Jump to content

Infidel Dog

Senior Member
  • Posts

    5,868
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

Everything posted by Infidel Dog

  1. Who said it was just about stores, or passports or social interaction? Did you even listen? Ultimately it's about the great "THEY" taking control of everything you say and do for as long THEY allows you to say and do it. Vaccine Passports open the door to a Chinese Communist style "social credit system." Where things go from there, who knows? https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/live-not-by-lies-the-coming-social-credit-system/ Once this system is in place it's only a question of how hard they want to use it. I get it though. You think Vaccine passports will only be used for vaccines and once the Chi-Comm virus is under control they will vanish. I imagine there were also believers back in the 19th century when they were told there was this thing coming called income tax but it was OK because it was just temporary.
  2. In fact here's the one that made me want to connect to the one above. It starts like this: "Vaccine passport sounds like a fine thing if you don't understand what those passports can do. It's not about a vaccine. It's not about the virus. It's about your data, and once this rolls out you don't have a choice about being part of the sysem."
  3. Currently when you sign on to an internet service you sign an agreement on whether or not you agree to that company's terms of service. You get to decide when you log on to TD bank or when you log on to Paypal. You're not walking around your daily life logged on to a credit score. You're in control. With the vaccine passports none of that will be the case. Everyone has to be participating all the time. If you don't participate you don't get into the supermarket to buy groceries. You don't get to meet with friends in public. You can't travel. Basically it's the Chinese social credit system they have for controlling their populace. In fact the Chinese will eventually be able to hook into the system. They control interest in many of the services that want to connect. And My God...will you dummies never learn to view the source rather than just come in strutting like you know all about it. It's no fun. You make it too easy to rebut your ignorance.
  4. The corporate left has offered some twisted whispers about this and Fox has actually talked about it, but Vaccine passports are something that needs to be shouted against from the rooftops. Naomi Wolf explains why: Hum your way past allowing Vaccine Passports and you're owned meat. You go nowhere or do nothing without China and your big corporate brother knowing about it then punishing you if they disapprove. Trudeau will OK this in a minute. You've been warned.
  5. In Canada you mean? I seem to remember hearing the knives to guns ratio as murder weapons for last year was pretty close. The gap is quite a bit wider in America. More guns used. About 5 years ago it was more knife murders to guns in Canada, I'm pretty sure. When gangs, crooks, terrorists and other crazies get easier access to guns or perhaps there's more of them, guns or criminal crazies, the statistic seems to go up - guns to knives. I'm not in the mood to chase stats but I think we'd get an interesting one if we looked for knife attacks per capita in the UK. Go ahead look it up, if you like. Then draw your conclusions. Whatever...knives don't kill people. People kill people.
  6. BTW, it's a general term. I don't believe you don't already know this. Or are you thinking that you've earned exclusive right to the term by nature of being a frequent practitioner?
  7. The 2020 election was rigged because common sense and a multitude of evidence that was never properly adjudicated in any trial by any judge says so. It was rigged in a way that included conventional fraud but even went beyond it to legal financial and media manipulation of the election infrastructure. You've been told all this before and not just by me. You know that's what I believe. Pretending you're hearing something else now only plays in Beaveville.
  8. Being childish won't make you right.
  9. The climate changes and so what? Get used to it.
  10. Beave, if I believed in the big lie I'd be your fan instead of you mine.
  11. In fact... Myself, I don't even listen to name bands anymore. I more prefer what I find on YouTube. For example I just joined the 4.4 million subscribers to this busker girl: and from there I jumped to this little drummer girl I find I like to watch as much as listen to:
  12. And if you were to get this "international cooperation" to "save the planet" from nice weather it would most likely appear in the shape of global governance. Or at least that's a risk I wouldn't want to take with little or most likely no reward.
  13. Hey, speaking of amusing...do you spend all day just digging through my old dead posts? Rock on then, Bud. it's nice to have a fan.
  14. Only in your politically perverted, progagandized imagination where what you'd like to believe becomes your facts. I don't hate Trump. I support a lot of his policies. I believe he did a pretty good job. In fact it may have been a little amazing in few of the resistance he met. Now that goes through the Beave fact distorter which appears to be all that's left between the ears and comes out saying it equals cult member. Believe what you believe then Beave. It's always amusing.
  15. The risk reward thing, you mean. You want us to invest in your insurance scheme because you predict a catastrophe of nice weather. The price is high. Not just in dollars. You want us to hand power over to you as to how we live our lives and what we do with personal property. But don't worry, you say, you can control the weather and then everything will be alright. Yeah, no thanks. What? No magic beans this week?
  16. You mean like wasting trillions of other people's money and putting power in the hands of either nefarious wannabe totalitarians or incompetent agencies at all levels of government including global because they tell us they can and must control the weather? Which is let's face it, ridiculous. Again I'm with Lomberg. Let's not. Let's adapt to whatever comes and use money and government in a less intrusive, more useful and responsible manner.
  17. Here's the thing. If you're not predicting a catastrophe who really cares? On this though, specifically... Kind of... Of course climate changes. I don't know of anybody who says it doesn't. Best guess is yeah, humans can be responsible for some of the change but nobody knows how much. There's not much evidence if any evidence we have much to worry about. We'll most likely adapt to any possible harmful change as we have in the past. I'm with professors like Bjorn Lomberg. Effort and expense could be better spent elsewhere:
  18. It's like Armageddon only with nice weather. Apparently somebody told the Chicken Littles of Progdom the sky was falling and they liked that idea. Yeah the evidence Carbon Dioxide has a warming effect on the atmosphere was around for some time before that. I forget the name of the guy but I think it was around the turn of the 20th century. 1910 or something like that. Doesn't matter. That has little to do with the skeptic argument. That argument has more to do with climate sensitivity, and the lack of evidence for "Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming.
  19. You haven't a clue what you're talking about Mike. 1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarmism
  20. Why? Did you have evidence of an imminent Warmageddon coming? Then by all means produce it. I and many others would love to see it.
  21. And here's how they do it: " At an environmental forum, Julian Simon once asked: “How many people here believe that the earth is increasingly polluted and that our natural resources are being exhausted?” After a roomful of hands shot up, Simon then asked: “Is there any evidence that could dissuade you?” Encountering silence, he followed up: “Is there any evidence I could give you—anything at all—that would lead you to reconsider these assumptions?” After more silence, Simon answered: “Well, excuse me. I’m not dressed for church.” Today’s Church of Climate holds three resolute beliefs: The human influence on climate is pronounced and controlling That influence cannot be positive or benign, only catastrophic Global governance can and must solve this problem https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/04/03/inside-the-church-of-climate/
  22. New to the internet, are we? Yelling requires all caps. OK that was cheap. Apologies. Peace.
  23. Damn...forgot the C. Kudos to you for being quick then. I would have caught it on a reread. That isn't the first time I've made that one.
  24. So you see then why it's hypocritical to try to point out Gaetz as some sort of proof of concept that populists own the sleazy sex story angle of the news. Also it's starting to feel a little desperate and needy.
×
×
  • Create New...