ExFlyer

C'mon, even you have to wonder how in a little over a year one person can put up 17,800 posts on a forum? What does this person do besides stir shit on the forum. How can one person spend so much time on a forum? No life elsewhere?

More Blah Blah Blah LOL Shit comes from you...out of every port LOL 17.8K posts in a bit over a year...we all know your basement dwelling seclusion and this forum is all you have LOL What a F'n loser...lives on a forum.

Blah Blah Blah... and the shit keeps leaking out of every orifice on your body

Soap up and blather on LOL You for sure ain't no expert and ...you are always wrong LOL confux world...all fuxed up

More and more blather Still can't grasp the difference between hypothesis and fact and theory....yup Duhhhh LOL A world according to canfx would be pretty fu*cked up LOL Your stupidity is leaking out LOL

More blather.

No, I do not confuse support documents and factual proof. Any yes, they are not the same. All I am saying and have said, there is no proof. Two very different things. Do not try to wash it away. There is no similarity to civil court or any court unless you invoke unanimous agreement...in which case conjecture, theories or hypothesis is neither. There are proven facts and then there are conjectures, hypothesis and theories... very different things, especially in science. Been a pleasure and when there is or you have conclusive proof, I will fully agree and please, lets discuss again. Have a good day.

I get it exactly. The key part of the definition is "an idea or theory that is not proven " My point has been, form the beginning, provide some proof. I did say it was an educated guess, bit not proven I have more than a clue. I just, as I said, wait for the proof. I am not arguing or demeaning or calling you names, I am just saying that conjecture is not final. Remember that Canada has some culpability in this stuff https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/winnipeg-lab-firing-documents-released-china-1.7128865

Nope, Just have come to the realization that you are a F'n loser and full of BS. Not a single post of yours is of any value except to fulfill your need to insult and demean. Do you have to call upstairs to Mommy to make you the popcorn? LOL

Look, I am truly hoping that you understand what a"hypothesis" is? While it may be educated, it is still just a guess, a theory that needs to be proven.I s it "beyond reasonable doubt"? No but, it is still unproven so, it is not fact. Absolutely, if we get a final answer it will count but, until the "hypothesis " is proven, it is still just a theory.

Boo Hoo, whining and crying because you lost again...hey whadaya expect from King loser? Ya got nuthin but whine. LOL Gibberish from the loser....again

Look, the topic is an editorial (or guest essay as the paper calls it) by someone that theorizes and has a "hypothesis". It is all conjecture with no evidence for accuracy. As soon as anything COVIS +D is brought up, a half dozen covid conspiracy theorists (like you) show up and try to make what she wrote about some sort of factual scientific document. It was and is not. It is hypothesis. It is a serious question but there are no facts. Making something or a lot out of someones theory is foolish and demeans your credibility. So , your last sentence, "Will we ever know for certain? Anybody's guess." is very accurate... At this time, it is a guess.

The one and only liar on these forums is you. Face it, you are a loser of monumental proportions. Facts and quotes are provided to you and you twist them to suit your lying narrative. You are a complete liar and loser, all in one package

Bullshit. Again, you have shown nothing, A theory, a hypothesis....like you regularly produce. Worth nothing without proof....real proof, not your conspiracy proof LOL I ain't smarter, i just accept real proof, not BS from a blowhard like you LOL As for being smarter, I truly hope you don't think you are smarter than the average kindergartner? They make shit up all the time too LOL

And therein lies the fact that the topic headline is just someones opinion and imagination and also has no proof of their hypothesis.

WTF??? You ran out of meds again??? What is that diatribe supposed to be about??

You have shown shit all. Only thing shown is reinforce your conspiracy club presidency LOL Her are the exact words again "Her guest essay in Sunday’s Times, titled “Why the Pandemic Probably Started in a Lab, in 5 Key Points,” takes readers through the so-called lab leak hypothesis" Hypothesis: "A hypothesis is an assumption, an idea that is proposed for the sake of argument so that it can be tested to see if it might be true. In the scientific method, the hypothesis is constructed before any applicable research has been done, apart from a basic background review." If she had proof, it would be a scientific paper, not a guest essay LOL Essay "An essay is, generally, a piece of writing that gives the author's own argument, but the definition is vague, overlapping with those of a letter, a paper, ..." So,you are defending an imagination making it a conspiracy , as you always do. Yup, you are just confirming you are a F'n loser again LOL

And, as I said, some Canadian funding from the Winnipeg labs where they dismissed and ejected 2 Chinese scientists.

F'n loser president speaks some more.....BS LOL Hey, say what you want, the topic is about some persons editorial and it is self admitted hypothesis.....like your diatribe.... no poof,

Chuckle. The Vice President , or is it the President of the repolitics conspiracy theory club speaks....far too much LOL Yeah but none of them have positive proof. LOL Only hypothesis LOL "Unless you can prove otherwise that is the most likely case." all theory and hypothesis, no proof. Lots of BS but no evidence to prove their theory. LOL My theory is that you are an a$$ but...it is only a hypothesis LOL Keep going Pres LOL

or a "Hypothesis"? LOL https://www.livescience.com/34052-unsolved-mysteries-physics.html or https://www.livescience.com/34052-unsolved-mysteries-physics.html or https://www.famousscientists.org/10-most-famous-scientific-theories-that-were-later-debunked/ Point is, theories or hypothesis are not fact.

Key is "theory" There are lots of unproven theories out there. I can make some up and so can you. Here are some https://science.howstuffworks.com/dictionary/12-of-the-most-mind-blowing-scientific-theories-ever-conceived.htm Here are some more https://www.livescience.com/11375-top-ten-conspiracy-theories.html

And the saga with conspirators goes on ...and on....and on LOL Here it is again, from the link, from the editorial .. "HYPOTHISIS. THEORY". "Wuhan was not capable of containing an airborne virus " Someones rectal pluck and you folks suck it up as fact LOL

It is you that does not understand the point Here it is again "HYPOTHISIS. THEORY". "Wuhan was not capable of containing an airborne virus " I do not imply anything. These are direct quotes from the story. No facts, that is the point

Hey, I am not a conspirator so, I read what is written when it is, right from the beginning a hypothesis and then admitted theory. There is nothing to believe. It is an opinion, like so many conspirators are jumping on. So, my opinion, whether you like it or not is that the editorial is just conjecture. Not a debatable issue with me just as the 1.8 K topic about covid is also just a half dozen conspirators stroking each other ad infinitum. LOL