"? All claims of conspiracies are made by "dumb ass left wing liberal buffoons"? Are you a bit confused and seem to be stumbling over your own tongue (or keyboard) LOL In this specific case, passing off 2 and 3 year old news clips and trying to make it relative is a conspiracy theory. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy theory I guess if you have a point and want to be valid, prove it in todays perspective. Old news has had time to fester and if there was validity, it would have changed a lot of things but in this specific case, it was noted 2 and 3 years ago and died a natural death. Bringing it up again is only an attempt to make something of it or, a conspiracy theory that there was something being hidden.

Another 2 second spent on cdnfux

I create nothing,. There are lots of pictures on the net, specially to out guys like you LOL Keep em coming puppy... I got nothing but time on my hands to make fools like you look even stoopider

In 2 and 3 year old stories. This is not new news, it has been out there for years. And it was probably exposed even before that. Some guys just gotta dig up old news to perpetuate their conspiracy theories LOL My opinion...as valid as theirs.