ExFlyer

Ha HA HA!! Cannot get over being called out as dumb or dumber LOL Don't have to look hard to find "custom little pictures" depicting you. LOL Don't worry I won't charge you rent...It is so much fun watching you squirm LOL Here is a warning sign for all your posts LOL

3 terms and we throw them out... LOL

Oh look, dumb or dumber is back again LOL Do you honestly think people don't' see this as projection? Your insults have become so lame, so petty, so dumb. Rent free in your head ....

Nope. You are clearly a Dork. A Loser and others are catching on. Oh and you are begging for more ...again? Such a loser committing suicide by begging for more...LOL I am looking good...you, on te other hand by posting stupid foolishness are the one not looking so good LOL But hey, if you want more, there is a lt more. The meltdown is happening in your head, where I have been living rent free LOL Oh and your retorts are ones I have used on you....you cannot even be original anymore. What a F'n loser

Yeah....you lose...again LOL

Hey Dork, when you are wrong, you are wrong.... as you are most of the time lately. LOL

Dork !! LOL Elected in 2008. Became leader in 2013. Voted as PM in 2015. Frack, you cannot even Google for answers LOL A loser Dork LOL

Dude, you said he was a"rookie". 8 years in a job is far from being a rookie. He had 2 years as a leader (and got his security clearance to know what is going on) but, he sat for 5 years previous to that. 2 years as a leader was enough to kick Harpers ass LOL You do not have to be in cabinet to observe what is going on LOL Was he incompetent. No, he had a better plan and platform than Harper but, he did become less and less effective after 3 terms as PM. Hence he will pay for that. Bottom line confux, he was not a rookie and will leave with lots of experience as a leader...more than PP that does not even have clearance to get to know what is going on LOL. So, as a key loser, your arguments and claims are useless.

The point is he was not a rookie. He had 5 years as a sitting member. He then spent 2 years as leader of the opposition and then ousted the sitting prime minister. When, as an opposition MP, he was the critic for youth, citizenship, and immigration. Your claim that he was a rookie is just being foolish, as you so often are. You said "That makes him a rookie kiddo. He never held a cabinet seat, he was never in gov't when it was in power, he'd never done anything other than be an opposition mp and he hadn't done that for very long. " and yet, after 8 years as a "rookie", he became PM. He could not hold a cabinet position as his party was not in power untill he beat Harper and held the ultimate cabinet position. So, suck it up ya loser, 8 years in parliament does not make anyone a "rookie"

OK Michael. Goodbye on this topic.

1.Michael, it is you that does not understand. You are not willing to believe that it ts the users that use and post and determine content on social platforms. 2. Before meta is not worth discussing because that was before the Canadian ruling. They just choose not to succumb to a law punishing them for what you do or say. Are you somehow implying that Meta be a source for Canadian news??/ They don''t do that, they just regurgitate what you post. I cannot understand how you can even come to the conclusion that "US corporation prioritize mass communication in our nation is anti nationalist."??? They do not do anything about tor with he news, you do, you post and link and spread it, not them. They are just the platform. It is like saying the paper producer is responsible for what you write on it LOL 3. As for the US banning TikTok, even the US realizes they cannot do that.

Hes spent 5 years as a sitting MP. He was elected in 2008 and then selected as leader in 2013 and then became prime minister in 2015. He was no rookie when he became leader or the PM.

The amount of money the government has spent and is still spending for renting hotel rooms and suits is flabbergasting. The scary thing is if they start to becoming hotel owners and operators there will be another horrendous bureaucracy.

The article is just whining that meta is not paying but more importantly, that it does not allow Canadian news.. That and , Google has since the article ,succumbed.... but is the only one,

Michael, I think you over estimate algorithms. If you think facebook algorithm censors posts you are wrong. "The Facebook algorithm is a set of ranking signals powered by machine learning and artificial intelligence. It calculates which content is most likely to appeal to each user and then delivers them a personalized feed." Also you disregard the fact facebook does not allow links from Canada period. And do not believe the X policy I posted. There is not talk of instagram, whatapp, tiktok etc which are also social media platforms. It seems you and others are upset with facebook only LOL Oh and Google is not social media, "Google LLC is an American multinational corporation and technology company focusing on online advertising, search engine technology, cloud computing, computer software, quantum computing, e-commerce, consumer electronics, and artificial intelligence."

You see Michael, by your statement that facebook and twitter decides what news you see is where you are off the rails. I linked you to X policy and facebook just will not allow links, Facebook and twitter are user platforms and they do not b=make or show the news unless the users, you and me, post it. Facebook and twitter do not generate or distribute news, they are just the platform for what users do.

1. So, of the 8 federal by elections and only 1 lost are protest votes? 2. Please name the failed politicians that are chiefs of staff.

"It's important to know that X does not screen content or remove potentially offensive content. As a policy, we do not mediate content or intervene in disputes between users. However, targeted abuse or harassment may constitute a violation of the X Rules and Terms of Service." https://help.x.com/en/safety-and-security/offensive-posts-and-content Michael, as you can tell, I am very passionate about this subject. That the government coerced/forced/taxed/ordered social media to pay for our Canadian monopolistic media. That someone else has to subsidize our poor media product and performance. That our government allowed our news media to become a monopoly.

Or were hangars on when in school and then party helpers then assistants, then secretaries, then party hacks then MP/MLA etc. No real work except for the party. A la PP? LOL

1. No matter what you call it, it is government imposed payment on Google. As i recall, Google was the only one that succumbed. 2. Certainly can be but, it fits into the OP's complaint. 3. I disagree completely. No discriminating algorithms for social media. X is censored??? Truth Social is vetted?? I think not LOL Especially forums...as this forum is a perfect example of unfettered posting.. There are "rules", some of which may be enforced if posters complain and if admins want to do anything. Facebook does have "rules".

I see Google kowtowing to government wishes. They did not have to and I wished they did not. The link only describes what Google is doing. I think they are wrong. All that happens now is the media can get more complacent with poor product because Google is going to give them money on top of what the government already gives them. I disagree with the US seeing media decline. Geez, small towns that I visit have better local news than I do in the nations capital LOL Take a city like Buffalo 5+ newspapers (some weekly) not including the national papers like WSJ, USA Today etc. 4 networks with lots of local news (CBS has 2 hours in the morning and 2 hours in the evening) and it is not even 1/2 the size of Ottawa, the nations capital. My point is that social media, facebook, twitter (X), all forums , reddit, Quora etc are a platform and controlled basically by the users and yet our government insists the platforms pay for what the users do or say. Why is X not paying??? Even the news media advertise and have accounts in X, not even notong that every reporter has an X account?

Yes. My comment was "I love the US system that only allows presidents to stay for 2 terms. That should be a mandate in Canada too. " I went on to stay "This should go for all politicians." So, your objection is???

1. some of it. 2. I do understand and see the "protection measures" but I am also in favour of if you do a good job",you will stay in business. 3. Well, file sharing is the issue....with the government isn't it. They wan tto tax social media for sharing files so, social media says no. Going back to #2. I am fortunate enough to have travelled and travel a lot in North America and Europe. We here in Canada have allowed our media to be monopolized by a few companies so when you say the media gets the money, only what, 3 or 4 companies get subsidized? In my town, we have 2 newspapers, btoh owned by the same company. The headlines are different but the story content is identical. 2 TV networks CBC and CTV and the radio is owned by CTV. My evening news is 15 minutes local and the rest belched out of Toronto. I watch the first 15 minutes then the local weather (which has had the same low tech weather map for 15 years) then watch reruns of Star Trek LOL Same goes for my local newspapers. The media, TV, radio and print in the US, even small towns is doing fine as it is in Europe. How come in Canada it cannot survive? I suggest to you that the product is so inferior and not worth watching. The media is dying why? Because social media has been the provider of information to the public. Why? because the media sucks and we insist on subsidizing it. no reason for it to get better because we tax anything that may be better. So, I am on the side of facebook. for not paying to subsidize media that they do not even deal with.

100% against politicians for life. I love the US system that only allows presidents to stay for 2 terms. That should be a mandate in Canada too. This should go for all politicians. 8 to 10 years and you are out. After 2 terms they become entrenched and entitled and forget who they work for.

He may even have to suck up to the NDP??? Now that would be a funny turn of events LOL