Nationalist

1.2. Pedos??? Ya know...that never even occurred to me. I just figured this is one more thing that some people need to be reminded of...leave the sex ed till the kids are developed enough to deal with the subject. Pedos? Really? I'm not sure I believe that... 3. OK...so in your opinion, its retarded to make a law that the vast majority of folks agree on...especially parents of little kids...that makes sure the schools are not subjecting their little kids to sexual behaviour lessons? That's rather warped. Especially when we consider that the state government actually thought this is necessary. Thus there must have been some pretty raw examples of this stupidity already going on. Any person who figures such teaching at that age is...a good thing...frankly needs a slap and then be fired on the spot. There's an old saying...perhaps you've heard it. It goes..."Lead, Follow, or get outta the way." I cannot sit idly by and watch stupid extremists play games with our kids and their natural development. Nor can I sit idly by and watch people make erroneous shit up about a law that should never have had to be made in the first place. Only a demented person would teach sexual anything to a child.

1. 2. HOW? And further to that...if we all agree that little children need not be exposed to sexual behaviour lessons, then children should not be exposed to sexual behaviour lessons. For instance, most societies have laws banning thievery. Why? Because we all agree that thievery is unwanted in our society. I do not understand what the objection to this simple concept is. Now, were some people to say things like, "Thieves are thieves and have rights as thieves. We need to teach our young'uns to be accepting of thieves and their thievery." do you figure that would go over well? 3. I didn't ask you to pick between the 2...I asked you "who the hell is fomenting a 'culture war'?" You know...the one you brought up?

I often laugh to myself...mostly because crying would be messy...about people who think they know enough about a foreign society to pass judgments on them. So if I may...let's find REALITY...shall we? @CITIZEN_2015 Neither you nor I know jack-shit about Iranian society. We are shown images of Mullahs and fed some slogans but...we know jack...jack. Do I think Iran is a nice place for women? I don't know...and neither do you. Hell I wouldn't be at all surprised to find out Iranian women are quite happy...thank you very much...as they have a population of real men who are unafraid to be "men", instead of this limp dish of goo our strange society encourages our men to be. You and this @User47 person have been going at it for pages and what have you discovered? Well...he appears to know more about our society than we do of his...hers...or whatever... And in the end, what has our ignorance and lack of information gotten us? An enemy that's aligning itself with our other enemies...China and Russia. Now...I'm sure a lot of your argument here has to do with the ever so nonsensical skree..."We do what's morally right." Yet again...BY WHO'S STANDARDS??? What makes you think YOUR morality is something the Iranian people have any interest in? What right do you have to try to impose this nonsense on people on the other side of the planet and a society that predates ours by...what...a 1000 years at least? If I were you @CITIZEN_2015...I'd be more concerned with the Zionists and their "glass parkinglot" policy, than I am about Iran and their soccer team.

OK...how would you say the bill is "framed to foment a 'culture war'"? As I understand it, the bill simply says don't teach sexual behaviour of any sort, to little kids. As far as I'm concerned, that's something adults should not have to be told, yet evidently...they do. So the wild-eyed Libbies go off the deep end and call it the "Don't say gay" bill. Now I ask you...in all honesty...who the hell is fomenting a 'culture war'? The reaction to this was as silly as it was transparent. My question to these Disney freaks is, 'Why do you want to teach sexual behaviour to little kids?'

TDS...Trump Derangement Syndrome. Frankly...I don't think you know politics well at all. You seem to think the conservative side is nothing more than a bunch of white supremacist liars. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are white supremacist in the conservative camp...and there are black supremacists in the liberal camp. And in the end...acknowledging the small numbers of each extremist group...as long as the extremists don't take control of either side...who cares? You need to try REALITY.

TDS...Trump Derangement Syndrome. Its bad and I'm afraid...you got it. I asked you to show or exemplify the "deceptions" Trump employed...you can't answer with anything more than..."deceptive language". Yet can you site any of this "deceptive language"? Not as yet. Can you explain the great Russia Russia Russia campaign? How about Schiff's constant lies about said non-issue? Or Pelosi and her Ukrainian phone call BS? Or the seething lie that the January 6th riot was some sort of "insurrection"? There are a few "truths" about messaging. One of the main ones is that everything you hear about products, be they a coffee maker or a politician, the message will be crafted to accentuate the positive and ignore the negative. Hence the saying, "Buyer beware". Catholic schools are not a problem and they are certainly not predominantly protected. The public school system consistently tries to do away with them and private schools. Try living in REALITY. Its not easy but, the challenge is what makes it satisfying.

I'm sorry but this Soros character needs to be capped between the eyes and unceremoniously dumped in a ditch.

Son...you have issues. That bill simply forbids sexual content from being taught to little kids. Disney caved to a "clan" of screaming young freaks who somehow figure kids should be taught about sexual behavior. You assume some nefarious intent where there is none. Nobody cares if a person is straight or gay. Hell one of my boys is gay. And if that's his thing...good...be happy son. Just promise to adopt a few kids because...mom and I want grandchildren... I think your TDS is driving you to make silly conclusions. BTW...my gay son...is conservative.

So...if I read this correctly...you figure conservatives live by deception? That a "nationalist" is nothing more than a racist? If this is what you think... I'm afraid you've shown your TDS affliction. Tell me...what deception do you figure Trump employed? Was it the work his administration did to improve conditions for black Americans? For Latinos or even women? Those denominations faired pretty well under Trump. So which clan might we be talkin' 'bout here? TDS is a strange condition. I've never understood it. But it appears to have driven you to make some pretty wild assumptions.

It tells me they're idiots. They let their fear of condemnation cut off data and opinions from the other side. They could have cashed in on a much larger audience and thus profit from encouraging information from all people who wanted to participate. Panty-wastes.

Mooo... LOL

@Michael Hardner We discussed the differences between FOX News and CNN a few days ago. I said I'd watch both, and have. This thread...I hope...will be a discussion and a search...of sorts...for real truth. Cold facts to issues and events. Participate or don't... I watched CNN fairly regularly through the 90's and 2000's. I worked for a Canadian embassy in Europe in the 90's and either CNN or CBC ran constantly in the offices. I remember first seeing Tucker Carlson on CNN...in a bow tie. In 1996 FOX News came into being. It was brash and obviously biased toward the Republican party and conservatism. A lot o' water under the bridge since then. CBC meant only 1 thing to me for my entire life...Hockey Night In Canada. They blew that and I found no more use for them. But FOX and CNN...lately. Over the last couple weeks I've seen CNN play the Russian Harp primarily. Endless interviews with Ukrainian mothers who speak English...pictures of reported Russian bombing and atrocities...the last few days, lots of Elon Musk and Twitter. Oddly enough, little to nothing about Hunter and his fabled laptop. On FOX I see lots of the Russian Harp as well. But I also get a small whiff of Russian propaganda as well. Statements from Russian notaries and such. An interesting view point. I see a lot of Hunter's fabled laptop and talk of Joe's possible...if not obvious...participation and profiting. They still hammer on the border pretty hard daily and report on urban violence quite a bit. All in all, I find FOX present a more diverse selection of subjects than does CNN. I also find the CNN personalities use terms like "potentially", "could be", and likes to play the obligatory race card regularly. They flat out deny the very existence of CRT and fell for the whole "Don't say gay" horseshit. On the other side of the fence...Hannity is not enamoured with Joe Biden what so ever...and its bloody obvious. His disdain for Biden is as intense as Don leMon's hatred of Trump. My analysis leads me to conclude that FOX News provides a superior product, if only because of the wider array of issues they report on and discuss. I have to admit as well that, while both of these MSM news channels have obvious biases, CNN tends to lie a little too much and a little too often for my liking. So...what about the "alternative" news sources? I sometimes watch Czech news with my wife. Pretty interesting opinions over seas people. How do you view the MSM news? Do you believe anything any of them say? How do you get you news fix and what sources really "nail it"?

I've had the same doctor for 30 some-odd years. He and I are the same age and we both like to golf. His office is generally not busy (2 or 3 patients waiting) and he's a good doctor. My boys see him too. However our socialized medical system is full of holes. As I understand it, in Ontario the hospitals are given increasingly smaller budgets to operate from. Nurses are now part-time workers and general staffing has been cut all over to save capital. Yet we spent how much on The Rona? We spend money foolishly. Bike lanes comes to mind. We also did damage to our small business base. Dumb. Hospitals, Police and Ambulatory services need to have their budgets vastly increased. Nurses should be FULL-TIME and there should be more of them, there needs to be more doctors on staff at all times, A cop should be on very beat and visible, when an ambulance and/or fire fighter is needed, they should be there. We sacrifice so much of the budgets on dumb-ass crap, that increasing these vital services should be easy. All it takes...someone who isn't interested in corporate or lobbyist desires.

Agreed. The bots should be redone to simply crawl through posts for people breaking the law. Death threats and that sort of nonsense.

OK... 1. "The First Amendment’s Free Speech Clause affords special protection to certain places traditionally open for speech activities, such as sidewalks and public ways, placing a heavy burden on any government attempt to restrict speech in what the Court has identified as “traditional public fora.” But even in a public forum, the government may impose reasonable restrictions on the time, place, or manner of protected speech—so-called time-place-manner restrictions—provided those restrictions are justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech, that they are narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest, and that they leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information." - https://www.law.cornell.edu/supreme_court_of_the_united_states_2013–2014_term_in_review/first_amendment_freedom_of_speech The question becomes, 'Have Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc...cut any number of US citizens, from access to a forum in which to express their opinions? Also...have they instituted restrictions on free speech, with complete justification without reference to the content of the regulated speech? Have they "funnelled" their platforms to "tailor" them to serve a political interest? In all cases, the answer to these questions supply an obvious venue for indictment of Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc...on 1st Amendment grounds. 2. Every business person will, if they are doing their job, take advantage of cost cutting. It is the government's responsibility to regulate the advantage such that the advantage is clearly a benefit to it's citizenry. 3. I'm saying that "The World's News Source" is now the world's news media joke. I'm also saying that CNN has engaged in self-inflicted wounds with their willingness to lie consistently. That FOX News is one of the few main stream media sources which presents an America First policy instead of the all to common Liberal First policy. Hence...FOX News is thriving. I'm not sure about Switzerland but Sweden and Finland are engaged again with NATO. Perhaps the Russians have them a tad concerned? Biden, Macron, Johnson and Putin are respected by some. Trump, LePen, and I'm sure there's some Brit and Russian who are respected by some. What's your point? 5. And I would expect nothing less from you. But the jig is up. There's enough hard evidense now to clearly show these vaunted institutions are...working at cross purposes to the general well being of the population. In essence...they've GROSSLY overplayed their power and must be 'cut off at the knees' before they sell out the last remnants of what it is to be Canadian...or American. The Libbies started this "culture war". And I'm sorry but...I am not in the habit of running from a fight...and I do not like to lose.

What a fine bunch of dopes. NATO - Guilty of breaking its agreement with Russia concerning NATO expansion. Russia - Guilty of attacking Ukraine. Ukraine - Guilty of ethnic cleansing in parts of its own nation. USA - Lead by a moron. EU - Using NatGas from Russia to heat its homes and drive its "green" power generation. Lesson: When we the people allow self-centred, greed driven idiots to lead us...we gits wut we paid fer. Trump was right. There is really no escaping it now. An alliance with Russia would have been the geo-political coup of the century.

Which is exactly why we need a national leader with a backbone. If Quebec wants to separate or segregate itself from the rest of Canada, fine. Here's the rules: 1. You will require your own currency. 2. You will require your own military. 3. You will NOT have autonomy over the St. Lawrence Seaway. 4. You will NOT receive any funding from Canada. Loans...perhaps. Handouts...certainly not. 5. You will deal with your own Native Relations. 6. Your population will require passports to leave Quebec. 7. We will grant the current population of Quebec a 1 year allowance to relocate to Canada. After that, your population will require a Visa to travel and will traverse proper channels for migration. 8. The Ottawa River is Canadian. 9. Trade between Quebec and Canada will be encouraged with a comfortable tariff system in place. 10. Canada will bypass Quebec with pipelines to our Maritime provinces. Have a nice day and enjoy... Oh and...please rename The Montreal Canadians? "Habs" seems appropriate...

Interesting. Principled. Ok.

A question for all of you: If India attacked China in order to save the Uigher people, would you condemn the Indians?

I like Quebec. It gives Canada a unique flavour...if you will. I like the native people too...for the same reason. However I am not a fan of multi-culturalism. It's fine for people to hang on to their cultural roots, but first and foremost, they must be CANADIAN! Thus I think there should be only a Canadian flag in every classroom and the national anthem should be played every morning in schools. Our schools should focus on the beauty of Canada. The accomplishments of Canadians. The value of our abundant wide open spaces and natural resources.

Hi Scotty. Yup...it's me. Your non-religious fellow free-speech advocate. Teaching pre-teen kids about sexual behavior is a bad idea. Teaching them about abnormal sexual behavior is even worse. But not because of some religious reasons, as you elude to here, but because they're kids. You know...young people who are still trying to learn basic academic skills as well as basic social skills. But on the positive side...you got to say "pedophiles".

Well gee whiz Scotty...this might even make sense...were I religious. That's right son...i belong to no man's religion. Not Christian, Jew nor Muslim. Not even Budhism. But do keep trying son. Hell your first half-sentence was on the mark. Swing...an' a miss...

As I'd thought. Nothin'.

Cute. Your father?

What feels great is the prospect free speech being reintroduced to the internet. This sick utopian dream of globalist crap is crumbling. CNN is a fading and CNN+ is a 300 million dollar failure. Europe is being torn apart by the edicts of the EU. Here in Canada our PM is an international joke. I am enjoying watching Libbies squirm and whine. To me the icing on top would be to see Trump win a second term in 2024 an Pixie-Dust utterly destroyed. Logical come-upins...was always inescapable.