QuebecOverCanada

Everything you said in this text is true, but it has been a general consensus throughout the liberal media to say that immigrants do support an open border which is a fallacy. As well, the media says it is because of racist reasons that immigration should be drastically lowered and quickly, well, it's not true. And it's even wronger to say that it is a white supremacy argument and you should be dismissed for saying that. And throughout your text, we see that also, other races are racist. The Chinese typically don't like other races, and I've seen and lived it in a short travel in China where I would teach French in an University for free food and travel across the countryside. They love money and the Canadian passport, I can smell that though. I was proposed more marriage at least 3 times while my black friend had no offer what so ever and came from a richer Nigerian family who immigrated to Canada than my own family which is really well off.

No, but for yourself, you may have a hierarchy of values, no? And you may identify with a group rather than another one because the values present in a group are more prevalent than in anothers', no?

And the market within the group decides which direction the group goes?

Don't you think there is a marketplace of ideas too?

There is a hierarchy of ideas that hold a certain truth above others, don't you think? And don't you think some groups adopt different ideas?

Isn't that a logical thing to say, since it is factual? Your comment is paradoxically illogical lmao. Read you wrong

You may be against the principles of some groups though, it's called having judgement.

We talk way too much about them and are of such less significance that the mainstream media shows us, I am not offended by them either since Black Supremacists exist, Asian Supremacists exist, Latin American Supremacist exist as well. I am against all of those groups ways of thinking, but they may exist and may have a biological function to the human specie, since all living species tend to congregate together as Blocks rather than having individuals thinking for themselves. Nations exist for that reason. Nations are by nature discriminatory, so are herds and packs of animals (with some overlap) Look at this; This is a picture showing where all the different pack of wolfs occupy the Yellowstone National Park. Interesting how they occupy the land just as humans do in large groups, called nations, isn't it?

In the 'academia' definition of far right, it is a slander, used with nazi, to denounce those who don't obey or align 100%with the politically correct ideology, I agree with you totally that now being called a far right by those lunatics is now a badge of honour and defense of free speech, but for those on the left who became more and more radicalized over the years, it is definitely an insult. By the way, I'm totally against Nazis and White Supremacists, I feel that we should consider the character of each individuals and their ideas rather than judge by the race, eye color or else. But I feel like I have to justify myself since we amalgamate all those who are denouncing the socially left leaning dogma as being the latter.

It seems that not only the Canadians coming from the Founding Nations (French, English and of course all the Natives) have something against illegal immigration, and that the slander used toward Canadians who don't support illegal immigration as being 'Far rightists' and 'White supremacists' isn't that appropriate to qualify after all, and that immigrants, who are legal, tend to protect the status of legal immigration, since they have been through the process themselves. And slogans used in rallies that were slandered as far right by the media, such as 'Not in my backyard', 'Make our home safer' seem to be used equally by the Chinese than by the Whites who are called racists shouting these slogans. Are we at the eve of a social revolution in Canada, where immigrants may be leaving the Liberal Party and NDP to the Conservatives? https://news.vice.com/en_ca/article/gyngex/how-anti-immigrant-rhetoric-crept-into-chinese-canadian-politics

No way a Yellow Vest protest could happen in Canada or even Québec. The youth of my generation had what, the 2012 Spring where they smashed windows because marxism and student fees, but otherwise nothing happens here. The French do not surrender as a population to their government. They are tougher than us Canadians, thus their standards of living being much better than ours (better and cheaper food, good apartments, very historic and beautiful cities, good salaries).

They were posted at about the same time, by the way.

Two articles about the same subject, but it is CNN and CNN International Reporter with checkered past comes back with Trump Tower Moscow bombshells for BuzzFeed https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/18/media/buzzfeed-reporter-jason-leopold/index.html Mueller's office disputes BuzzFeed report that Trump directed Michael Cohen to lie to Congress https://edition.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html Do not just read the headlines, read the articles as well.

And you too Goddess

Did she misbehave? Because that's what I would think if I were a primitive that would have never watched the preachy Gillette commercial. Thank you for the feminists who made those ads, very woke indeed!

Kids who play fight learn; Honor, kids who fight have a code of honor, and I remember it very well, like don't kick when someone is down, don't hit the balls, etc. as funny as it sounds, kids who weren't playing fair were punished to the proportion of their abuse, if someone bit someone, he would get kicked for example. Competition, because as kids who are fighting one another, you learn that you have to fight to get something, like in most aspects of life. Respect, as if you win, it is because you are talented or stronger than others, and not because of relationship power games or because you have the approval of the teacher like a sucker.

Have you ever met a mangina before? Or do you like them that much compared to attractive, well balanced men who like competition?

The context matters. If a man with his camera crew asks a woman to smile for a video, it's not automatically harassment. Especially if women in the first clip dance in bikinis thrusting her hips to shake her ass as it appears on my screenshot.

These women that appear at the pool first here?

No. The ad is trying to stop the kids from fighting first hand. It's baaad to fight you know. You could hurt yourself or another person. So bad. So violent.

Sure, he's in distress because he's losing the fight, like any boy playing rough and tumble games... Then you get up and you start again like all the little boys do, except those who are mommy's boys aka the snitch who will tell the teacher and will in turn get bullied savagely as revenge by other kids.

Now we're talking about the ad and not my 'machiavelic' intentions toward women or that I formulate my post badly, we're getting somewhere. Look at the commercial again. -Rough and tumble play for kids that are separated = bullying? toxic?  -Men standing next to a bbq saying 'boys will be boys' = bullying? toxic? WTF is up with the bbq thing? -Telling a woman in party to cheer up = Sexual harassment?

Shifting the debate to the form of what's been said is pure damage control.

You really do have problems with exchanging with others it seems, especially understanding a conversation. It doesn't make it look like it's what you said, it makes me look like correcting what you said to fit my opinion that you mischaracterized since you were out of arguments.