Yzermandius19

the people who think covid is so dangerous that all your rights must be taken away and support the authoritarian crackdowns used to do that

cut off Quebec's bribes ftw Vive le Quebec libre

you are nitpicking unimportant things it is obvious that most of the media has a strong left leaning bias and there is hardly any media holding a contrary opinion the occasional right leaning source existing does not disprove this obvious dynamic it is much closer to 100% left than 50/50 left-right, so stop defending the media

projection is a helluva drug

it's been constantly getting better, not going the opposite way humans were far more rapacious of the environment in the past than today the wealthier we get, the better we take care of the environment the historical record is quite clear, your feelings do no match reality

It comes closer to that standard than others by a wide margin so why not criticize those who are the furthest from the standard, instead of raging about those closest to the standard and ignoring everyone else? your bar is too high of course everyone comes up short of it, this is not insightful observation on you part, I grasp your silly point, it is you who does not grasp mine perfect is the enemy of good

you work with an imaginary perfect standard that will never be met I deal with reality and actual results I'm the realist, your the naive idealist you ignores reality to tunnel vision on a lack of perfection, only able to see the negatives and ignoring all the positives to wallow in misery if the entire world's environmental record was as good as those doing the best, the environment would be a lot better off yet you blame them for lack of perfection which is petty nitpicking while ignoring the elephant in the room why don't you start focusing on criticizing those doing the worst instead of ignoring them and focusing on criticizing those doing the best as if they are worst?

perfect is the enemy of good just because those with the best environmental records aren't perfect doesn't mean they aren't the best it's a better example than any other example being set

totally false again I'm voting PPC I think Trudeau is terrible I'm just not deluded into thinking O'Toole isn't unlike some people my attack on O'Toole is that he is Trudeau, not that Trudeau is good and O'Toole is bad that's kind of a dead giveaway that you're strawmanning my position thinking O'Toole is bad doesn't make someone a Trudeau supporter

if you can't name anyone who is better you have no argument saying the west is bad is meaningless when everyone else is worse

and supply management

yeah because his riding political views are a joke

my position is straightforward not hard to understand no need to decipher I guess reading comprehension is in short supply these days

I am pointing out that Scott is guilty of dehumanizing individuals to justify their murder as not immoral and using whataboutism of others dehumanizing individuals to justify their murder as not immoral in order to justify the morality of his position by claiming a logically inconsistent false moral high ground that point is far from moot

how it started is not relevant logical consistency is relevant those who are being inconsistent and are invoking the dehumanization of certain individuals to justify murder of the dehumanized while only being able to see the immorality of murdering those they haven't dehumanized are being immoral regardless of which individuals are being dehumanized regardless of who is dehumanizing them

"they" is whoever it is that think the murder of an individual that falls into a certain group that they have dehumanized is somehow not immoral for nonsensical reasons

nor should they killing someone for being a moron is not a moral position to take

false dichotomy why kill either except in self defense or in defense of the life of others? criticizing abortion advocates for dehumanizing the unborn to justify killing the unborn and then turn around and dehumanize those who have been born to justify killing them this is not logically consistent and is hypocritical that's not pro-life that's pro-young life

suggesting there is no way to confirm that there is anything meaningful to a new born because you see no value in it and use that rationale to justify the position that killing it is not immoral that's just evil

O'Toole is bad on identity politics the only real difference is he panders a little less shamelessly on it but he cucks to it nonetheless, so even if he doesn't constantly harp on it he isn't going to prevent it's spread either he'll fold in the face of it, like clockwork he would govern almost exactly like Trudeau the only real difference would be what he says not what he does and even there, he sounds a lot more like Trudeau than Scheer who sounded too much like Trudeau and was clearly a cuck and he certainly sounds a lot more like Trudeau than Harper who for all his talk, got nothing done, and caved to Liberal agenda constantly himself see Doug Ford for a prime example of how cuckservative politicians claim to be on the side of conservatives and blow sunshine up their asses but governs as if he was a liberal and many conservatives are totally fine with this just because his party affiliation as if that is a meaningful distinction O'Toole is clearly more of a cuck than Ford and yet look how indistinguishable Ford is from the Liberals who came before him especially in the wake of covid so why you'd give O'Toole the benefit of the doubt after the Doug Ford debacle is just very naive Canadians don't even know what a real conservative is they just elect fakes who aren't as vocally progressive as their opposition yet govern as if they were vocal progressives regardless how many times do you need to get burned on that hot stove before you realize that if you touch it you're gonna get burned again?

so you're mad Trudeau called an election even though it gives you the opportunity to unseat him as PM, which you claim is of the utmost importance would you rather him just stay in power for longer and then call the election in a few years? if anything, according to your own logic, that getting rid of Trudeau is what matters most, Trudeau did you a favor by calling an election, so why are you complaining about it?

there isn't a Canada worth saving now and that won't change if Justin O'Toole is elected either Canada can't be saved

I will vote PPC just because you don't think I am right, doesn't mean I'm wrong I have offered far more detailed explanations on why he is the same on huge key issues than the far less detailed explanations presented as to how he is so much different from Trudeau regardless of who is right and who is wrong, at the very least, my argument is the better made argument y'all need to seriously step your debate skills up, to get anywhere near the same league as me, on this issue

saying that western civilization isn't perfect on sustainability doesn't mean they aren't the most sustainable civilization around every other Titanic is more prone to sinking

most of electorate can't handle the truth and will only vote for politicians that blow sunshine up their ass not that I'm making excuses for them, that's just the sad reality of it the people vote for politicians to strip them of their freedoms to feel safe and the politicians strip people of their freedoms so they will vote for them this is why a true public servant would either not get elected in the first place or wont last long in office because too many opportunistic grifters will lie and cheat to get elected and exploit their opposition tying one hand behind their back by having integrity