Dougie93

This is why Confederation is a failed state. There is no national interest. In order to fabricate one, they have to erase the central narrative of history. This is fundamentally corrupt. This corruption permeates every aspect of government in Canada, like the Kremlin does in Russia.

Indeed, but that's everything, that's the whole shebang. Here's what happened; the Liberals wanted to tamp down the Pequistes, so to appease them they erased Canadian British History in 1965. This created a vacuum. The Cultural Marxists filled that vacuum with Eskimo Communism to their own ends, which was to establish themselves as academic aristocracy running a vote buying plantation to fund it.

In terms of the central narrative, 1648 > 1688 > 1759 > 1763 > 1776 > 1789 > 1812 > 1866 That is completely submerged into an ocean of Eskimo Communist Cultural Marxist Social History canards. Whatever Canadians are taught about their history in school, the cause and effect how why and what for is a mystery to them. It's like trying to learn about America without starting at Bunker Hill, rather just skipping straight to civil rights and feminism of the 1960's without any further ado.

Mr. Ivan is my adversary, but not my enemy until such time as he crosses the Article V line in force and/or the Hague Convention is invoked. Until such time, diplomatic channels are open. I do diplomacy with everyone not sworn enemies of the House of Windsor, so far as I know, HM UK Government has invoked neither Article V nor the Hague Convention.

I have no quarrel with Russian contacts, to wit, so what? First amendment protected free speech, which of course the autistic screech lefties cannot abide, thus how they sidelined themselves in the first place. Thanks for that lefties, you just handed the SCOTUS over for generations to come. <doffs hat>

Always amazed at the capacity of lefty losers to be butt hurt about losing. Rage is a poison in of itself.

Neutron bomb; no fallout, follow up strikes as you like, watch and shoot, watch and shoot.

Whatever works, when Mr. Ivan is right, Mr. Ivan is right. Live and let live, is perfectly viable, unless and until the Article V line is crossed and/or the Hague convention is invoked.

Stand off from Tarawa. Neutron bomb it. Wait. Land and bulldoze bodies into mass graves. Mission accomplished. Friendly KIA; 0 Friendly WIA; 0 Friendly POW; 0

All roads lead back to the neutron bomb. The Super-Super, maximum deterrence against rational actors, maximum flexibility response against suicide cults masquerading as states and all such comers in extremis.

If it's just one bomb, that's not an existential threat, the Jihadis only present an existential threat at the threshold of unacceptable casualties; if and as they acquire a comprehensive capability, which will require a fully functioning industrialized state to be their Islamic State. Most viable options; take Pakistan and/or depose the House of Saud and take Aramco

The Siloviki would be hard pressed to deploy a neutron bomb force to even replace a portion of their uranium encased arsenal, that would take them decades, which they do not have. Never mind that; neutron bombs on both sides is entirely optimal, that way, when the launch on warning/false warning inevitably occurs, it does not result in Cormac McCarthy's The Road, rather civilization carries on in the wake, no cobalt thorium g effect. The Jihadis will not likely acquire an existential threat unless and until they take Pakistan and/or depose the House of Saud, at which point, you'll need those neutron bombs to take them down clean.

Neutron bomb is the all purpose super bomb, the Super-Super, takes on all comers and is in fact the only credible deterrent as nobody really believes anymore that anyone will use a two-stage with uranium casing.

If you're worried about fallout, make it a neutron bomb, no fallout no problemo, plus it will scare the bejeezers out of Mr. Ivan, reasserting the Balance of Terror needed for MAD

Strontium-90 has a half life of 28 years, we're good to go for another round, bust a cap in dat bitch, at Eniwetok <popcorn>

The other spooky thing about it; "you grab one of ours, we grab two of yours" that's very Chicom spy war esque.

Indeed, although what he said is true, in that the Canadian bench is quite independent, judges have a lot of power and they know it, and they're not going to be pushed around by anyone, to include the Americans, altho they will have to rule as to why they are not extraditing her, and then the Crown will likely appeal on the spot.

That's not a niche, that's a grocery list. We're gonna do some shopping with other peoples money is not a brand, other than kleptocracy.

If you're going to be a "fusion", what that is has to be laid out in clear in simple terms as a brand, like Conservative Democratic Party, or Democratic Freedom Party, etcetera Everything you need to know about the Nazis is at a glance in the branding; National Socialism. The post scarcity utopia promised by the socialists, but only for the Germans,

Platform schmatform, a platform is tactics not strategy. Strategically, you have to find a niche, one is that not being serviced by the other parties, a gap in the market, a power vacuum which can be filled. Your platform is just platitudes, right off the bat Army Guy is calling bullshit on you from the ranks, can't kid the troops, don't even try. You need to find the niche, and then make that into a brand, which is not going to be "Syncretic", which is fallacious babble, nobody votes for a paradox.

Step one; stop trying to be all things to all people, there is already a party which tries that, they are called the NDP, if I wish to vote for fairy's and unicorns, I've got Jagmeet Singh for that.

This is why Anglo-America is incandescently wealthy and so rules the world, British rule of law since 1759, to include both the British North American monarchy and its American republican progeny, and why at the same time, Latin America is a basket case, born of autocratic rule over slave states, which were not overthrown at the foot of Cemetery Ridge.

They just walk over the border and then invoke the UN charter right, then hang out indefinitely by exploiting the failed nanny states inability to govern. There's no way to stop that with all the Queens Horses and all the Queens men, they couldn't even secure the border of New Brunswick never mind Canada.

The Canadian government is broken tho. Confederation is a zombie failed state, there is no national interest and never was, and the last nails in the cofffin was hammered in, the moment the Pequistes came a hairs breadth away from ceding, and then the Liberals allowed them to essentially leave, but be bribed into pretending that they didn't for public consumption. This is state of governance cannot fix anything, it just flails about pathetically, which is why Canadians are angry all the time at all the governments in Canada. The state of affairs does not degenerate into civil disorder for two reasons; 1) British Westminster Parliamentary Supremacy persists, upheld by Elizabeth Windsor who remains above the fray of Confederation. 2) Special access to the Global Hegemon's economy props the zombie up.

The best pawns to hold are the foreign agents, as most countries wouldn't care if you grabbed random civilians, you grab the foreign agents when you're in a spy war like this one here. That's how you get their attention, grabbing some tourist is no leverage, the tourist is not asset, so the other side is not worried about them. The amount of freaking out about Spavor and Kovrig is disproportionate to a random snatch, it just generates an even more spooky air around their already spookish profiles.