hot enough

You seem to have missed the following. That is so unlike a guy like you who is so dedicated to science. "Office fires burn the available fuel and then when it is exhausted, they move on. Temperatures rise in an area and then fall as the fire goes out. No steel in WTC 7 could have been heated to anywhere near the critical temperatures because all the steel was fully fireproofed." No collapse in the Meridian One fire, 18 hours. There were no sprinklers in the Cardington test fires, which had much extra fuel added and they burned until they went out. There was sagging on the totally bare, totally non-insulated secondary steel beams but no collapse.

That is a complete impossibility, Omni, but a non-science guy like you can easily be duped. Office fires burn the available fuel and then when it is exhausted, they move on. Temperatures rise in an area and then fall as the fire goes out. No steel in WTC 7 could have been heated to anywhere near the critical temperatures because all the steel was fully fireproofed. What about the The One Meridian Plaza Fire that burned for 18 hours, and all the other fires that have burned longer and much hotter? Why won't you comment on the pictures that you can see with your own eyes? You also totally ignore the fact that NIST says the collapse was due, not to "7 hours of UNCONTROLLED fires" [which is just hyperbole based on your ignorance of the actual events], but to the failure of one column. That has been shown to be completely impossible by a two year forensic engineering study.

You and your fellow science deniers, who can't even answer easy Yes/No questions about things easily verifiable have never provided ANY evidence to support the conspiracy theory you all struggle desperately, vainly to support, the US Government 911 Conspiracy Theory. Why no video/pictures of the "hijackers"?

Any person with the slightest degree of honesty, even you could do this, Omni, can look at the pictures and see that WTC7, has normal office fires, while the others have much bigger fires. You advance the same nonsense, again, you mouth the memes, without any sourcing when you were asked to do so, when you have been asked to do so myriad times. That is patent dishonesty.

No explanation, no science, no nothing from you guys. You make a mockery of yourselves and Maple Leaf Web.

Still zilch from you, Wilber, providing proof/evidence that supports the US 911 Conspiracy Theory Still zilch from your "science" friends providing proof/evidence that supports the US 911 Conspiracy Theory

Still no proof/evidence that supports the US 911 Conspiracy Theory. While there is volumes of evidence that shows it to be a complete farce, a criminal conspiracy, a murder of thousands of people. And still the science deniers/anti-truthers trot out their lame excuses that they can't even describe in any scientific fashion themselves.

Describe what your video has to do with the three towers being destroyed by nanothermite.

Yet another area where you have no expertise.

Wilber, Omni, DoP: Why didn't any of the raging fires shown in Post ID 84 in all those buildings, some totally engulfed in flame, cause them to collapse, while the normal office fires of WTC7, pictured in the bottom right corner, caused it to free fall? Why no comment on these impossibilities from the "science" gang?

How do you account for NIST's John Gross categorically denying molten steel when there are so many witnesses to it, so many instances of it, eyeball?

How do you account for NIST's John Gross categorically denying molten steel when there are so many witnesses to it, so many instances of it, eyeball? Here's John Gross touching the end of a previously molten/vaporized steel beam/column, "in the steelyards," Yet this same John Gross is recorded as saying, paraphrased, I know of nobody, no eyewitnesses have said so, nobody's produced it, I was on site, I was in the steelyards, ... .

Provide sources for your contentions.

What's "this stuff"? Are you too afraid to read the scientific literature describing all "this stuff"? From the nanothermite that was found in WTC dust. There is no other explanation for this US proprietary, non-commercially available explosive being there. Do you deny nanothermite exists? Do you deny it was found in WTC dust? What do you believe could have caused the huge volumes of molten and vaporized steel? I don't know or understand how a human being can so deny reality, so deny they myriad impossibilities of the US official conspiracy theory. A top forensic engineering professor, after a two year study, says NIST's report of WTC7 has a zero chance of being true. There are thousands of architects, engineers, physicists who describe how NIST's conclusions about all three towers are impossible. 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. How did those unreacted nanothermite particles get into WTC dust? 3. How did those by-products of thermitic reactions that were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust actually get there? 4. How did the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see, come to be at WTC? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum? What POSSIBLY could have caused the molten steel of WTCs 1, 2 & 7?

Address the lie you advanced about taxme. And here are some easy questions for you to illustrate how important science is to you. 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum?

Here's how WTC7 came down, a classic controlled demolition.

This meme of yours illustrates just how ignorant you are on these issues. It is nanothermite. There are no det cords. It's a whole new ballgame. Scientists outside of the government circle don't even know how it is made. This is just typical, Omni, your hatred of science and the scientific process. Science is about honesty and you are the farthest thing from that.

So sneakily, no actually, transparently incoherent, Omni. You excel at this. The "great conspiracy theory" is the US government conspiracy theory, the one that you, no one has provided a lick of evidence for. Prove it, after you address taxme's issue and the 6 easy Yes/No questions.

Prove it, after you address taxme's issue and the 6 easy Yes/No questions.

I answered that. I said I don't know. Do you know? We both know they got it in there because there was nanothermite and the by products of nanothermite in WTC dust. Do you deny that there was nanothermite and the by products of nanothermite in WTC dust? Now it is your turn to address your slanderous comment that taxme's ideas were hogwash. And you can address the 6 easy Yes/No questions you have been studiously avoiding.

Prove what taxme wrote was hogwash, Omni. I've put it all in neat little bundles for you. Given how thorough you are with your attention to scientific detail, this could be a grand learning experience for everyone. True or False with proof/evidence. People can choose one: A. Omni will chicken out as usual. B. Omni will not address a thing. C. Omni will flit around providing as much obfuscation as possible. 1. There was one video on the internet that showed one of the planes wings flying thru a building before it hit one of the towers. 2. Then there were the explosions being heard from firemen on the seen that sounded like explosives going off in the basement. 3. Then the W7 building came tumbling down for no good reason at all except from being brought down by explosives. 4. Larry Silverstein owner of the twin towers was over heard telling a fire chief to "pull it". Someone wanted that W7 building blown up. 5. Then there was a BBC woman reporter reporting that the W7 building just came tumbling down. The only problem here is that the building was still standing up right behind her on camera for all to see. 6. Even before a proper investigation could be done all the debris was immediately picked up and removed from the scene of the crime, and shipped off to China. No investigation could now be done.There is more to this picture then what we have been told.

Still zilch for proof/evidence that supports the US 911 Conspiracy Theory. What a bunch of know-nothings! Some masquerading as scientists.

You were wrong and you simply can't man up. You need saving from yourself.

You think your corny sense of humor can always save you. You were wrong. Be a man, sapper.

Someone should what, help you two read them?