blackbird

More evidence in the report at the link below. quote When Quebecers are thinking about the federal government these days, they are not impressed. How come a G7 country is not able to issue passports in less than three months? Why can’t it deal with an immigration file in months rather than years? How is it that the government can’t ensure there are enough security and customs agents at major airports to process travelers within an acceptable time frame? Unquote André Pratte: Federal gridlock is a threat to national unity (msn.com) Bureaucracy has a natural tendency to constantly add new rules and procedures for every little thing they do. That is why the size of government tends to grow and grow and grow with more procedures, rules, and involving more bureaucrats in every step of a process. This slows the whole process down for the smallest project. Then when people are off work for reasons such as Covid, files pile up and are not dealt with in a timely manner. The process just drags on and on. Of course government unions like more bureaucracy because it means ever increasing numbers of employees and union members. It easily gets out of control and politicians can do little about it because the problems and roadblocks are buried deep in bureaucracy, which is out of reach of politicians. They must depend on their subordinates who are often outside the actual workings of the bureaucracy themselves. So on and on it goes as the problems are unresolved.

Trying to accommodate every heathen religion and woke ideology is turning Canada into a cesspool and you support that. Promoters of that destructive ideology promote it by using weasel words like "inclusive". Anybody who disagrees is called a racist or exclusionary or intolerant. The word inclusive is very deceptive because it means including every evil ideology and belief system.

It would not be brainwashing because Christianity is biblical and therefore true. You forgot to mention our society is based on Judeo-Christian culture and beliefs whether you like it or not. If you lived in the western world the last 1,700 years you would have found that is the way it was. If you live in other parts of the world like the middle east you will be forced to conform to Islam's laws and rules with no basic human rights. Be thankful you live in the west which has freedoms and rights that are a result of it being historically a Judeo-Christian society. Such freedoms and rights do no exist in much of the rest of the world.

One of the consequences of an extreme bureaucracy such as Canada has is the long lineups when arriving at an airport from outside Canada. They have something called the ArriveCan app which you must have on your smart phone (if you have one). This is a bureaucratic requirement which you must use when you arrive. It has been found to contribute to the slow processing of people arriving from outside Canada. The government refuses to remove it even though countless mayors and other authorities have been begging for the government to remove it so travelers can move at a more normal rate. Another example of bureaucratic bungling is the rescuing of Afghan refugees who worked for the Canadian Forces. The government claimed they would take in 40,000 Afghan refugees but so far it is only a fraction of that. There have been endless reports of very slow government processing of paperwork and difficulty of Afghans obtaining a VISA. Of course we see the horrendous problems people are having trying to get passports where they have been lined up for days at a passport office. Another example of bureaucratic bungling and inability to adapt the system to the circumstances.

This interesting article pretty well describes Canadian government as well as American. Canadian government may actually be more bureaucratic and intrusive on everyone's life. They seem to pride themselves on being leaders in so-called "progressive" legislation. The Canadian government are leaders in such things as same-sex marriage, medical assistance in dying (MAID), (over 21,000 people have died by MAID in the last few years since it started) and making abortion a part of health care although it is about as far from health care as anyone who thinks about it could imagine. Around 80,000 to 100,000 abortions per year. A description of government that suits Canada. quote “A big, bumbling, generous, naive, inquisitive, acquisitive, intrusive, meddlesome giant with a heart of gold and holes in his pockets, an incredible hulk, a ‘10-ton marshmallow’ lumbering along an uncertain road of good intentions somewhere between capitalism and socialism, an implausible giant who fights wars, sends men to the moon, explores the ends of the universe, feeds the hungry, heals the sick, helps the helpless, a thumping complex of guilt trying mightily to make up for past sins to the satisfaction of nobody, a split personality who most of his life thought God helps those who help themselves and only recently concluded God needed help, a malleable, vulnerable colossus pulled every which way by everybody who wants a piece of him, which is everybody.” Unquote From AM to PM, the fickle force of government is with you (msn.com)

The rainbows/pride ideology goes against many people's religious beliefs and we still have freedom of religion. The whole pride movement has more to do with pushing their belief system and trying to normalize it and silence any naysayers and less to do with equal rights.

I don't see a pride parade or rainbows on crosswalks or on CBC, CTV news as anything to do with "equal rights". I see it as forcing a perverted ideology or lifestyle down everyone's throat. It is state-sponsored brainwashing. Not everyone agrees.

We are being bombarded daily with the rainbow accompanied by a mad drumbeat on CBC and CTV daily. What next? If anyone thought the CBC and CTV were unbiased or neutral media not under the control of the liberal left, radical progressives, think again.

Horgan's NDP MLA Josie Osborne was made a minister and her department just gave a grant of 15 million dollars to an environmental organization. She is under the microscope and being examined now for possible conflict of interest because her husband sold some land to the organization a few years ago. The environmental organization is called MakeWay which changed it's name from Tides Canada. This organization was the target of the Alberta government as a oil/energy industry opponent. The organization distributes money to various other environmental organizations across Canada to fight various "social justice" causes. So in effect our taxpayer money is being used to fight for radical environmentalism and against the energy industry and other industries that Canadians depend on. How is it our tax dollars can be used for what are essentially political causes while the health care system is in a crisis and gas prices are out of sight? Tides Canada rebrands following ‘smear campaign’ - Environment | Business in Vancouver (biv.com)

After years of doing nothing about the failing health care system in B.C. and 900,000 people without a family doctor, it is time he retired. All I have heard him do is blame the feds for not contributing enough money for health care. But he doesn't seem to realize it is the B.C. provincial government who has the main responsibility for health care. Since Ottawa was not contributing enough money for B.C.'s health care, Horgan should have acted and properly funded it in the meantime until the problem with federal financing is solved. Socialists want to promise every kind of service but they are failures when it comes to financing their promises. Since the Socialists ban private health care they have a responsibility to provide the necessary care, not just ignore the needs of the people as they have done.

Why should Canada or western NATO countries stop funding and supplying weapons in Ukraine, which wants to be part of the democratic western nations? Without NATO and the west's help, a brutal, authoritarian dictatorship may completely destroy and take over the Ukraine and then what is next as it would have expanded it's size and control of the world? Russia, China, N. Korea, and Iran are the great Axis of Evil that are in fact a real threat to freedom in the world.

This situation at Babine Lake with the federal and provincial NDP government signing an agreement with the Lake Babine Band to hand over 22,000 hectares of crown land in the coming years is not unique. There are other similar deals that have been made without the consultation or approval of Canadians. Ostensibly this land will be used to create a logging industry for FN. But how much study has been done to find out if FN will in fact be interested in working in the logging industry and actually doing a professional job of utilizing this land? If they do and it results in them getting off government support, then that would be a good thing. But I am not so sure that will be the outcome. Secondly, why is it necessary to give them absolute title to the land instead of just granting them timber rights for a certain number of years to see what they actually do with the land? FN people are traditionally enthusiastic hunters and fishermen, not loggers. Hunting and fishing is seasonal and does not require the white man's work practice of working 8 hours days for five days a week for around 49 weeks per year not counting statutory holidays. That has always been the stumbling block for FN people. They prefer their own work schedule and only seasonal for the men. The women must work all the time of course maintaining the home and family. So I am not sure how trying to get FN to start a logging industry is going to work. This is just a fact of life and one of the obstacles white people have faced in settling and trying to employ some FN people. Not all of course, but some have trouble adjusting to white man's ways. They no doubt see white man's work ethic as a form of slavery as you must admit it does infringe of one's freedom to some extent. On a smaller scale, deals are being made periodically to hand over control of certain areas without consultation or approval of Canadians or even the non-native populations that live in the region or area. These areas are not FN reserves but are part of what natives claim as "traditional territories", a ambiguous term that covers 150% of B.C. It is a useful term for FN activists who claim the land as their own. Local and provincial politicians (particularly the woke) seem to be aiding and abetting them by their repeated land acknowledgements which are made at the beginning of meetings by mayors and public announcements by politicians at all levels of government. Where will all this take us? To compound this dilemma is an American-controlled forest industry company recently made a deal to build a commercial campground around a tiny lake on Vancouver Island with the cooperation of a FN band and gave the campground an unpronounceable FN name. It now appears that a forest company is acting like a government and creating campsites and handing them to FN. I am not saying the campsite is not a good thing; it is a wonderful campground and camping is a reasonable price, but ordinary non-native Canadian citizens have absolutely no say in this. In essence a foreign company is taking over our land and doing with it whatever they please. It is the principle that is at stake here. What is happening to our land we call Canada and what is happening to the rights of the 95% majority of Canadians who have no say in these things?

The resource extraction is not out of control. It creates thousands of jobs and contributes billions of dollars to pay for your health care, welfare, pension or whatever you live on. The Indian rights/reconciliation industry produces nothing but takes from the taxpayers who will never escape paying and paying with no end in sight.

It might have an impact on me if the federal Liberal and Provincial NDP governments are giving large areas of land to FNs as part of their vision of "reconciliation". It might impact a lot of people in the area who have lived there for all their life and their ancestors also lived there. Also that handover of large tracts of crown land might be repeated closer to where I live and could have an impact of me and my relatives. Everything government does sets precedents that can be repeated elsewhere. So yes, I think it is a reasonable concern. All Canadians should be interested and involved in what is happening in their country at the present time whether it is next door to their town or a thousand kilometres away.

Immigration is just life. Nobody has sole claim to the land. God created it for everyone. You just need to learn there are finer details of how everything must work. Everyone has a right to life, and to the fruits of their labour. Nobody has a right to expect some other demographic to support them forever and give everything to them on a gold platter simply because they had ancestors in a province or country before Europeans arrived. FNs lost most the land long ago when Canada was formed and were given reservations. Now since then there have been agreements to give them more land, but that is not an unlimited process. There are limits how far that can or should be done.

Nothing happened that I was aware of or approved of or had any part of. Lots of my tax dollars have gone to support FNs but I don't complain about that. I just think there has to be a limit and your NDP, Liberal friends are not rational or reasonable about the subject.

The Smithers area is a very advanced town of thousands of people and they produce a lot of lumber, mining in northwest B.C. and lots of dairy farming in the valley. If you whine about them being there, you should prove your sincerity by stopping drinking of milk products and stop living in homes built with lumber from white man's sawmills. Also stop reading and using paper that comes from pulp mills and stop using other products that were produced by white man in B.C. because it was all produced on what natives claim is their "traditional territory". In fact what are you doing here living on their traditional territory?

Again, why should Canadians living today have to pay for mistakes made back in history? I don't agree with a lot of the things that were done to FNs back generations ago, but I and my parents and grandparents had nothing to do with it. How is giving chunks of crown land and millions of dollars to native bands going to be fair to generations of non-natives who live in the areas and work going to solve past mistakes? I don't think it is solving anything. Just creating a new set of problems. We should not forget that reparations for specific harms done in residential schools have been paid and continue to be paid. How far do you carry that? If you go by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's recommendations, Canada must give the land back to the natives and pay billions of dollars for everything imaginable. Hardly a realistic proposition. People have always migrated from one part of the world to another. That is the history of the world. Endless generations should not burdened forever with paying compensation for what earlier settlers did. Have you ever heard of the Norwegians, Scandinavians, paying Britain for the Vikings invading the UK and all the atrocities they committed? I didn't think so.

The local people are the non-natives who live around Smithers Landing which is on Babine Lake and others who own cabins or vacation homes there. Also, the people in the town of Smithers and surrounding areas. Nobody knows how this large land grant in the Babine Lake area along with self-government for the Babine Lake band will effect everyone else. I lived in the area for nearly 30 years and know the area fairly well. Lots of non-native people hunt and fish in the whole area as well as guide outfitters work in the area. Lots of Americans and Europeans travel into the area to fish and hunt and stay in one or more of the fishing / hunting lodges. Not exactly sure how this self-government thing will work and whether non-natives will be prevented from using or entering certain areas. Lots of people feel we are all Canadians and the distant governments in Ottawa and Victoria and their bureaucrats should not be dividing people up and creating certain privileges for certain people without consulting with and giving the local people any say. The non-natives get along well with the natives. But distant political outsiders are dictating or creating a new kind of order for political reasons. There are thousands of non-natives who live in that part of the northwest who should have had a say in all this and know exactly what is being proposed. This area is part of the provincial and federal riding area for NDP politicians who seem to have their own agenda and not interested in consulting the local non-natives in their riding.

God is not hiding his existence. God makes his presence clear in two ways. The first half of Psalm 19 makes that clear. quote 1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork. 2 Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge. 3 There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard. 4 Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them hath he set a tabernacle for the sun. 5 Which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race. 6 His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof. unquote Psalm 19: 1-6 kJV The clear evidence of God is the creation all around us. In the second part of the Psalm God has spoken to us clearly through his inspired Word, the Bible. quote 7 The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple. {law: or, doctrine} {converting: or, restoring} 8 The statutes of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes. 9 The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of the LORD are true and righteous altogether. {true: Heb. truth} 10 More to be desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb. {the honeycomb: Heb. the dropping of honeycombs} 11 Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there is great reward. 12 Who can understand his errors? cleanse thou me from secret faults. 13 Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins; let them not have dominion over me: then shall I be upright, and I shall be innocent from the great transgression. {the great: or, much} 14 Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight, O LORD, my strength, and my redeemer. Unquote Psalm 19:7-14 KJV

I don't think you even read the information or looked into it. I have done my part. You have to do yours. Otherwise, I can't see much hope. Eternal life depends on having the faith and faith depends on a degree of understanding of these issues. So unless you intend to have a lost eternity and miss out on the chance for heaven, you need to start learning the truth. The KJV Bible has the truth. The lies from the world could be a hindrance and block a person from learning the truth and way of salvation, which is very much connected to this issue of creation versus evolution. Not much more I can add.

We often hear Trudeau and Liberals toss around the word reconciliation and now we frequently hear politicians at all levels routinely make land acknowledgements at the beginning of a speech or meeting. But how much have we heard about what this actually all means? I recently discovered that the Federal and Provincial BC government signed a three way deal called the Lake Babine Foundation Agreement to begin the process of handing over about 22,000 hectares of land to the Lake Babine band. This band comprises about 2,500 people in about five different FN communities around Babine Lake although some of the communities are only occupied seasonally by a small number of people. Babine Lake is the longest lake in B.C. at about 110 km. and is situated in northwest B.C. I have fished on Babine Lake many times over the years. The people who live in a small community or have recreation cabins/homes on Babine Lake at a place called Smithers Landing were notified after the fact and invited to attend a public meeting in Smithers to hear about this agreement about six years later and make their own opinions known at the meeting. You can watch them raise their questions and concerns on the video link below. This was after the fact. Apparently the fine points of the deal are still to be worked out. The main agreement had already been made between the federal government, the province of B.C. and the Lake Babine band in 2014 without consulting or including the non native people who live in the area and the town of Smithers which is about 90 km from the lake. Of course the people who live or have cabins or homes at the lake are greatly concerned. But it crossed my mind that this may be just the beginning. This is being done under the claim of reconciliation. There is talk by the government that the Lake Babine band will receive valuable timber lands that could be used for logging and hopefully they will get into the logging business. But there are a lot of concerns of how this will affect non natives in that area who use the area for recreation, hunting, guiding outfitters, and other things. Will the natives block access to the area or through the area for one thing? The value of the land plus about 50 million in cash included in the agreement will come to a total value of about 200 million dollars. For 2,500 people that works out to an equivalent value of $80,000 for each man, woman and child. But the bigger question comes to mind. Is this a sign of things to come in countless other communities across B.C. and Canada? Is this part of what politicians mean by "reconciliation" without actually spelling it out. We know the 94 calls to action from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission are mind boggling and completely beyond affordability or reason for Canadians. Read a little of the 94 calls to action through Google and see the endless demands that are included. It should also be noted that the politicians that make these decisions to hand over large tracts of land do not live in the area and are not personally effected themselves. They have no skin in this issue. It costs the politicians nothing, but could well have unknown impacts on local people, which we do not yet understand. Babine Lake – Smithers Landing – Fishing Northwest British Columbia (fishingnbc.ca)

For the moment, I wish to respond to your point on evolution. In actual fact, it is called the "Theory of Evolution" meaning it is not a proven fact; only a theory. It has been found wanting by many experts and scientists. The book Refuting Evolution can be read online. But the conclusion in the book gives these points. This is somewhat lengthy; so I hope it is not deleted. Otherwise you can go to the creation.com website and find the book online there. There are also study guides to help study the subject. There are a number of topics within the subject which refute evolution. Quote Conclusion This book has addressed the main arguments for evolution presented by Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science and found them wanting. By contrast, the evidence for creation is cogent. In particular, Refuting Evolution has covered the following areas in its nine chapters: Chapter 1: Facts do not speak for themselves, but must be interpreted according to a framework. The leading evolutionists are biased towards naturalism, to the extent that many are outspoken atheists. This is especially true of the National Academy of Science, the producers of Teaching about Evolution. Conversely, creationists admit that they are biased in favor of creation as revealed in the Bible. Although they have the same facts as evolutionists, interpreting them according to a biblical framework results in a more scientifically cogent theory. Chapter 2: Adherents to both the biblical creation/corruption/flood framework and the particles-to-people evolution framework teach that organisms change through time, and that mutations and natural selection play a large part in this. But evolutionists assume that the changes eventually increase the information content, so that a single living cell (which they claim arose from non-living chemicals) was the ancestor of all other life. Creationists believe that separate kinds were created, and that changes generally either remove information or leave the total information content unchanged. The examples of ‘evolution in action’ presented by Teaching about Evolution do not demonstrate the information increase required by evolution. Rather, they are examples of variation within a kind, and are consistent with the creation framework. Chapter 3: Evolutionists since Darwin have predicted that the fossil record would show many intermediate forms linking one kind of organism to a different kind. Instead, the fossil record shows that animals appear abruptly and fully formed, with only a handful of debatable examples of alleged transitional forms. It is also doubtful whether one can even imagine functional intermediates in many cases. Chapter 4: Birds are unique creatures, with wings and feathers designed for flight, and special lungs completely different from those of any reptile. Some evolutionists propose that birds evolved from gliding tree reptiles, while others propose that birds evolved from running dinosaurs. Each group refutes the other so convincingly that a reasonable conclusion is that birds did not evolve from non-birds at all. Chapter 5: Whales are mammals designed for life in water, with many unique features. Teaching about Evolution asserts that whales evolved from land animals, and presents an alleged series of whale intermediates. But on close analysis, none stands up. For example, we find that the fossil evidence for one alleged key intermediate, Ambulocetus, is fragmentary. Another alleged intermediate, Basilosaurus, is actually 10 times the size of Ambulocetus although the book draws them the same size. And an evolutionary vertebrate paleontologist points out its peculiar body and tooth shape mean that Basilosaurus ‘could not possibly have been the ancestor of modern whales.’ Chapter 6: Humans are very different from apes, especially in intelligence and language. Teaching about Evolution presents a series of alleged apeman skulls. But the evidence shows that humans and australopithecines are distinct kinds. This includes analysis of the semicircular canals in the ear and the canal that carried the nerve to the tongue. DNA similarities between humans and chimps are exaggerated; the dissimilarities correspond to encyclopedic differences in information. A common creator is a better explanation for both similarities and differences. Proper drawings of embryos show that different kinds have very different embryos, not similar ones, despite the claim of Teaching about Evolution. Chapter 7: Teaching about Evolution presents the usual big bang theory. However, there is no satisfactory evolutionary explanation to explain how the universe could come into existence without a cause, or for the formation of stars and solar systems after such an alleged ‘big bang.’ Teaching about Evolution also discusses the Galileo controversy, but misses the point. The church had adopted the Ptolemaic framework and interpreted the Bible accordingly. Secular defenders of the framework persuaded the church leaders that Galileo was really contradicting the Bible. Moreover, the verses (mis)used to teach Ptolemaic astronomy were often from the Psalms, Hebrew poetry (unlike Genesis) that was clearly not intended to teach a particular cosmological model. Also, other biblical passages (mis)used were using the earth as a reference frame, a scientifically accurate procedure. Chapter 8: Teaching about Evolution teaches that the earth is billions of years old, and uses the fossils and radiometric dating as ‘proof.’ However, there is evidence that many rocks and fossils were formed by catastrophic processes, which is consistent with the biblical framework that includes a global flood. Radiometric dating theory relies on several untestable assumptions about the past, and the methods have often proven false and even self-contradictory in practice. Ninety percent of the methods that have been used to estimate the age of the earth indicate an age far younger than that asserted by Teaching about Evolution. Chapter 9: Living organisms have encyclopedic quantities of complex, specific information coded in the DNA. Interestingly, this is precisely the criterion that would prove that a signal from outer space has an intelligent source. DNA itself is the most efficient storage/retrieval system in the universe. The information it stores is the blueprint for all the enzymes required for life, and the recipe for building the complex organs needed. Some of these include sonars of dolphins and bats, and the miniature motors driving flagella or making the ATP molecule. These are far more complex than anything humans have built. Other structures have inspired human inventions; for example, the lobster eye inspired an x-ray telescope design. Finally, it is shown that the design explanation is legitimate, and that the only reason to reject it is an a priori faith in materialism. Thus, there is good reason to take the biblical creationist framework seriously, and every reason that students should hear the evidence against evolution. Unquote Refuting Evolution chapter 10: Conclusion - creation.com Some main points that should be examined are the Theory of Evolution and the later modifications to the theory do not support the essential processes evolutionists claimed. For instance, there are no transitional fossils that credible show evolution for example from land creatures to birds. There are no fossils or evidence to show life formed from non-life or chemical matter to biological living cells. In fact the evidence leans more toward creation than evolution. The other point is creationists do believe that creatures may modify over time, but this is not evolution. According to Genesis God created the various kinds of creatures. Birds for example, were always birds, but may have adapted or changed to a different bird through modification over time. But fish or animals did not become birds. There is no evidence to support the claim that they did. In fact, if you study the material in the book Refuting Evolution and perhaps delve into it further, you will find the science actually support creation more than evolution. There is a vast amount of information in a simple cell, let alone a living creature. The amount of information in a cell could fill many sets of encylopedias. The fact is for evolution to be a fact, new information in the DNA, RNA, etc. would have to have been added for new creatures to evolve. But science has found new information is never added. Living organisms have this vast store of information that determines how they are structured and function. Only God could have designed them like that. In other words everything required an intelligent designer to be created and exist.

The simple fact is many people cannot afford the high cost of accommodation in the west coast communities. It is up to the government (local municipal, regional (ACRD), and provincial to look after homeless people. It is also up to these governments to provide sufficient provincial parks, and forest service campsites for tourists and outdoor enthusiasts. Not everyone has the money or interest in the crowded commercial campsites around Tofino. The ACRD and other bureaucrats, local authorities should stop treating people like filth, stop ticketing everyone they can, and start working toward providing the camping facilities for people. They should also be working to provide accommodation to the poor and homeless instead of punishing them and trying to force them to go somewhere else. Tofino has just as much responsibility to look after the homeless and poor people as any other town on the island. Of the total population in the regional district, natives have nowhere near 50%. The ACRD represents the whole region, not just the native villages which in total is a very small number compared to the tens of thousands of people in the region. Therefore they have no right to be 30% of the board of directors which speaks for and represents the whole region.

I am one of the victims of the climate "crisis" and the highway robbery of carbon taxes since 2008. I was robbed of $2500 from 2008 to 2016 in the form of carbon taxes imposed by Premier Gordon Campbell and the BC Liberal government and saw no rebate. Quote How many times do alarmists have to fall for lie after lie … like Al Gore’s claim that the polar ice would melt by 2013; or Obama’s science advisor (John Holdren) said CO2 induced famines could kill as many as a billion people before 2020; or the father of global warming (James Hansen) said in 1986 that temperatures could rise by 7 degrees Fahrenheit by 2020 (but it only rose by 1 degree Fahrenheit); or Al Gore’s science advisor (Michael Oppenheimer) said in 1990 that by 1996 the Platte River of Nebraska would be dry and the Mexican police will round up illegal American migrants surging into Mexico seeking work; or Prince Charles said in 2009 that we have 50 days to save the planet from catastrophe; or the UN climate official (Noel Brown) said in 1989 that entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000. There’s hundreds more of similar alarmist claims over the decades — but you get the idea — they’re all lies. Unquote Man-made climate change scam - Villages-News.com