Aristides

Like men need a right to abortion. It just demonstrates your contempt for women.

That's really pretty ignorant.

Whatever.

FFS. No one says I'm going to become an addict just so I can have a miscarriage .

That's intentionally poisoning a child. There is definitely malice involved. Again, WTF are you talking about?

WTF are you talking about?

Yet you know that won't happen. If an addict has a miscarriage there is no malice involved, she is an addict. If an alcoholic has a miscarriage, there is no malice involved, she is an addict. What is it you don't understand about addiction?

Equal under the law to be charged with manslaughter if their actions caused a woman to have a miscarriage.

My question is, at what point would you consider them equal? Stop dancing.

That is vehicular homicide. Still dancing. If there is a fender bender (no crime involved) and a woman has a miscarriage. If she is at fault, she should be charged with manslaughter. If the man is at fault, shouldn't he as well? It's a simple question, why can't you answer it?

What kind of answer is that? According to you, If the woman has a miscarriage he should be charged with manslaughter .

If a guy hits a car driven by a women and she has a miscarriage, he will not be charged with manslaughter and you know it. You want rules for women that don't apply to you.

Trumpsters give conservatives a bad name. They have formed a cult and called themselves conservatives.

The Russians just hit a mall with rockets today. They have been intentionally bombing civilian targets for months.

GDP never increased by more than 3% since the turn of this century, even during Trump's term. Except for 2004/5 https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-gdp-growth-3306008

So she gets in a fender bender or falls off a bicycle. Guilty of manslaughter. You aren't pro life, you are pro punishment. Especially since it could never happen to you regardless of how careless or bad behaved you are. Women's got to be punished.

Ah Fox. That explains it. Still living in your one dimensional world. https://www.quora.com/When-was-America-most-prosperous?share=1 https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/08/60-years-of-american-economic-history-told-in-1-graph/261503/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_economic_expansions_in_the_United_States

She sure as hell was, you don't get charged with manslaughter for taking drugs. Next thing you know a women will be charged with manslaughter if she has a miscarriage due to a vehicle accident where she was at fault or any other misadventure. You are the one being dishonest.

One was the New York Post. One was the BBC. One was the Business Insider It doesn't matter what is linked that goes against your narrative and ignorance, you will just blow it off.

That's too logical for these guys.

21st century and there are still men who think god gave them the right to rule women. I guess that's what you call an originalist.

I asked you a question but you won't answer it. I'll ask you one more time. What restrictions would satisfy you short of an complete ban? Why should anyone have to walk away?

You are the one who admires them. You support packing a court on ideological basis, you support the attack on elections. You support a man like Trump who does all of those things. You are the one who would go along with the Nazi rise to power with your blind faith in your dear leader.

That isn't what states are doing. Who cares what teams pray for before games as long as individual players aren't forced into it.

Actually it does if you bothered to read it. But of course you didn't. I'll ask you the same question, other than an outright ban, what restrictions would you be comfortable with?