Jump to content

BeaverFever

Senior Member
  • Posts

    7,485
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    35

Everything posted by BeaverFever

  1. Ahh...poor Fiddle. You put so much work into that all week I'm almost sorry I have to pop your bubble. But I do. Claim: Five Wisconsin cities received money for the 2020 election from Mark Zuckerberg, which amounted to "a wave of massive election bribery." Courts have repeatedly upheld grants Gableman says amount to 'massive election bribery' IF YOUR TIME IS SHORT The grant money went to more than 200 cities in Wisconsin, including many Republican ones, not just the five heavily Democratic ones mentioned. What’s more, multiple lawsuits challenging the grants were filed, none of which were successful. In one case, a U.S. District judge appointed by President George W. Bush refused to block the grant money. An appeals court later held that those who brought the lawsuit failed to identify any laws that would prohibit the grants. See the sources for this fact-check Michael Gableman, the former state Supreme Court justice overseeing a Republican-ordered, taxpayer-funded review of Wisconsin’s long-settled 2020 election, has made many factually-challenged statements... https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/mar/15/michael-gableman/courts-have-repeatedly-upheld-grants-gableman-says/ POLITICS Wisconsin judge calls some arguments “close to preposterous” over election grants funded from Facebook’s Zuckerberg https://www.wizmnews.com/2022/05/18/wisconsin-judge-calls-some-arguments-close-to-preposterous-over-election-grants-funded-from-facebooks-zuckerberg/amp/
  2. Omg you are dense The Biden campaign did not an and hold rallies to begin with because they knew that would be highly irresponsible….what aren’t you understanding?
  3. So that’s why all charges against Breonnas boyfriend were dropped and Breonnas family received a $12M payout and the cop who killed her was fired and no evidence of criminal activity was found in her home? Because she was a criminal? You make it sound like Breonna had a dead body in her trunk. Four years before she was killed by police, Breonna had rented a car for her then-boyfriend to use, and a friend of his was shot and killed while driving the car. Breonna wasn’t named as a suspect then or now because the cops knew that she wasn’t involved in the killing. And the cops BLATANTLY LIED on the search warrant saying the US Mail confirmed suspicious packages had been delivered to her when in fact they had told police the exact opposite. THERE WERE NO PACKAGES AT HER HOME YOU ARE GROSSLY MISINFORMED AGAIN The MSM didn’t “gobble up” Smollets story his fake claims were extensively reported on once there was reason to believe they were fake I’ve still never heard of this Sandman person or the incident your talking about. Must be local news some random small time incident that tue right wing media is trying to blow out of proportion HILLARY CLINTON CONSPIRACYYYYYY AAAAH! He didn’t provide “false information to the FBI about Alfa bank”. He presented real data internet dats indicative of communication between Alfa computer servers and Trump Co computer servers, the FBI found to be inconclusive evidence of any criminal wrongdoing although they could not explain the “unusual activity”. That’s not a crime, genius. If you call the cops because you hear screaming at your neighbour’s house and the cops check it and everyone is fine, that’s not a crime that you reported it.
  4. FFS. Its not “selective prosecution” where one is perfectly and explicitly legal, dumbass And literally everyone with money does it for both Democrats and Republicans. I think it’s hilarious that you ignore all the Republicans who also make large donations theorou SuperPacs amd who in fact invented it and fought in the courts to make it legal. You single out only the one guy who donated to democrats. That’s “selective prosecution” in the kangaroo court that is your brain. Dsouza was not a misdemeanour it was a felony. He was convicted of a felony. Stop lying As for proof here’s the ver first hit on Google The Republican megadonor funding the party’s 2022 hopes The GOP donor was the biggest contributor to Republicans' biggest super PACs in 2021. CHICAGO — The single biggest spender in Republican politics pumped more than $28 million into the GOP in 2021 — and he’s expected to multiply that number leading into the midterms. Ken Griffin, the founder and CEO of the hedge fund Citadel, was the largest individual donor last year to the GOP super PACs aiming to flip control of Congress, contributing $11 million to the Congressional Leadership Fund and $5 million to Senate Leadership Fund. He splashed another $5 million apiece into Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis’ PAC and into Honor Pennsylvania, a super PAC backing fellow hedge funder Dave McCormick — and opposing celebrity physician Mehmet Oz — in Pennsylvania’s GOP Senate primary, making Griffin the biggest individual donor to those two groups so far. https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2022/02/03/ken-griffin-donor-midterm-cash-00005052 And from 2020: Sheldon Adelson’s super PAC spending spree shaped GOP politics Adelson, who died Monday, combined with his wife to donate more to Republicans than multiple other megadonors combined. The Adelsons made $218 million in federal donations in 2019 and 2020 — over three times more than the next-biggest GOP donors, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. They accounted for more than one-quarter of all Republican outside spending on President Donald Trump’s behalf in this election: $90 million out of $353 million in total, per CRP. And over the last five years, the Adelsons gave $280 million to House and Senate Republicans’ main super PACs, supplying more than one-third of the funding for Congressional Leadership Fund and nearly one-quarter of Senate Leadership Fund’s total during that time, according to a POLITICO review of FEC data. Their total federal giving over the last decade topped a half-billion dollars. https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2021/01/12/adelson-super-pac-gop-458380 Did you read that last part? Half a BILLION DOLLARS, @Infidel Dog And finally here are the top 20 political donors from 2020, as you can see its overwhelmingly Republican donors. And, the top 2 Democrats (who were the biggest donors overall) are people who ran for president themselves and were simply donating to their own campaigns, not buying politicians (Bloomberg and Steyer) https://www.forbes.com/sites/michelatindera/2021/02/25/these-billionaire-donors-spent-the-most-money-on-the-2020-election/?sh=4a72e14a14ce
  5. Hilarious. No they don’t. Like you they respond to any inconvenient facts with bogus claims of “fake news” and “conspiracy” while spewing false facts and BS
  6. Breonna Taylor and her boyfriend were law-abiding citizens and the police who lied on their search warrant didn’t identify themselves when they entered the home in masks. That’s a fact. Nobody said smollett was a victim and I’ve never heard of your sandman nonsense. Hillary’s lawyer was acquitted and as a result the John Durham witch hunt collapsed. Keep living your conspiracy fever dream that’s only believed by your small minority group, while the rest of us who live in reality laugh and pass you by.
  7. You don’t get it. For then ones that sid have cameras why don’t we see the “mules” making more than 1 drop? They must have because in order for their claim of 400,000 fake ballots to add up they must have made multiple drops at each location. The footage doesn’t show anyone putting in a large amount of ballots with, just 1 or 2. There’s one clip where a woman puts an envelope in and the film claims there are “3 or 4” envelopes but there’s no way you can tell that from the film it’s just a white rectangle that could just as likely be only 1 envelope. But even if these “mules” are dropping “3 or 4” at a time it wouldn’t add up. Then there’s the woman who tossed her gloves the garbage and the film hilariously claims that since she got her gloves in on the first try she must be a “mule” that’s taken many practice shots on that garbage can after each drop. They said she went to that same box “dozens” of times. But the camera on that box only shows her that one time. This film a a scam to suck money from the already converted
  8. Anti-abortionists are only successful at murdering someone every 4 years. Do you want a medal or something?
  9. Contrary to your conspiracy theories the BLM protests weren’t planned and organized by the Biden campaign
  10. You’re the one who believes in a vast conspiracy theory so by definition that makes you the kool-aid drinker.
  11. Dinesh was a criminal Zuckerberg wasn’t. End if story Hilarious that you want to single out Zuckerberg for doing exactly what Republicans created and do themselves And the line of billionaires funnel money to Trump and the GOP in the same way Zuckerberg did is miles longer. For every Zuckerberg there are countless billionaires funelling money to Trump, Republican SuperPACs and darkmoney campaigns like the Coch brothers, Adelstiens, Uhliens, Mercers, etc. and then you have all the scams like the “stop the steal” funds that raise donations from gullible working class suckers claiming the money is for overturning the 2020 election when in reality it’s just going in the billionaires pockets. And lets not forget all the Republicans sent to jail for election fraud and election finance scams, Dinesh wasn’t an outlier he’s par for the course and part of a ling Republican tradition that goes back decades
  12. You just keep serving up more bullshit. Your only way of “proving” your right wing propaganda is to link to other right wing propaganda. You’re not able to source any non-partisan sources. That’s like “proving” a koran verse is true by quoting another koran verse.
  13. These publicity-seeking propagandists make their living by desperately shilling for YouTube likes and views that make them money. They would love nothing more than to have actual real-life Very Important Person grant them legitimacy with face to face meeting. And as I said before you can’t have a legitimate debate with someone who has no respect foe the truth or the basic principles of legitimate debate
  14. And correction: the convicted felon intentionally donated $20,000 over the limit (the limit was the original $10,000 he donated for himself and his cheated-on wife) and he also fraudulently represented that the $20,000 in illegal contributions came from 4 other people.
  15. They’re not releasing the names of the alleged NGOs or the supposed “mules” because they’re full of shit and after seeing Syney Powell and friends get their asses sued off by all the people they falsely accused , they learned that making false allegations against real people has real consequences. So we’re going to hear all kinds of excuses why they can’t officially name names as part of some secret strategy or whatever and they’ll never come out y it’s a fake group that never existed or a real group thats since closed its doors and so can’t sue. Although I’m sure just to string the gullible followers along and milk them for more money, Dinesh and friends will falsely name specific people and groups through fake and untraceable Social media accounts. Dinesh and friends will then publicly say “I can neither neither confirm nor deny these internet “revelations” (wink wink) but you should DEFINITELY believe EVERYTHING you read on social media (wink wink), especially the people being accused by this mysterious and anonymous Twitter user who is totally not me names @iamdefinitelynotdineshdsouzawinkwinkpleasedontsueme….I bet that guy is really smart and handsome….uh…whoever he is (wink wink)”
  16. One of their geofences (as shown in the film anyway) was wrong and we now know “visit” mean travel within 30 feet at any speed and they probably did a half-ass job at filtering according to those rules. Also delivery drivers, uber drivers etc and many regular people carry multiple devices so they’re overcounting. Still this movie is trying to use cellphone data to prove democrats are meeting with space aliens without providing any evidence of space aliens action existing, or evidence that the cellphone owners are Democrats. This is a movie for people who already blindly believe Dems are meeting with space aliens and just want to memorize a few details of what route they took.
  17. But even with cameras filming the same box why does the mule footage only appear once? They accuse the woman with gloves and mask of hitting the same box “dozens of times” according to her phone data yet for her everyone else the camera only shows them there once? If some nefarious conspirator went in to delete mule footage from the archives why didn’t he delete all their footage instead of leaving footage of exactly one drop for each of them?
  18. One of them (Dinesh) made a conscious decision to be a criminal and break the law and the other (Zuckerberg) chose to obey the law. That’s the difference that matters here. Zuckerberg obeyed the law and everything he sod was perfectly legal. It doesn’t mean I thinks its a fine law or that massive donations should be legal, but its the law Republicans especially fought for.
  19. Sounds lie @WestCanMan has fallen so far down his conspiracy hole he thinks his crackpot minority opinion is actually held by the majority of people.
  20. Only true for the same reason it would be impossible to have a legitimate debate with Charles Manson or Osama bin Laden. Which is to say that it is impossible to have a legitimate debate with shameless liars, gaslighters and conspiracy kooks who are not grounded by honesty, integrity or reality such as Charlie Kirk, Dinsesh D'Souza or Ben Shapiro.
  21. Your “laundry list” is just bunch of your bullshit beliefs where you’ve simply decided you amd conservative propaganda are right and all other views are wrong. Its not a list where the Dems/MSM have been “proven” to be lying or wrong
  22. That’s a lie. Dinesh the convicted felon and wife-cheater used his mistress and his employee as straw donors to funnel $20,000 in illegal campaign contributions under their names and both of their spouses names Thats in addition to the $10k he donated on behalf of himself and his cheated-on wife. Then when the candidate asked him about it he lied to her. Dinesh admitted in court he knowingly and purposely broke the law. Americas political system of legalized bribery is a crowing achievement of Republicans who successfully brought many USSC cases that claimed corporations have the same rights as people and cash donations are free speech therefore corporate donations must not be limited. Everything Zuckerberg did is perfectly legal in the US which is why he’s a free man. Meanwhile the long list of convicted Republican campaign finance crooks shows they can’t even meet the very low bar of the US, which allows all sorts of shady money schemes that are blatantly illegal in most developed countries.
  23. The “explainers” that are supposed to fill the gaps in the missing evidence are missing evidence of their own. 4 million minutes of footage snd not one one shows the same person making more than drop. The Excuse is another unproven zero evidence conspiracy that people tampered with the cameras to delete only the extra drops but not the initial drops. You know how much time that would take 2,000 mules times an average of 38 drops that means find all 76,000 clips of “mule” camera footage and edit out at least 74,000 of those clips so they only appear once without leaving any evidence. And of course nobody to corroborate their claims that cameras were nonfunctional etc Also no footage of anyone dropping off more than a few ballots at a time, mostly only 1 ballot yet they claim almost 400,000 were dropped off ridiculous A geolocation ping cannot differentiate between someone speeding by and someone stopped FULL STOP
  24. Yep I know how they play the game. And if you don’t respond to them they claim your silence is admission that they’re right. Under. the Bush Jr administration they learned that all you have to do is keep putting out lies: old debunked lies, new lies, nonsensical lies it doesn’t matter just keep lying because their supporters don’t make judgements based on factuality or logic. But just like their 911 lies and their WMD lies and their Kenyan birth certificate lies, eventually they have to give up on them because it costs them a lot of time and money to keep putting lies out there while the truth is always free and readily available. And now none of these righties will even admit to having believed the old ones. Eventually they have to redirect their resources to spread the next big lie and the old lies die and they pretend that their beliefs were bipartisan. A few years from now they’ll be claiming that everyone including Republicans and Democrats believed in the Big Lie which is exactly what they say now about all those other past lies: “everyone thought Saddam had WMD and was behind 911, everyone thought Obama was Kenyan!” So for posterity I think wherever their lies are we have to confront them even knowing they pathetically resort to something else the next day.
×
×
  • Create New...