hot enough

That would only come after you provide some evidence.

Just provide evidence, Omni.

Just provide evidence for those events, Boges.

" it's okay.........we're only kidding?" is said and done all the time, Betsy. US presidents, US soldiers, US CIA, US ... have murdered tens of millions. You know this and yet do you ever say, "What about the victim? Where is justice for him?" [Yes, others besides US ... .]

That's funny, Betsy, actually hilarious, you suggesting others "deflect from reality". You can only do a "don't think I've ever made a claim that you wouldn't find any goodness among Muslims!" Telling.

Always with the bold statements/fabrications. Where is your evidence? Never able to answer any questions. Why, Omni? 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum?

There was no immediate stop. You are neither a scientist nor a good observer. The plane wasn't going 600 mph. In fact, with the WTC2 plane, the nose/missile came out the opposite wall. And the engine that flew to Murray Street, only problem, it wasn't an engine that was in the alleged 767-200 that supposedly hit the tower. WTC designers planned for that in the design of the towers. And the amount of jet fuel was quite insignificant.

Such deep, penetrating thought.

If you had the needed courage to go and see you would find out that you are advancing a fabrication.

Given the overwhelming evidence that it was not 19 Arab Hijackers, I would think that there would be thoughtful and substantive discussion on the myriad problems this event has engendered. Again, not to be mean, I can't make any sense of your post, eyeball, but I understand that this isn't going to be something that people will get their head wrapped around any time soon.

Not in the least, Omni. They are people like you who know nothing about the science or the events of that day who continue to defend the indefensible US government official conspiracy theory but can't seem to provide any evidence, not one tiny speck that substantiates that wacky conspiracy theory. Nor can any of you address the stark truth. The absolutely undeniable things that you can't and won't deny but refuse to address. None of you will answer any question. 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum?

Where are the guilt ridden folks who have slaughtered tens of millions of people in over 70 illegal invasions since WWII? Not to be unkind but you don't have a clue about what is needed for nanothermite. Did you even read the article of the US scientists describing this new super explosive? Why hasn't there been anyone from the US government, any of these scientists come forward to explain the presence of nanothermite, actual unreacted pieces of it, plus the by products of thermitic reactions in WTC dust? 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum?

That's a fabrication, another in a long line. You are too frightened to engage.

Why are you science deniers so afraid of answering questions? 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum?

Then stop raising it in other threads. I only pointed out how unscientific you are "there's tons of evidence ...", and you got your panties in a twist. Scientist don't make silly proclamations like "there's tons of evidence ..." and leave it at that. [moved it to Grenfell]

I know that you will do anything to avoid that issue because you are frightened, but if you will note, in this exchange between you and me, you are the only one who mentions the "dreaded issue".

Nanothermite is an important issue. 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum?

You claim that about everyone who doesn't believe what you want them to believe. Rue was called specifically on some false things he had said and he failed to address them. You are doing the same thing here now.

You remember incorrectly. Are you speaking for both of you? As regards you, I apologise.

MLW believes that people should be trustworthy and act like adults in discussions. It's particularly disingenuous to accuse someone of " promoting bizarre conspiracy theories" when you don't even extend the courtesy of listening and discussing that. The US government conspiracy theory is a conspiracy theory. The only difference is that the US theory has holes as big as tanks. Two questions no one will answer: 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? Why do you think no one will answer those questions? Answer in the appropriate thread.

The USA continues it evil around the world with hardly a breath between one genocide and another. "More than 5,000 rounds of depleted uranium (DU) ammunition were used in two attacks on Islamic State oil tankers in eastern Syria, the US military has confirmed. The US-led coalition previously pledged it would not use the controversial ordnance." https://www.rt.com/usa/377345-depleted-uranium-isis-syria/ ======================= Last month, the World Health Organisation (WHO) published a long awaited document summarising the findings of an in-depth investigation into the prevalence of congenital birth defects (CBD) in Iraq, which many experts believe is linked to the use of depleted uranium (DU) munitions by Allied forces. According to the 'summary report': Jaffar Hussain, WHO's Head of Mission in Iraq, said that the report is based on survey techniques that are "renowned worldwide" and that the study was peer reviewed "extensively" by international experts. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/oct/13/world-health-organisation-iraq-war-depleted-uranium

Ignore is for children, for chickenshits.

As I pointed out, in your entire time discussing this you made one lame attempt to "discuss". When I pointed out all the things you, the scientist, were ignoring, [like the 6 questions you've ignored repeatedly - very unscientific of you] you got all pouty, like you are doing now. You pout. Scientists don't pout.

Typical science type response for the "scientist".

You aren't a scientist. There has been nothing displayed by you that would warrant such a conclusion. Most everything you have said is unscientific.