Marocc

It's better to buy from Muslims.

More of them wearing veils doesn't have to be (and in fact I believe it isn't) related to them being more religious. The article sounds like DoP wrote it.

You lie to everyone.

It depends on the situation. If they own the company they can usually say no. Of course if they say "it's because you're gay" etc they may be sued. But they choose their clients. If a private owner of a restaurant refuses to let someone in bare foot, that's his call. If a dog trainer decline to train a dog because the owners are Jewish all they need to say is "no thanks". They don't need to say why they don't take the job.

“I can confirm that the driver was not acting out of any religious or political motive,”

Exaggeration. I've seen it happen many times. (well I assume at least one of them was a Christian - statistical likeliness is higher) I don't think they take women in bikinis in either as a rule...

It isn't their obligation to serve anyone to begin with.

The media tells the masses what to be interested in.

What do those accomplishments have to do with "reform"? What is this standing up and denouncing "religious terror"? Why would random Muslims care? If a white man somewhere shoots people, do you go about wailing on TV for days to prove how sorry you are that someone from "among you" did that?

Even more realistically they mostly bomb civilians.

Yeah, let's make the civilians so desparate they'll go running at machine guns with their children! About 30,000 people were hanged during the last revolution.

Russia is not an "ally" to anyone. And that mass slaughter of civilians can't be called "helping" .

You'd be constantly wrong. You're welcome.

Wasn't my claim, I only corrected the wording in the quoted post. I doubt it. Yet, still just correcting your posts.

Pretty sure the amount of racism has significantly decreased since a few decades ago.

He said as corrupted and as contaminated pigs are considered in Islam, even male pigs don't try to have sex with other male pigs. So I consider that twisting of words.^ It wasn't just Zakir Naik.

Even you didn't want to watch it.

Lucky Israelis

In Africa you always risk there's a bomb on the plane. Outside of Africa you risk being shot down because of an international grudge.

17 prisons, 25 people. 1.47 persons per prison. No plan of action.

What is radical Islam? According to you people by large it is Islam, and what you call Islam, is the "faith" of a non-practising Muslim. That's why. a Muslim by definition cares for other people, but maybe you meant someone who let's other people be free so to speak. Like those islamophobes who say "practising islam is ok. Perfectly fine, but praying in public is a political act." they think Islam is something that must happen in private - hopefully they at least share that same logic with other religions.

You're not speaking out against radical Islam but against Islam. What you do is also called spreading of false information/propaganda, enticing violence against certain religious groups and hate speech among others. Hundreds of millions of dollars at the very least are being paid and received for such work in the world but you do it for free - judging by the quality of your work.

They aren't necessarily brides. One can marry the captive too if they like but it isn't necessary. BTW in those days in Arabia and elsewhere in the world before Islam when women were caught as captives there were no rules. The captive could be and was frequently forced into prostitution, any member of the household could have sex with her,she didn't have any rights, she could be raped and beaten etc. Islam made the rules: She cannot be beaten (or raped). Slapping a captive, whether male or female, would free the captive. She couldn't be forced into prostitution. Only one man was allowed to be intimate with her, if he chooses to do so the captive gains a similar position to a wife in the household. Etc. Well I hope I won't hear of you again then. ^^

You'd be surprised. Would be if you studied a bit of psychology and history.

2010, wonder if it still holds? Nice article, still very "objective": "A review of his lectures and interviews, however, reveals that Naik has spoken in support of Osama bin Laden, saying, “If he is fighting the enemies of Islam, I am for him.” He has also voiced virulent anti-American views, comparing the Americans to pigs, advancing the view that 9/11 was an inside job planned by U.S. politicians, and calling President George W. Bush “the world’s number one terrorist.” In addition, he has described the Jews as the Muslims’ biggest enemies, and has spoken in favor of polygamy and a husband’s right to beat his wife."