A more deserved name for the "fake news" media may well be the "arbitrary news" media. A more deserved slogan for "all the news that's fit to print" may well be "all the news that's fit to print (but are reluctant to print due to the negative affects on our political interests and market share)". Which pretty much sums up cnn, msnbc, and the NYT. The big difference between fox and its rivals is that fox openly admits its bias in its reporting and commentary, while it would be like pulling teeth in getting others (or their viewers/listeners) to admit to any such thing. THEY are the phonies who pass themselves off as "real news". What's killing the US today is the political polarization of its citizens, the two political parties, as well as the mainstream news sources. Whereas at one time when voters would look at party policy with a reasonably sound mind they now fall blindly into lockstep with whatever the party or their favoured media giant says. As for "real news" (if there was such a thing), I would think that without commentary or opinion it would be terribly boring. Not a good way to jack up market share or increase advertising revenue.