Dougie93

America no longer has an opt out clause, the opt out clause was overthrown with the rest at the foot of Cemetery Ridge, 1500hrs 3 July 1863

The Office of the President is immune from felony charge, the person in that office has to be removed from it, before he can be charged with a felony, again, hence why Impeachment.

He's immune by separation of powers, he cannot be charged by the executive when he is the executive, that's why they have impeachment. The President could even invoke an Executive Order Article II to have any charges stayed, for national security reasons. Thus, first you have to impeach, then you have to remove him from office by two thirds super majority in the Senate. When he's a private citizen again, only then can you charge him with a felony. But without the smoking gun, Trump himself on tape incriminating himself, you won't get the super majority to remove him.

Whatever, you'll find out, they're not going to charge the President with a felony. They might try to impeach based on the testimony of rats like Cohen, but that won't be enough. The only thing that brought Nixon down, was the smoking gun, Nixon on tape committing a felony. That's why Nixon resigned. if it had just been rats no tapes? Nixon would have survived. If Mueller had the smoking gun, we'd already be in the Senate for the trial. Thus, they don't got shit.

Separation of powers, the head of the executive branch of government cannot be charged with a felony while in the execution of his constitutional duties. The mechanism for removing a President from office is impeachment and no other.

A sitting President cannot be charged with a felony. All you can do is impeach. You can't impeach for a felony, High Crimes and Misdemeanors is not a felony charge.

This is in fact exactly what is going to happen and the process has already begun, although it doesn't have to be a violent break, it can all be done in an orderly fashion, peaceful self determination by democratic means under the Clarity Act, Quebec goes first, Ontario right after, everybody else will have to figure their provinces out once we are gone.

Causation correlation fallacy. All prosperity in Canada is by way of the Americans, Donald J Trump was of course merely stating the obvious, in that if America cuts Canada off from American corporate welfare, it would be the ruination of the nation. Canada is a failed state which is simply propped up by the Hegemon, if the Hegemon were not propping it up, Canada would rapidly decend into civil disorder, and Quebec would immediately break ranks, then Ontario right after, because it would be a race to get the best deal from the Americans, and Ontario would lunge at that and away from falied Confederation in a heartbeat.

It's the theme of the rendered judgement of the SCC which has ruled that, yes, Marge, Canadian Confederation is in fact optional, and provinces are free to leave anytime they please.

Bear in mind, America is winning, America is going to win it all, all the slaves everywhere will be freed, the world will be made into America. Its just a question of getting through this transitional phase, blocked by launch of warning hair trigger alert. If the breach of launch of warning can be averted, Peace Through Strength, then I would expect America to set off for the stars, eventually at relativistic velocity. I mean, there really hasn't been any peace since the First World War, launch on warning is a frozen conflict, but it doesn't have to be, once liberty is secure, stand down.

In the context of an America which will never by its nature accept mutual vulnerability, and which as a people have no desire to be the cause of Cormac McCarthy's The Road, it is essentially the only way, barring capitulation from the other nuclear powers in the face of it.

Except McCallum is the only one who knows how to deal with Beijing, that's why they picked him. I mean, who are they gonna send to Beijing now? Climate Barbie? That didn't go over so well the last time, they got kicked to the curb.

Success is sayonara Quebec, F**k Alberta, Governor General at Queen's Park in Toronto, Ontariostralia moves on without you, do you what you want with your own New Zealand's. Same thing Quebec is doing, I'm just doing what they are doing, because they have the right idea.

America is already moving towards this eventuality, all the high yield countervalue warheads are being removed from the arsenal, the bombs are getting smaller, more accurate. The reason is that America is moving towards a total counterforce option, no countervalue with uranium casing because that will just rain back down on the CONUS. N-bomb will be a logical step in this process. America will cease to target industrial assets at all, targeting only the warfighting capability of the adversary regime, and workers who uphold it.

Very plausible. Most likely cause of a countervalue exchange is a launch on false warning, and not by nor under the control of America. If that happens, the northern hemisphere will be devastated for decades to come. Safest place on the earth in the event of by the prevailing winds, will be Cuidad del Este on the banks of the Paraná in Paraguay, which is likely where the banking sector will flee to. This is because the H-bomb is way overkill, it just rains back down on you by prevailing winds. Hence why N-Bomb. "Peace Through Strength" ~ Curtis LeMay

No, and at this juncture, only the Americans have the money and wherewithal to deploy them, because while it is a simple concept, they are still tricky to manufacture.

That was the rubric of the Anti-Nuclear Movement which Jimmy Carter caved into. It makes no sense tho. The N-bomb will still impose unacceptable causalities, so mutual vulnerability is not destabilized by neutrons. The fact that it is more viable an option, makes it a more credible deterrent, in that the other side is far more inclined to believe that you will use it, so they are even more deterred not less.

Correct. Almost all the radioactive fallout comes from the uranium casing around the two-stage physics package of the H-Bomb The explosion sucks all the debris up into the mushroom cloud where it is seeded by the burning uranium, this then rains back down as fallout. Take the uranium casing out, and the full blast of the fusion, in the form of neutrons, bombards the target for just a split second, like a lethal camera flash. Detonate it above the target rather than at the surface, you get no mushroom cloud, and no fallout, just the flash, which kills the people, but leaves everything else intact with no radiation.

I like Castle Bravo. Tsarskaya Bomba had a higher yield perhaps, but it didn't make a bigger bang. Castle Bravo changed the world. The main effect of Vanya was that it incited Andrei Sakharov, the father of the Soviet H-Bomb, to become a dissident against the Soviets.

The Soviets didn't call it Tsar Bomba The Soviet code word for the RDS-220 was "Vanya" which means "Ivan" The Americans called it "Tsar Bomba" Obviously the Soviets were not ones to invoke the monarchy which that had overthrown in a hail of bullets.

Yes. Not a panacea, just Australia and New Zealand. Who work fine as separate Dominions, but would not work in a confederation, because Australia would dominate it the way Ontario dominates Canada resulting in a similar failed state.

You invoked British Heritage and then you immediately forsake it. British is not a race, British is not a place, British is a system of governance. The British Empire was not white supremacist, for example was perfectly willing to brutally repress snowy white Irish Catholics, while elevating swarthy Indian monarchs to positions of absolute authority in the Raj. The purpose of the British Empire was to retain India and the Far East by way of Egypt. Anybody who got in the way was the enemy, anybody who was maintaining the route through the Suez, was an ally. The ultimate enemies being North Germans, just like us, Kaiser Bill & Co from Prussia. Then his little buddy Hitler, who was South German.

Bear in mind, if the British lost Egypt, then the British have lost India, if the British had lost Egypt and India to an Islamic Jihad, then the war is over and Germany has won. The British however staged their own Jihad, led by Thomas Edward Lawrence CB, DSO. Lawrence of Arabia waged the British Jihad against the Ottoman Turk, and thus is how the war was won for Anglo-America.

Furthermore, International Jihad was not invented by Muslims, it was invented by the Germans. The British Empire was majority Muslim, so Kaiser Bill & Co invented this thing, in World War One. In the hopes that they could incite the majority Muslim population in the Empire to overthrow the British Crown.

The ring leader was WASP by ethnicity, the two Asians were culturally WASPs, born and raised in London to be Upper Canadian. I don't see militant Salafism as being an existential threat, it's just banditry, a minor annoyance for all empires. Muslims come in different varieties, the Shia are not bothering anybody except Israel, Sufis don't bother anybody at all. In terms of the British Empire, Muslims were the majority in the Empire, when Britain took the Raj from France in the Treaty of 1763, so Islam has been British, for 256 years. By faith and/or ethnicity, in order of majority, the British Empire was Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, African, Canton Chinese, then WASPs were the minority by many orders of magnitude.