Yzermandius19

Selling out to the ChiComs, it's should be no surprise this is the preference of the Eskimo Communists.

The media has been subsidized by the Liberal Party of Canada, it is the Liberal Party media arm, whether you are too blind to see it or not. Canada has no free speech, and never did, before or after the twitter mobs. Just because all speech hasn't been banned yet doesn't mean we have free speech dude, your standards are way too low. We have no property rights, the Crown owns the land, we merely freehold it for them, you can't actually buy it. The West being more individualistic doesn't make them big on individualism. The North is not big on individualism it has become so dependent on federal government handouts to the point that many Canadians use the plight of the indigenous in the north as justification for Confederation to continue, so Ottawa continue bribing them into staying because they are too poor to go it alone. Me and Smitty call them Eskimo Communists. Fugazi Country. You cling to something that never actually existed, except in the minds of the rubes. This "nation" deserved to eulogized long ago, right from it's shotgun marriage inception.

Don Cherry is different. That was about the twitter mob, Peters was not. I don't care what the stupid hockey media says about it, they don't know shit, they are part of the twitter mob, they are looking to pat themselves on the back for something they had nothing to do with.

Constant government intervention in the market sounds like Marxism. F*ck that. Bring on the correction.

The twitter mob claiming credit doesn't mean they deserve credit. Cancel culture had infinitely less to do with this than Calgary being in the shitter and needing a coaching change anyways. Talk to me when the twitter mob gets to someone who wasn't about to be fired anyway.

Like I said, they had plenty of other reasons to shit can him, this only sped the process up by like a week or two. If they had never found out, it still would have happened.

Anecdotal evidence of rare instances is not proof of systemic racism or sexism.

They claim victory almost as often as ISIS, pay them no mind, Calgary just sucks.

She thinks if men predominate in an occupation or sport, it's because of the systemic sexism of the sport or occupation, she thinks if white people predominate an occupation or sport, it's because of the systemic racism of the sport or occupation. All disparities are explained by discrimination to her, especially if that disparity favors white men, she can think of no other explanation. She's Antifa, she sees discrimination around every corner and under every rock, because she wants to pretend that the cause she is fighting for is more just than it actually is. Hence why she thinks everyone is a white supremacist, including you. Simple minded indeed.

You talk about nothing but accusing others of racism for merely disagreeing with you. You're entire schtick is "The Girl Who Cried Racist".

According to jacee, any success white people have is due to racism against non-whites, if it wasn't for white racists holding non-whites down, white's wouldn't have any success at all. Therefore because most of the best players happen to be white, hockey must be racist. She projects her racism on white people to excuse her racism against whites.

Anyone who points out hockey is no more racist than any other sport is a white supremacist? You really do see white supremacists everywhere, and basically think all whites who play hockey are racist, projecting your own racism on others.

That isn't why they were fired. The twitter mob had nothing to do with it. If the twitter mob gets a coach fired that doesn't deserve it, then come and talk to me. If Bill Peters gets fired, it's because Calgary is in the shitter, not because he's racist.

Maybe that's because the last time a Clinton was office the Dems passed the AWB. It's not a conspiracy.

There is racism in every sport, hockey is not extra racist. Just because mostly white people play it, does not make it extra racist. Posting articles is not an argument, make your own arguments.

You think all white people who disagree with you are white supremacists though, which makes you just racist in general. Pretending hockey is an inherently racist sport, because white people like it, talk about a dog whistle.

You don't look hard at all. I know for a fact that you have attended events of people you consider to be a white supremacist who do have large audiences, so this just goes to show your lack of popularity canard is just a lame defense mechanism to help you feel better about shouting down these events.

F*ck your article. You're the anti-white racist projecting your racism on white people, acting like a sport is racist because mostly white people play it while not attributing the same malice to sports where mostly non-whites play.

You're lying or you never looked for an audience and just assumed everyone in the crowd agreed with you. That does not excuse your conduct, even if you were right, which you're not.

What racism? Hockey is no more racist than any other sport. Why are you singling out hockey? It's okay to hate on a sport that is mostly played by white people and pretend it's more racist than a sport played mostly by black people? Is that what you're getting at?

It's not being cheap doesn't make it only for white people.

I am talking about you being Cantifa. You clearly support shouting down right wing public speeches, and have admitted to engaging in this activity, with lame excuses that it's just you exercising your free speech rights, they aren't very popular so their audience has no right to hear them speak, you're right to be a jerk comes first and you've written the entire audience who wants to hear them off as racist anyway, so it's all good.

It's not either or, it's for "everyone", and for well-off white boys too. That's no crime where I come from.

Only people who don't agree jacee get shouted down, everyone who agrees with jacee is free to speak to freely, selective application of silencing the voices of dissent there as well. That's why I brought it up, do try to keep up.

Indeed, whether on the right or the left, it's not the fault of the offensive speech that someone got violent as a result, and neither side should be banned. No double standard here.