Jump to content

Nefarious Banana

Member
  • Posts

    2,115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Nefarious Banana

  1. 1 hour ago, blackbird said:

    Sorry, but that is false.  The King James Bible (1611) is absolutely an accurate translation of the Bible.

    The New Testament is based on the Received Text and the Old Testament is based on the Masoretic Text.

    This website has hundreds of article and videos on the King James Bible.

    The King James Bible Defended! (jesus-is-savior.com)

    Beware, the Devil doesn't want anyone to trust the Bible.  That's why lots of lies are often spread around.  What you said is a common lie.  There is no truth in it.  God guided godly translators who used trustworthy copies of manuscripts to produce the King James Bible (1611).  There are thousands of manuscripts and parts of manuscripts plus ancient sermons that were preached using Holy Scriptures that can be used to verify the accuracy of the King James Bible today.

    It should be pointed out that modern versions are based on corrupt manuscripts and a false theory of two men, Westcott and Hort who produced a corrupt Greek version in 1881.  All modern versions take their lead from the corrupt work of these two men.  That has led to much error and confusion.  But the KJV (1611) is the only absolutely accurate and trustworthy version.

    Many belief systems/religions around the world . . . all are wrong, according to you.  

  2. 14 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

    It does not matter.  There is only a slight chance a new leader could do better than Trudeau against Poilievre at this point and with the time remaining.   Oct 2025 is the next election I think.

    Hoping he stays . . . to realize the contempt that the majority of Canadians have for him.  

  3. 22 hours ago, blackbird said:

    Perhaps if you studied the Bible, you might know it is the word of God and all others you mentioned are man-made inventions,   What part of the world did you come from that makes you have such animosity against the Bible and Christianity?  

    Through countless revisions, interpretations, translations, and deleted  chapters/books . . . how can the Bible be the 'be all-end all' answer to the multitude of religious belief systems throughout the world?

    • Like 1
  4. 12 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

    I can't say I actually like Canada myself

    I hold to my oath to the monarch under the Constitution Act, formally as a condition of residence

    but I've always found Canada to be a left wing lunatic asylum

    it's been this way for my entire life

    I think Canadians actually deserve to the Trudeau dynasty

    there's really nothing more Canadian than the Trudeau's

    they are the royalty which Canadians choose in lieu of the British Crown

    let Canadians wallow in their usurpation

    "I think Canadians actually deserve the Trudeau dynasty" . . . . No!, eastern Canada deserves the Trudeau fungus.  Western Canada should be a country unto itself.  

  5. 2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

    this was the same sort of thing his father PET was advancing back in the 70's

    Pierre Trudeau was frankly just as hated by conservatives, for the same reasons

    Justin is really just trying to live up to his father's legacy

    National Energy Project, to runaway inflation, this is just the 1970s all over again

     

    Both Pierre Elliot and Justin have a hatred of Canada . . . both are traitors.

    • Like 1
  6. 8 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

    my state is the Glorious Revolution born of the Scots Protestant Enlightenment

    the supremacy of God & the rule of law

    the Bill of Rights & Westminster Parliamentary Supremacy

    Constitutional monarchy & the separation of powers therein

    the Post National State and associated Chinese Communist infiltration is obvious usurpation

    God save the King from these ignominious traitors

    'Glorious Revolution' . . . 'Scots Protestant Enlightenment' . . . etc., etc., etc.

    Meaningless to the many . . . .  what's your point?

  7. 19 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

    this is the arm of decision of totalitarianism

    subjugating the masses by forcing them to accept the absurd

    those who dissent mark themselves as enemies of the state therein

    "enemies of the state" ?  . . . . . many view the state as the enemy.  

  8. 6 hours ago, blackbird said:

     I doubt the taste is that much different than wild caught but I have not compared them myself.

    Canada imports a number of different fish and people buy it all.

    The availability of fish-farmed salmon at a lower price makes it more affordable for a large portion of the population who would otherwise not buy any salmon.  Not everyone can afford the high cost of wild caught salmon.  It is quite expensive and only caught during a short period each year.

    Calm down Mr. Zealot . . . fish farm salmon is a poor product.  Fish farms have brought disease and parasites to numerous pristine spawning streams/rivers.  

    Taste and compare . . . 

    • Like 1
  9. 7 hours ago, blackbird said:

    Wild salmon fisherman have a reason to be biased because farmed salmon are a fraction of the price of wild salmon.  They are a tremendous benefit to society and producing them creates a lot of jobs.  But of course it is some competition for fishermen.  But is that a reason to ban an industry?  I don't think so.

    How is it possible to get an honest opinion on this subject.  Not very likely.

    How many or what percentage of wild salmon are actually affected by the fish farms?  That should be the question, not whether a tiny percentage may be affected.  As I said, everything man does has some affect.  Just how much of an affect is the real question.

    Numerous studies/examples of effects on wild salmon stock . . . results are of no benifit to the wild stock.

    Farmed salmon taste off . . . there were package warnings about eating it too often.  The cat wouldn't touch the stuff.  Good enough product to ship to the easterners who couldn't tell the difference between salmon and salami.

     

    • Like 1
  10. 19 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

     I am mostly apolitical and I now live in Northern Nevada.  

    Utah/Nevada state line runs through Wendover . . . Utah side:  gas station, sandwich shop, etc.  . . . empty streets!  Nevada side:  casinos, saloons, pawn shops, whore houses, etc.  Utah licence plates everywhere!

  11. 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

    Shame on you... that is incorrect nomenclature. Indigenous is what was demanded by your kind LOL

    Y'all did'nt like Indian, so it became natives and ya didn't like that so it was changed to aboriginals and ya didn't like that either so you demanded indigenous and y'all don't use that now either.

    Y'all have become a government teat  sucking culture that cannot even decide what you want to be called LOL

    What a clown you are . . . 

  12. 26 minutes ago, myata said:

    The fact is, as someone noted, just one Republican on the jury who could have thought that the case is politically motivated could have hung it. You see, it just wouldnt' connect. You would see it right away, the only two things needed are the eyes that see at least some of the reality honestly and objectively and a bit of the brain that still works.

    Thirty-four convictions in one day . . . a lot of thought and deliberation went into that  outcome.  Trial was a sham.

  13. 9 hours ago, herbie said:

    Which is why I reject the 'why should Canadians have to DO anything' argument. Like a child asking why when China pooped in the pool why can't Canada swim with only skidmarks on their bathing suits.

    As for teaching your 'spawn' to stick their thumbs up their arses and do nothing for another generation..; well that's real leadership, eh?
    Kind of like saying 'it's natural' when a polar bear is charging at you so you kneel and pray.

    "Don't 'Bogart' that joint my friend . . . . pass it over to Hardner."

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...