Marocc

A woman existed? How could it be?!

It's actually for Robert Spencer there to provide evidence. I looked it up. Two sources 1. Robert Spencer 2. Never heard. If the woman was dragged a km and got her hand ripped off, I would have found an article or two more.

Never happened.

I didn't realize the topic was whether someone likes PLO & Hamas or not.

Okay? A lot of people can be terrorists at the same time.

IDF is a terrorist group.

Perhaps we detect hypocrisy. When you see terrorism and you do not object to it, you are supporting it. Example: if you see a parent abusing a small child everyday and you do nothing, will the law see you as innocent or guilty?

Would you like continuous oppression of the weak?

Their roots are in Israel's terrorism.

It's sad how far you have to go to try and find something worse than your own..

ISIS members are not islamic fundamentalists. They don't follow the fundamentals. Then you favour Israel. More like, make it belonging to US aka Israel. You favour Israel again.

I see. It's not about the lives but about the money. Of course. Similarly as with being a witness to a murder, able to prevent it and not caring to, being indifferent to abortions is practically the same as supporting them.

I don't know exactly how racist you are, so..do you think the "black babies" should be aborted or do just hate people who hate abortions? The reason black women seek abortion more often is probably that they tend to be poor and in America there's this idea that if you're poor and get preganant, instead of getting money or waking up to this life in general, you're supposed to kill the baby. Probably the media's fault.

What's with the KJ version? I don't know of any woman in the bible taking it upon herself to end her blessed pregnancy. It is in fact against a woman's instinct. The question is, how come it is so difficult in the "glorious" America to practice a) birth control, b) restraint from immoral sexual activities or c) to have the baby once pregnant? The pro-abortion people say, "but what about rape, what about health risks?" Lets see the stats:

It is instinctive for humans to protect the vulnerable. The more vulnerable someone is, the more protected he/she often is and should be.

Why is it more bothersome? If you're going to say something can be hidden under clothing, you would have to acknowledge you suffer of an irrational fear.

I always thought this was for political discussion related to religion. In practice it's also for religious topics.

They teach in school that you need to ask verbally. They say it isn't sufficient to assume, but you should ask clearly and receive a clear positive answer before you go on.

Maybe she isn't use to men being polite. It puts some people on guard and causes irritation for no other reason but that it is not common to them.

What? If you're in an appropriate situation and ask, 'would you like to have sex,' that is not considered harassment. It's also one of the few normal obvious ways to approach the situation. Isn't this obvious, what I'm saying? (I hope it is)

No.

No one in particular. If you need a name, let's say, the msm. Is all "free speech" acceptable to you? I was thinking of the bigger picture; societies, the world as a whole. It isn't about me liking or not liking it, but God has commanded some things and prohibited others. That doesn't answer my question properly. I asked, is it bound to cause more harm than good? You say it is not because a homosexual cannot stop being homosexual — if I understand you right. That is like saying: no, it isn't bound to cause more harm than good because it is inevitable.

If one was to take the msm at face value, it would seem that it is no longer the goal to make being gay acceptable, rather the goal seems to be to encourage people to be gay. Is that acceptable? Does it cause issues? Is it bound to cause more harm than good?

Where do you see the scriptures saying that?

Why?