Jump to content

suds

Member
  • Posts

    844
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by suds

  1. I doubt we will never know exactly what they want until we acknowledge the idea that we have to give up something. And don't bullshit me about country and sovereignty. I love and would defend my country, but our politicians are mostly a bunch of self serving, party first, bastards.
  2. Ok Spanky, just answer my simple question. What do you want.... trade-off which would guarantee no new tariffs or trade war?
  3. Just out of interest, why do you say that? Over the years I've listened to Lee countless times on the radio and enjoyed every minute of it. There's nothing political about him either. And there are more than a few experts who agree with him that a trade war with the U.S. does nobody any good especially us. And I agree with Doug that our politicians are using this emergency to only further their political goals. And if you don't agree with their madness then you're a traitor.
  4. Aren't all banks either foreign or domestic regulated by Canadian regulators? And what about dairy products and other foodstuffs? Are they not regulated to a certain extent to meet Canadian standards? When one considers a 25% tariff on all Canadian exports which makes the more sense? A trade-off or a trade war?
  5. Right. We're blessed with resources and live next door to the world's #1 economic powerhouse and leader of the free world. We should be thanking our lucky stars. But no, let's reject the U.S. and look for greener pastures elsewhere because Trump's a mean person or whatever other stupid reason you can think of. Get your head out of your ass.
  6. Plain stupid. According to Professor Ian Lee of Carleton University, the main trade irritants that the U.S. has with Canada are well documented in the USTR (United States Trade Representative) reports. Every country the U.S. trades with has it's own report and 'irritants'. Protectionist policies of 'supply management' Telecom Act which shuts out U.S. telecom providers Banking Act with its protectionist measures to shut out U.S. banks The airline industry and its protectionist measures And most recently digital taxes that discriminate against U.S. digital giants According to Lee, Trump and his economic advisors see tariffs as a tool to leverage other countries into opening up their markets to U.S. firms. What our politicians should be doing is sitting down with the Americans, opening up our free trade agreement and be prepared to put all our sacred cows on the table, in return for guarantees of no tariffs. 'To fight American protectionism is to get rid of our own protectionism'.
  7. According to Yahoo, Biden issued a 'blanket pardon' to pretty much the rest of his family minutes before the Trump inauguration.
  8. Yeah ok. If everyone lived their life that way the world would probably be a whole lot better place. Can't argue with you.
  9. It certainly does close all the loopholes. But what happens when people break laws or infringe on the rights of others? Does the state not have the right to use coercion then? You'd better maybe tidy that up a bit. And don't forget about the First Amendment as Fox has pointed out.
  10. Rome wasn't built in a day either. And in the 1860's a million people died in civil war to set others free. Up to that point in time I doubt the world had ever witnessed anything quite like it. When the Declaration was written it was more of an inspiration to the type of country they wanted to create. And the present day Constitution reflects a lot of that.
  11. Sorry to say this, but someone came up with something a little better... We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
  12. Actually it's a good time for Danielle Smith to go and state her (and Alberta's) case, because anyone worth knowing (politically) is going to be there. She will likely find common ground with more than a few U.S. politicians. If she did nothing it would be a dereliction of her duties as Premier. Of course there are always a few maroons amongst us who think otherwise.
  13. There would be more than a few obstacles to overcome. But if the EU could do it with the number of members it has, why couldn't Canada and the U.S.? It's worth looking into. Of course under the terms of any agreement some sovereignty would have to be given up.
  14. Nothing surprises me anymore. Once you've built up a resistance to the constant insanity you become immune to it.
  15. Can anyone explain what a theoretical multicultural post national state is supposed to look like? I also personally don't like the term 'nationalist'. If one loves or believes in their country I would consider them to be a patriot. It's far less confusing.
  16. Nothing makes much sense to me either. Unless they're purposely withholding evidence for whatever reason, there's very little to go on. Knowing what we know, I'd say there's little grounds for extradition.
  17. I agree. It's time to smooth things over. There's an old saying about cutting off one's nose to spite one's face.
  18. O'Leary has backed down somewhat over Canada being part of the US. Now he's preaching 'economic union' (with open borders naturally) and I would presume with even the possibility of sharing a common currency. I'd say joining the US is out of the question, but the prospect of an economic union is certainly worth taking a close look at.
  19. So Trump will order the US military to invade Canada and then likely order them to engage in genocide to complete the objective in securing our resources? And we should be preparing our military for combat to defend our sovereignty and democracy? Yeah right. A better plan might be for the US, Canada, and Denmark, to sit down and come to some agreement on how to keep the contested parts of the Arctic out of Russian and/or Chinese control.
  20. from the op.... Poilievre has stated he would make cuts to “corporate welfare.” (Corporate welfare refers to government financial assistance, subsidies, tax breaks, or other favorable policies provided to private businesses including multi-national companies, or to specific industries.) If I was the CBC, I'd be planning for and expecting that a few cuts were in the works for them as well.
  21. That's not really what he's saying is it? I can't see Poilievre firing a government official for simply disagreeing with him. On the other hand, a government official who disagrees but also insists on imposing their beliefs on subordinates regardless of official government policy.... is totally different. Do you also have a problem with de-funding those that have anti-semitic agendas? Or Islamophobic, or racist or ....
  22. It took her long enough to stand up to our own childish narcissistic bully. Better late than never I suppose. At one time I thought she would have made a great PM, but that time has passed in my opinion. What the Liberal Party needs now is some new fresh blood.
  23. If it makes economic sense he will.
  24. Reducing the budget of every government department by 10% would be a good place to start. However, meeting our 2% commitment to Nato might help us avoid the 25% tariff.
×
×
  • Create New...