Yzermandius19

nah economic and social freedom are where it's at not just one or the other left libertarians trusting the government with too much economic control is naive af just as right authoritarians trusting the government with too much social control is naive af they both think it will help but really it often just makes the problems they are attempting to address worse moar government is rarely the answer

most people shouldn't gamble that doesn't mean there needs to be a law against it banning things is not the solution to problems that are drugs, gambling or guns related looking to the government for solutions in these areas is asinine they will just make the problems worse the libertarians are right

clearly not since you have the worst arguments in the thread by a country mile quite the display of low IQ thinking you're putting on you don't even argue against anyone's posts in this thread you just argue against the words you put in people's mouths like Cathy Newman

conserving the Liberal Party of Canada brand of progressive that's what Canadian nationalism has devolved into

a progressive who calls us progressive a Russian imperialist who call himself Nationalist he's a living oxymoron

and he has the gall to call us progressives lulz

your opinion on disqualification isn't relevant you have terrible arguments and you concoct idiotic reasons to ignore far better ones so you can maintain your delusional perception of being smarter than everyone who disagrees with you

I think that you and most Canadians think waaay too many guns should be illegal and possessing many of those guns shouldn't be a crime

criminals should be caught and charged for things that should be crimes not things that shouldn't be crimes you want to include the latter in the former, which means less policing of the things that should be crimes which means you are the pro-criminal one here

New Blue are the sane ones Doug Ford is a useless cuck

the only solutions you have make the problem worse even if my position was the strawman you are making of my position that's still notably superior to your position you can't even out argue the strawman that you constructed to make your idiotic idea sound better by comparison in a false dichotomy that's how stupid you're policy proposals are you can twist my words into dumbest possible version of my argument and it still dunks on the steelman of your argument puhthetic

these are the kinds of childish ad hominem strawmen you resort to when you have no good points typical Nationalist

America is great Canada doesn't work

Austro-Hungary collapsed for a reason so will Canada and it will be an improvement just as it was when decrepit Austro-Hungarian Empire and Ottoman Empire collapsed

and that has been a mistake further proof it's a bad idea

no they aren't these are people problems not object and substance problems you can do drugs and not be an addict you can use guns and not commit violent crimes you are targeting the wrong things

they've still lost market share it's better than when it was illegal that's why the government should be less restrictive of private business if they allow more competition that will cut into organized crimes share even more, not less

drugs and guns aren't a problem addiction and violent crime are a problem you want to take resources and manpower that could be used to address the latter to police the possession and distribution of inanimate objects and substances that's hella stupid

you are making the problem worse as is Trudeau Trudeau with his gun restrictions you with your drug restrictions and Canada ends up with the worst of both worlds if you want to reduce crime take the law enforcement resources and manpower used to police drugs and guns and put them into policing actual crime that matters derp

you are trying to protect them you want them to keep their monopoly on drugs increasing their profits I want competition to cut into their profits prohibition empowers gangs the historical record is quite clear your strategy always backfires quite spectacularly Al Capone knows

doing something is overrated if that something is counterproductive or doesn't address the issue the drug laws you want increase crime and empower gangs decriminalization of drugs decreases crime and takes away the drug monopoly from organized crime

that doesn't work new gangs will replace the old whack a mole they can't even win the war on drugs in prisons what makes you think they can win it on the streets? wishful thinking is a helluva drug

I suggest looking for solutions that don't involve more government in people's lives which will just make those problems worse most people's knee jerk reaction is for the government to get more involved in such problems and when that doesn't solve the problem, it's only because they weren't involved enough so double down on failure and keep exacerbating the issue

their body their choice you're also wrong prohibition leads to more addicts not less see alcohol prohibition for a prime example

false I don't want obviously counterproductive controls and/or controls that violate people's fundamental rights but you do