West

Another false narrative that spawned out of this is that 25% of women at colleges are sexually assaulted. Surely we can all start to see the pattern among the left wing

The left, particularly Barry, used this case to push changes to Title IX which basically mandates universities to develop a policy that allows for frivolous allegations such as this one. Keeps Abuse Inc happy with all these "consultants" and lawyers. They are trying to do the same now with false narratives in the churches. Very vile and disgusting human beings

So now you are doubling down on stupidity. I'll ask you again. Do you have evidence that Carlson, an anchor from a major news outlet, was not being truthful in that clip, or are you going to admit you've got nothing?

Correct.. based on reporting from a major news outlet.

OK so you have no proof about your assertion that a news host was lying. You lose.

Do you have evidence that Carlson was being untruthful?

Oh now you are getting picky on the "proof" you'll accept. Sorry not playing that game.

"But the people who are now being picked up and some of them have been jailed without trial for months, even years on end, did not commit violence. They walked through open doors, they were escorted by police, they felt that this was okay. And I think Jacob Chansley is a classic example of that." https://www.foxnews.com/media/tucker-carlson-releases-exclusive-jan-6-footage-says-politicians-media-lied-about-sicknick-qanon-shaman.amp

The fact that most trials were in 2024 proves my point.

There are plenty of examples. Anywhere from prison time to house arrest for misdemeanor charges for doing similar things as the fbi informants. You can look those up yourself. The Supreme Court even slapped down all the overcharging nonsense that was going on. You can check the SC dockets for that Yet you are going to sit here and defend the FBI, the DOJ and everything else? Most of this shit is going to get overturned within the next 6 months to a year anyway, cases will be dropped and pardons will be issued. You'll maybe be left with a few dozen legit cases but the majority of the spin from the organization that you are trying to defend has been bullshit and you ought be ashamed of yourself. Most of the trials themselves were held off until this past summer. Election cycle with your vegetable of a president trying to hype it up. Do the math bud.

You are seriously not with it, bud and irrational. I've followed this for the past three years and now you are going to tell me not to believe my eyes? Seriously your defending the indefensible. At some point you gotta put your big boy pants on and call out inhumane treatment of people. Anyway, this is clearly going nowhere and your purpose is to belittle. It's pathetic

Proven wrong yet you still persist. "More than a hundred cases are still awaiting trial."

You are clearly ignorant of the facts. Here's one example from 2023 where six Minnesotians were imprisoned and no trial date had been set in over two years https://www.kare11.com/article/news/local/breaking-the-news/6-minnesotans-are-still-awaiting-trial-on-2nd-anniversary-of-jan-6th-capitol-riot/89-20147e5e-9a5e-49b4-8df3-abc25f07f35b As an aside, in the US many innocent people plead guilty so they don't lose their shirts in legal expenses. And spare me the bullshit that it's not happening.

Glad to see I'm not the only one they are doing the red herring thing to

And my point is these folks are sitting in a prison cell, some for 3 or 4 years without any sort of trial date set, for the equivalent of a trespassing charge while the folks at the FBI continue to fuel the narrative set by politicians, the press, and pay informants for basically doing the same thing.

Many people who are arrested and sitting in prison right now didn't engage in any violence but are still being dubbed as insurrectionists or in your case a violent mob.

This isn't true at all.

I never claimed there wasn't unknowns.

Sure. Based on the information at hand, 1. The FBI is paying informants 2. The informants are apparently breaking federal law. 3. This raises questions about the ethics of tax payers dollars going toward paying for such a thing 4. To me, it seems like the feds are in some way, whether directly or indirectly, contributing to this particular event 5. The extent to which that is, their coordination, etc still requires clarification, but 6. I would say that based on the information presented there is questionable methods and ethics that would support those who are raising the questions and alarms of the "fedsurrection" and to pass it off as a "conspiracy theory" is bogus. Just my two cents.

Well you are welcome to offer your input into the discussion if you choose but it's a little silly to be attacking the OP because you don't like the question, no? Welcome to forums where people will disagree with you

Yeah it is. You got hung up on lingo for about two pages The report specifies that paid FBI informants were entering the Capitol without authorization. Tell me why my conclusion is wrong for the sake of moving the conversation forward.

The tax payers have a right to know whether or not their tax dollars are being abused and spent on spinning narratives, or circumventing applicable civil liberties through paying third party "informants" to do the dirty work of the FBI that they likely WOULD NOT be able to do based on applicable legislation otherwise

I've already told you what I think. What's retarded is YOU getting hung up on whether or not somebody is using the lingo that you want them to use.

You are saying that I claimed it was a fedsurrection. In the English written language, (?) Signals a question. Do you understand what a (?) Is?

Oh shut up. Your question is loaded and retarded. That's why