Marocc

Well anyway about the piece you quoted. It has nothing "extreme" or radical in it except for a few misquotiations and a few generalisations which I doubt he would agree with. These are a fundamental part of Islam, though their specific application to practice varies a bit: 1)certain types of music are considered haram and dancing in places with both sexs present. Some think women can't dance among themselves either. 2)There's a sharia ruling for cutting off hands, obviously(as if it was his personal opinion - what an objective article) 3)The "beating" of a wife verse is in the Qur'an. 4)Sex with a captive also in the Qur'an - except that in reality they don't have a "right" to sex, but they have a right to have sex if he and the captive so agree, seeing as sex outside marriage on all other situations is absolutely prohibited. 5)The Qur'an certainly does not assign death penalty on homosexuals. In any case a punishment isn't in existence legally for being a homosexuals, but for being witnessed having intercourse with a man. 6)I believe in some situations suicide bombing would be allowed in war outside of Islam as well.

Yes it would matter to me. Whenever you have something.

How do I "advocate" terrorism?

He's heard of him from the apostate prophet.

Actually, did Canada call him a radical?

Because you can see from here it isn't green?

"obsessed with Islam", no, you're not, you're ignorant about Islam and ignorant about your ignorance.

Everything's banned in Canada. https://bigleaguepolitics.com/canada-moves-to-ban-christians-from-demonstrating-in-public-under-new-anti-hate-proposal/ However, do you have a source that says he's banned? All I know he was denied access to preach in.. 2010?

You're gonna have to find something that proves he says it. As a video or a text that is credible in transmitting what he really said. Wikipedia is not a source - not to mention a credible one.

I doubt that it feels worse to be killed by a motivated person. In fact they might do it faster.

Apostate prophet? Is that you? ^^

Tell me one thing that supposedly makes him a radical. Just one thing. A small thing. Just one. DoP can help. Im sure you can come up with something. There's no doubt.

How would you know him to be or not be a radical islamist?

Which leads back to the lecture I posted. There are other "religious" terrorists.

Do I have to?

India, having a yet unconvincted (because for some reason India doesn't want to make a trial regarding it) terrorist in a central position in the government, isn't exactly the most reliable source to decide on the virtues and vices of others. Anyway, if you watch the video, feel free to point out mistakes in it.

A very interesting lecture on youtube by Zakir Naik, is terrorism a Muslim monopoly (157min).

How is a bomb blown up by a Muslim worse than a bomb blown up by someone else?

No and I still don't. Sarcasm isn't transmitted so well through written text.

I know but that has little to do what I just said.

There was a successful peace plan made and nearly implemented around 1948 when Israeli terrorist group (from which later stepped forward a terrorist who then became a government official) stern gang assassinated the man who made the deal - and the deal was off.

Israel is a terrorist state. Created through terrorism, upheld with terrorism..

"a Muslim crime" - the word Muslim literally means a person who follows Islam. There are no crimes that follow Islam. Personally I don't know what we're supposed to be discussing. You lead the way.

Because I don't label people I don't care about labels.

I don't have a problem with how they dress. It is not an indication of Obama being religious, however, but on the contrary, it is an indication that whether a believer or not Obama cannot IMO be considered a good practicing Muslim. Meaning if he did practice Islam, he would be neglecting a whole lot of it. So why would Obama be 'more' Muslim than Assad?