BeaverFever

Holy crap you are the dullest person on this forum for sure. You don’t even know what whataboutery is do you? First I never said there had never been a single Muslim ever who advocated for Sharia nor did I say it would be Islamophobic to suggest there had. Second this thread is not about Sharia it’s about a fake news campaign run against Canadians by the Israeli government The only person you continually prove to be an idi1ot is yourself BWAAAAAHAAHAAAHAAA!!!!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂 Is that supposed to he joke? Is this Opposite Day? What next are you going to call me a conservative Trump supporter? Not only do I not subscribe to ANY conspiracy theories but conspiracy theories are what YOU are famous for, you election-denying anti-vax kook! Seriously where do you get your crazy sh1t from? LOL You have no concept of fairness in your shriveled dropout brain that stopped developing when you were a teenager You think you’re “reel smart” when you don’t realize that you’re the dimmest guy in the room This goes beyond simple propaganda. Propaganda is what politicians say to the camera. This is a covert fake news campaign targeting Canadians with deceitful manipulated reality like the kind mounted by Russia and China. You only think it’s ok because you are on the side of the people who are doing it Like a true brown shirt thug you have no morals, you only have “sides” Are you facking Stupid? Of course Hamas is. Hamas is a terrorist organization. Are you admitting that the government of Israel is no better than a terrorist group? Your arguments are so facking dull you should be embarrassed but I guess having no shame goes hand in hand with having no morals

Who is “them”? All Muslims in Canada? Everyone opposed to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza?

It’s not comparable to other western countries in this regard.

Putting all you whatboutery, straw men and ad-hominems aside, what matters is that the Israeli government deep faked a fake news story complete with AI-altered audio and video and covert social media campaign with fake user engagement in order to influence the opinions of Canadians I am not surprised that this anti-democratic thuggery doesn’t bother you there’s no dirty deed too dirty for you, all that matters to you is WHO is doing the deed and WHO is getting hirt by it. You have no actual morals, youve made that clear, you’re a digital Brown Shirt of the 21st century

Israel denies link to Islamophobic campaign in Canada | CP24.com OTTAWA -- The Israeli government is being accused in published reports of involvement in an operation aimed at reducing support for Palestinians in Canada that was flagged by artificial intelligence researchers. Israel rejects the claim, being reported by the New York Times and Israeli newspaper Haaretz, that it's behind the social-media influence campaign, in which researchers say North Americans are being targeted with Islamophobic content. Accounts bearing the name United Citizens for Canada posted content portraying Canadian Muslims as threatening Western values, and suggesting pro-Palestinian protesters in Canada were seeking to implement Shariah law. The Digital Forensic Research Lab, a project run by the Atlantic Council, a prominent Washington think tank, first called out the posts in a March analysis. It noted that the campaign employed artificial intelligence to change words being said by a man with a beard and Muslim skullcap at a rally. It also noted a photo of Muslims holding a banner was digitally altered, making the poster read "Shariah for Canada." "The network, which included at least 50 accounts on Facebook, 18 on Instagram and more than one hundred on X, boosted anti-Muslim and Islamophobic narratives directed at Canadian audiences," the March analysis reads. The accounts used AI-generated profile pictures and repeatedly posted similar messages, often seeking to garner press coverage directly from individual Canadian journalists and media outlets. One post on Instagram warns people to be wary "if anti-Liberal Islam wants to enter your hockey team." The group "possibly hijacked existing accounts," the think tank wrote. Meta said it decided to close down affiliated Facebook profiles after receiving queries from the think tank. In its quarterly "adversarial threat report" released last month, Meta confirmed it closed down more than 500 accounts linked to the campaign. "This network originated in Israel and primarily targeted audiences in the United States and Canada," the report reads, with Meta saying accounts were "posing as Jewish students, African Americans and 'concerned' citizens" and involved "creating fictitious news outlets." "The campaign purchased inauthentic engagement (i.e. likes and followers) from Vietnam in an attempt to make its content appear more popular than it was," Meta's report reads. "While the individuals behind it attempted to conceal their identity and co-ordination, we found links to STOIC, a political marketing and business intelligence firm based in Tel Aviv, Israel. It is now banned from our platform." The Israeli investigative site Fake Reporter reported Wednesday that the site targeting Canadians is hosted on the same IP address that has started numerous other accounts targeting pro-Palestinian activists, such as amplifying concerns about on-campus protests. The New York Times and Haaretz said in reports Wednesday that STOIC's work was contracted for and paid for by the Israeli government. The Canadian Press has not independently verified the claims. The company declined comment to both media outlets, and could not be reached by The Canadian Press. The company's LinkedIn page was recently taken down and its website lists no contact information. Both outlets site sources and documents that they report show that Israel's Ministry of Diaspora Affairs paid for the campaign, including the Islamophobic postings. … https://www.cp24.com/mobile/news/israel-denies-link-to-islamophobic-campaign-in-canada-that-meta-says-originated-there-1.6915078?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.ca%2F

Also notice how the cartoon in the OP doesn’t portray Russia…just Ukraine boiling in some undescribed “crisis”. LMAO The only villain in the cartoon is the US. Just another Russian troll farm operation.

It’s always a red flag when a newbie shows up and within minutes of creating their account is creating new threads with long diatribes that support the Russian agenda. His long post was posted 6 minutes after his account was created, that seems a little fast given its length. Probably a pre-written copy-paste you can find on other forums.

$100 million of that came from a single ultra-rich ultra-Republican billionaire mega donor who is so wealthy they could buy and sell boogeyman George Soros several times over: Miriam Adelson, the wife of the recently deceased Las Vegas Casino tycoon Sheldon Adelson. While Jewish like Soros, the Adelsons somehow don’t have Soros’s forest fire-making Jewish space lasers that MTG was once on about (I know, she said space based magnifying glasses, not “lasers”…but when you’re as batshit as that, those kinds of distinctions don’t really matter)

She didn’t conspire to donate tens of thousands under other people’s names like D’Souza did. And the total amount of excess over-contributions in her case was just $5.400 to five different candidates COMBINED ….out of the 50 candidates to whom she donated. Big difference.

*sigh* are you seriously that dense? Do you not know what the word evidence means? If Democrat said they had video footage of Trump turning into a bat and sucking people’s blood and on top of that nobody is allowed to see the video….would you consider that he has “evidence” that Trump is a vampire? You only would if it was Biden, right? If I told people you’re a pedophile and I have video evidence but nobody is allowed to see it so they’ll just take my word for it, would you consider that “evidence” too? So to recap for you dense skill for the hundredth time CLAIMING to have damning videos, names and addresses that you refuse to let anyone else see or verify is NOT EVIDENCE CLAIMING to have proven your accusations through secret methods that you refuse to even describe to anyone is NOT EVIDENCE CLAIMING that technology works in ways that everyone with knowledge of the technology says it doesn’t is NOT EVIDENCE The accusations in 2000 mules are made up and the supposed “evidence” he CLAIMS to exist but doesn’t let anyone examine is also made up and defies basic logic. If 2000 mules was word-for-word the exact same movie but alleging Republican ballot stuffing instead you people would not believe a word of it and you would be saying the exact thing I am saying now. That just goes to show how your rabid partisanship has hijacked your brain False. I already pointed out the words “no evidence” and “debunked” appear in the titles. Nome of the articles say there was evidence to support his claims they debunk what he claimed to be evidence as not being evidence. This has been pointed put to you many times now, you are purposely being obtuse and have resorted to simply repeating yourself. Of course it’s relevant his crime directly relates to the subject of his so-called movie and his motives. Again your hijacked brain doesn’t allow you to see obvious facts and conclusions. OMG you sound like Westcanman. I say it’s absolutely false because it is. You have chosen to live in an alternate reality where things are true simply because you want them to be convenient to your political ideology and you can’t be dissuaded by facts or reason. No, that’s what YOU see because you’re a slave to your political ideology. No rational person sees that OMFG. HOW F-ING THICK ARE YOU? HE HAS NOT SHOWN ANY DATA! HE ONLY CLAIMS TO HAVE DATA WHAT DO NOT UNDERSTAND???? The entire 2000 mules is just a web of unproven claims. Claiming that the proof for your accusations is secret and nobody is allowed to see it is just another unproven claim, can you seriously not understand that??? Simply saying you have evidence doesn’t mean there actually IS evidence The whole film and all the supposed “evidence” is just one big collection of “just take my word for it” I have not lied or exaggerated about anything, the only ad-hominem is you calling me a liar. You have completely misrepresented what the links I provided say and you admit you are absolutely ignorant on the details of the subject. I don’t think you’re a liar I think you believe every word you say but you’re so consumed with your identity politics you will honestly believe a grain of sand is a mountain and a mountain is a grain of sand and that a bullet wound is a scratch and a scratch is bullet wound when doing so fits your political narrative. You see things that aren’t there and you make claims without evidence In this whole argument you haven’t presented a single piece of evidence of your own….for example you’ve falsely claimed repeatedly that my sources say he presented evidence but you can’t provide one quote from my sources that back that up. You haven’t even listed what you think the actual evidence is. Your insistence that having been convicted of committing election fraud for Republicans is irrelevant to a video attempting to challenge the election results in favour of Republicans is also absurd. No reasonable person would agree with you. You also absurdly claim “there any many reasons” why he wouldn’t allow anyone to see his evidence even 2 years later but when asked to provide even one you refused to because there aren’t any.

Thats what Republicans already do

That is absolutely false. I clearly demonstrated the HE has no evidence for uis claims. Are you seriously claiming that I need to present evidence that he didn’t present evidence for his accusation ? You don’t understand how burden of proof works I clearly articulated how his arguments and claims are false and provided links. For example he claims he has footage of “mules” stuffing ballot boxes and dropping votes in boxes more than once but for 2 years hasn’t shown it, so you absurdly claim that I am the one who needs to present evidence he doesn’t actually have this footage otherwise we must assume his no-evidence claim is true??? Same for the addresses of the so-called Democrat “stash houses”, the names of the Democrat groups supposedly linked to them or any proof of their existence. I could go on and repeat myself for the third time but there’s no point No I think you’re just being a troll because you’re not this dense I think you don’t even know what ad hominem means Another absolute lie on your part. LOL no it is not the definition! Being convicted of felony election fraud for Republican candidates is directly relevant to his attempt to discredit the 2020 election for a Republican candidate….the one who pardoned him no less. What are you suddenly soft on convicted criminals now too? How do you not understand that being exposed as a fraud destroys your ability to credibly speak on the same subject where you committed your fraud? That’s absolutely false! One of them even says it has “gaping holes” right in the title! You didn’t read's cites. Trump’s AG Bill Barr’s criticism was then only one that pulled punches because he’s also a Republican and he was testifying before Congress, but I included it just to show you that even HE doesn’t buy it. He has also called Trump’s stolen election claims “bullshit” Absolutely false! The sources say the things he claims to be evidence aren’t really evidence at all. One headline has the words “debunked” and two have the words “no evidence” right there in the title. Another uses the words “gaping holes” and they don’t mean it in the way you’re hoping. 😝 Again CLAIMING you have video footage of someone visiting a drop box multiple times but only showing them visiting one time is NO evidence, it’s not half the evidence. Claiming cellphones can be geolocated within 18 inches when NO expert agrees that is possible is NO evidence. And that is exactly what the links I posted say. NOWHERE DO ANY OF THE ARTICLES SAY IT IS PLAUSIBLE You clearly skimmed the articles with your MAGA dementia lenses on and saw what you wanted to see False. The sources I posted systematically dismantle his claims and clearly state that what D’Souza claimed to be “evidence” was nothing of the sort. As I said, the sources say the things he claims to be evidence aren’t actually evidence at all. One headline has the words “debunked” and two have the words “no evidence” right there in the title. Another uses the words “gaping holes”. Seriously you can’t possibly be this deranged. You admit that you don’t even know anything about what is claimed in 2000 mules and you shamelessly completely misrepresent the criticism of him that totally dismantled his claims, in an effort to suggest the jury is still out or that he has most but not all of the evidence You know sometimes you come off as one of the more reasonable conservatives on here but sometimes you are in an alternate reality.

I guess time will tell whether it’s a quarter billion as Doug claims, or a billion but given that this same promise could be done for at least a quarter billion LESS a year from now, as at least the Beer Store subsidies wouldn’t be necessary, is this money well spent?

Doug Ford attacked over possible $1 billion price tag for liberalized booze sales Ford is defending his decision to spend hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayers’ money to liberalize alcohol sales a little more than a year earlier than scheduled. While Ford maintains it will cost $225 million to end the ”master framework agreement” this fall with The Beer Store, owned by Labatt, Molson and Sleeman, critics argue the tab could ultimately be three or four times higher. That’s due to an additional $375 million in rebates to The Beer Store as well as foregone tax revenue and a 10 per cent discount for the retailers that will buy products from the LCBO, which could cost the provincial liquor monopoly $150 million a year. ..NDP Leader Marit Stiles said “people are shaking their heads at this terrible deal” at a time when more than 2.3 million Ontarians can’t find a family doctor. “A billion dollars to get out of a deal that was going to expire in a year? Something doesn’t smell right about this. We know it, the people of Ontario know it. We’re not going to stop fighting to find out more,” said Stiles. …Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie said all Ontarians should be paying attention to Ford’s booze gambit since they are footing the bill. “Let’s be very clear what’s happening here ... taxpayers’ money is being used to expedite a deal one year,” said Crombie, adding Ford is “using your money whether you believe the numbers are $225 million (and) I think they’re closer to $1 billion ... it’s your money.” https://www.thestar.com/politics/provincial/terrible-deal-doug-ford-attacked-over-possible-1-billion-price-tag-for-liberalized-booze-sales/article_90b481e4-21bf-11ef-a6f2-6f0733e31613.html?utm_source=newsshowcase&utm_medium=gnews&utm_campaign=CDAQxIyh2P3knqIoGIGd2K_igcqguAEqDggAKgYICjDptXgw98kM&utm_content=rundown&gaa_at=g&gaa_n=ARTJ-U-KmA6vmS50aaWVstVBHSfSSrRgGy2j1rsVhyGyCGgQNMqxW8k2tBjCrPjCZtu0Tn0WTBcwRg%3D%3D&gaa_ts=665e82cf&gaa_sig=52-vRsALYKhbyA9yNqGCj09tMiwUx5IZQ_e56Z8fsUBRk4oIwE3C27fvlRNqi8FD4qLPdIvbBlKgKiHIedxgqA%3D%3D

Pfft Republicans have a truckload of activist billionaire mega donors who are richer, than boogie man George Soros and at least as powerful and politically active . Donald Trump himself is now reportedly richer than Soros, thanks to fleecing gullible suckers like you Donald Trump is now richer than George Soros — and on track to overtake Mark Cuban https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-wealth-tmtg-dwac-billionaires-stock-court-judgment-rich-list-2024-3?amp American billionaires’ political spending overwhelmingly leans Republican https://qz.com/american-billionaires-political-spending-overwhelmingl-1849751449 Beyond George Soros, Republican mega-donors represent 7 of top 10 individuals pouring into $17B midterms https://www.foxnews.com/politics/beyond-george-soros-republican-mega-donors-represent-7-top-10-individuals-pouring-17b-midterms.amp The Ultra-Rich Are Ultra-Conservative https://jacobin.com/2019/07/billionaires-and-stealth-politics The billionaires rallying behind Trump after his conviction https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckvvlv3lewxo.amp 6 GOP megadonors quietly propelling Republicans through Trump-era turbulence https://www.salon.com/2023/05/04/peter-thiel-top-megadonors-2024/

No I spelled out in detail the flaws/ errors in his argument. But like all conservatives in this forum when you hear something that’s inconvenient to your ideology you just make a blanket statement that it’s somehow not relevant. That is entirely false and none of it is wrong D’Souza is a convicted felon having previously convicted of election fraud, which is completely relevant to a “documentary” he’s made to discredit the 2020 election and demanding that we take him at his word. He is absolutely and in no uncertain terms arguing what I said he’s arguing the flaws in his claims and logic are so wide you can drive a truck between them and I described in detail what those flaws are. Ironically you’re not even able to describe how any of MY arguments are inadequate. Again typical for a conservative on this forum: you complain that detailed and specific criticism was detailed and sepecif enough, while refusing to provide ANY details or specifics yourself. But of course shameless hypocrisy has become the Republican brand. It’s not ad-hominem to state the fact that this man RECENTLY went to jail for trying to undermine free and fair elections considering this conversation is about his attempt to under the 2020 election. which statement is that? LMAO clearly you don’t understand how evidence works You are the only DERP here if you think anyone is supposed to believe his grandiose and outrageous claims and overturn the election based on secret evidence he has but won’t show anyone, even 2 years later And you admit you don’t even know if he’s provided any evidence or not but you don’t seem to even care. What would a legitimate reason be? Again more of your hypocrisy that when the accusations come from a Republican, even a convicted felon who pleaded guilty to election fraud NO EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED to believe his claims, you tak him at his word. But yet when the accusations are against any Republican suddenly your criteria for evidence is an impossibly high standard that nobody could ever realistically meet. That’s a lie it was a factual critique that you don’t want to accept so you pretend it was as you wish it was. RECAP OF FACTS: he hasn’t shown how he can locate a phone that close despite industry experts disputing his claim, he hasn’t shown how he ruled out the device of people who routinely pass by boxes located near where they live and work particularly since drop boxes are deliberately located in high traffic areas like malls and libraries, he hasn’t provided the addresses of supposed Democrat “safe houses” or even described how he knows the locations to be such, he hasn’t shown footage of anyone stuffing a box or visiting a box lore than once despite claiming 2 years ago that he has it And fact: claiming to have secret evidence that you refuse to show anyone means that for all intents and purposes you have NO evidence. Otherwise that kind of defeats the whole point of evidence in the first place. If I call the cops and say I have secret evidence that you’re a criminal but I refuse to show them or anyone, should they or anyone else believe me and come arrest you? I don’t think the technology has been invented that could help find you a friend 😝 We all have mobile phones. We’ve all experienced where it shows the device is in the backyard or the neighbours yard when in fact it is in the house and I’m not certain find my phone is even the same tech as the geolocation data anyway. And D’Souza absurdly claimed his cell phone location is accurate to 18 INCHES not 18 feet. In fact he said “12 to 18 inches” which is hilariously false. Experts said accuracy is 2-10 METRES at best under ideal lab conditions never mind real world environments Also geolocation can’t tell the difference between a moving object and a stationary object, it’s just the approximate location of the phone in the split second it was pinged. So there’s no way to tell if someone who was pinged was standing still directly at a box or speeding past the box at 100 mph on a nearby road Debunking links here: Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election? https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2N2XJ0OQ/ FACT FOCUS: Gaping holes in the claim of 2K ballot ‘mules’ https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-covid-technology-health-arizona-e1b49d2311bf900f44fa5c6dac406762 Conservative group tells judge it has no evidence to back its claims of Georgia ballot stuffing https://apnews.com/article/georgia-elections-true-vote-ballot-stuffing-199113b47bc2df79c63fdf007cd23115 Group featured in debunked ‘2000 Mules’ election doc admits it has no evidence https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/02/15/true-the-vote-2000-mules-no-evidence-debunked/ Former AG Bill Barr discredited the ‘2,000 Mules’ voter fraud film in a Jan. 6 hearing https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/attorney-general-bill-barr-trump-2000-mules-voter-fraud/

The circumstances, the intent are completely different, as I explained. Because there has never been anyone as debased and compromised as Trump. Cite please False. In fact they called 2 witnesses and could have called more. Why would they need a change of venue? Crimes are usually tried in the jurisdiction where they occur. And he is a national figure, it’s not like there is a venue where nobody has heard of him or has an opinion about him. It’s not normal for a person to recuse themselves because of their child. That’s usually for spouses or where there is a direct financial interest at stake . And Republican USSC justices Alito and Thomas actually have spouses who are outspoken partisan extremists and yet they never recuse themselves. No that’s your imagination again. There’s not been any twisting of the law. He was caught on tap plotting it. His co-conspirator, his former lawyer, already was convicted for it and testified against him. As per his usual schtick, he has no defence against reality so he screams conspiracy and demands you not pay attention to the facts being presented. Like Ive said his supporters don’t even deny he committed the crime they just demand their messiah is above the law and be granted complete immunity. It’s certainly plausible that other presidential candidates committed similar or perhaps worse crimes and made the allegations go away by discretely “playing ball” or pulling strings behind the scenes but Trump is unique in the myriad ways in which he is legally compromised, he isn’t isn’t just implicated in one scandal, he has many unrelated criminal investigations into his conduct and abuse of office. Also he is uniquely unhinged and clueless nature and he instinctively makes his own situation worse with his public personal attacks, rants and lies against any authority figure scrutinizing his activity. Also interesting hypocrisy that the people who claim to admire Trump specifically because he ignores and defies norms and conventions are now complaining about an alleged convention that wasn’t followed, don’t you think?

I just used that burn on Nationalist. You’re by essentially saying “No you are that thing you just said to him”…..tsk, that is not a witty comeback it’s just lame.

I wrote a lengthy post systematically dismantling the 2000 mules idi0cy and that’s all you have to say?

Sure, dodge the point that Trump just hilariously claimed he never said “lock her up”. Second, A civil fine by the FEC is not the same as conviction on 34 criminal counts. Hillary’s campaign staff reported all their payments to their law firm as “legal fees” (go figure) while the FEC felt the one particular payment should have been reported as “opposition research” even though it was paid to their lawyer. It was reported the dispute was only over the description. It’s likely that the staff who fill out these reports have no idea what each particular legal consulting invoice is actually for, there are undoubtedly dozens and dozens of them for anything and everything under the sun. They agreed to a fine with no admission of wrongdoing. That’s nowhere near the same as Trump’s hush money and conspiracy to falsify business records in order to hide the payment. And nobody is attempting to put Trump in jail. By all accounts he is unlikely to face anything other than a fine If Republicans really abhorred politically motivated abuses of power as they claim then they would not be threatening to do the same with vigour as soon as they get into power simply for “revenge”….not even if all their accusations and conspiracies were true, which they’re not. The reality is all these false and exaggerated claims of victimization and conspiracy have been cooked up in order to justify the corruption and authoritarian abuses they are planning. Every authoritarian regime in history has done the exact same thing. What else can you expect from a party whose members openly admire thuggish autocrats like Orban and Putin and who attract the support of every openly fringe fascist and white nationalist group in the country?

What are you talking about, debunking of the ridiculous lie of a film has been articulated endlessly since the day it came out including by former Trump officials like Bill Barr. For your edification, I have just done it again in my above post. I’ll post it wherever I damn well feel like, noob.

No, none of the 2,000 mules story, created by a convicted felon election fraudster is plausible. Your attempt to argue that that just because one of his baseless accusations was proven to be a fabricated lie doesn’t mean their other unproven baseless claims are untrue. If only the brainwashed cultists would apply that same logic to their judgment of Democrats / the FBI / the media / anyone who doesn’t worship Trump as a holy man. Lets recap: The felon D’Souza said he would release all his evidence shortly but to date has not released any - The convicted election fraudster D’Souza claimed he would release evidence proving cell phone data can track people to with an accuracy of no more than 18 inches, contrary to literally every non-partisan industry technical expert, who were all smeared as being Democrat operatives simply for disagreeing with the non-expert election fraudster D’Souza. So far D’Souza the felon has not released any such evidence because it doesn’t exist - The convicted election fraudster D’Souza claimed he would release evidence showing how they had “eliminated” innocent people who appeared to make frequent trips near a ballot box from their data simply because they pass by one that is near where they live or work. So far D’Souza the felon has not released any such evidence because it doesn’t exist. -The convicted election fraudster D’Souza claimed to have video footage showing the same people making multiple drops at ballot boxes and/or “stuffing” a large number of ballots, and that he would soon release the footage So far D’Souza the felon has not released any such evidence because it doesn’t exist. Every piece of video footage released only shows the person making one single visit much like the innocent man smeared by the lying felon and his cult goons who is now suing. No footage of anyone “stuffing” a box or returning multiple times has ever been shown - The convicted election fraudster D’Souza claimed he had evidence tracing the “mules” back to addresses that are known “Democrat” safe houses affiliated with DNC or left-leaning organizations. So far D’Souza the felon has not released any such evidence because it doesn’t exist. He has not released the addresses or explained in what way these alleged locations are connected to Democrats -The convicted election fraudster D’Souza has yet to explain how he knows said “mules” were stuffing the boxes with Biden ballots rather than Trump ballots or why no fraudulent / invalid ballots were ever detected The only way to cast a fraudulent vote is to steal the vote of another registered voter or to register someone who is not eligible to vote and neither of those occurred in any unusual numbers compared to previous elections. In summary, 2000 mules was an absurd and implausible lie from a convicted felon who previously plead guilty to election fraud, and it was sold to gullible suckers as “just take my word for it without question, I will provide the evidence later” which of course he never did because it’s all fabricated lies that couldn’t possibly be true. They couldn’t possibly be true because they defy basic logic and the reality of how cell phones and voting actually work.

So you fantasize about men and reciprocal reach-arounds. Got it. It seems Fascism has always had this strange homoerotic fetishism to it.

You are pure batshit. Do you masturbate to those sadistic fascist fantasies of yours?

The hilarious and shameless Trump gaslighting continues as convicted criminal Trump NOW absurdly claims he never said “lock her up” Now he’s soft on crime now that he’s been convicted of one Trump Denies Ever Saying ‘Lock Her Up.’ He Did… Several Times “Hillary Clinton — I didn’t say, ‘Lock her up,’ but the people would all say, ‘Lock her up, lock her up.’ OK. Then we won, and I said pretty openly, I’d say, ‘Alright, come on, just relax. Let’s go. We gotta make our country great.'” That is, of course, a lie. Trump not only beamed and nodded from the podium as his rally crowds chanted, “Lock her up,” he also said it himself, multiple times. He said it on Oct. 14, 2016, at a rally in Greensboro, N.C. As the crowd chanted the line, Trump said, “For what she’s done, they should lock her up.” In fact, he said it numerous times on the 2016 campaign trail, and he carried the line forward during his presidency. He even said it of Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in October 2020. When the crowd chanted, “Lock her up!” about Whitmer, Trump responded with, “Lock them all up.” And that same month, he told a crowd of the Bidens, “You should lock them up. Lock up the Bidens, lock up Hillary.” When a crowd chanted, “Lock her up!” about Dr. Christine Blasey-Ford, the professor who accused Supreme Court Justice Bret Kavanaugh of assaulting her when both were teens, Trump gave the crowd enthusiastic nods and a thumbs-up. As recently as last August, Trump hinted he might attempt to lock up his opponents. In an interview with Glenn Beck, the host asked, “Do you regret not ‘locking her up.’ And if you’re president again, will you lock people up?” “The answer is you have no choice, because they’re doing it to us,” Trump responded. Even with his conviction, it is unlikely that Trump himself will be “locked up” for any period of time. He will almost certainly appeal, and a prison sentence is unlikely for someone convicted of falsifying business records. But even though he faces a vanishingly small chance of time behind bars, Trump is all of a sudden painting himself as soft on crime. https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-denies-ever-saying-lock-151844115.html