hot enough

Answer the many questions you are too frightened to answer. Why are you asking so many questions whose only purpose is to create diversions for you from addressing the substantitive questions of science? You'll have to ask the real perpetrators of the events of 911. That will come out in court.

Where is your evidence for hijackers, Omni? Where is your explanation for the Murrary Street engine not being the engine type used on the 767-200 that was alleged to have crashed into WTC2? It is, according to independent researchers, used on the Boeing 747. How do you reconcile that huge discrepancy in the US official conspiracy theory?

Why do you think there hasn't been even one individual who has come out and said, "You know, there are an awful lot of really unbelievable inconsistencies in the US government story"? Why haven't you, bcsapper? A. Do you deny that there are many unbelievable inconsistencies in the US government story? 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum?

Why do you think a rule of law country, one that FULLY understands the importance of evidence, would bury that Murray Street engine in a landfill one year before the 911 Commission?

Where is your evidence for hijackers, Omni? Why are you spouting off on wacky theories? Are you afraid to provide evidence? While you are at it, provide evidence for you contention, made long ago, that the twin towers were designed to only take the impact at 250 knots? You've been asked many times and you always flee, like you have always fled from the six easy Yes/No questions that have been provided to so many of you.

You would think, right? But they didn't, it's one more, in thousands of pieces of evidence that shows the official story is bogus. Let's discuss it further. One only has to watch the first 1 and a half minutes for the proof. 9/11 - The Impossible Case of Flight 175

Still no evidence from the science deniers. Why? Here are some easy questions for you to illustrate how important science is to you, Dop. 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum?

What a joke! You can't providence any evidence that hijackers existed. Let's see you deny reality once more by dodging straight science, straight reality. 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum?

Are the original inhabitants/tribes of Africa immigrants? Were slaves brought over to American immigrants, were they considered to be immigrants? Do you even understand the meaning of the word 'immigrant'? Check your own Oxford.

Did you, Boges, and you, Omni, buy into this fantasy too?

Provide proof that the scientific paper describing the US government owned nanothermite being found in WTC dust, by Harrit et al has been refuted.

Still no evidence, OftenWrong, Dop, ... for the US conspiracy theory. Should we start a count of posts where you provide no evidence and create diversions?

It didn't even partially collapse, Boges. But it isn't a perfect comparison to the steel framed towers of 911. That style of building has never, ever collapsed, before or since, from fire. Many of those were hours long, raging fires and some of those buildings are still in service. The 110 stories makes it even less likely to collapse, and impossible to totally collapse, because there was so much stone cold steel, much stronger steel below the impact zones. NO fire induced gravity collapse could ever fall symmetrically, hurling multi-ton sections two football fields laterally, eject steel section upwards, acceleration thru the path of greatest resistance [all those defy Newtonian physics] and for WTC7, not hit by a plane, free fall. IMPOSSIBLE!

Who said anything about "dropping the wrong engine on the street"? You have never paid the slightest attention to anything, frightened as you are of finding out the truth, bcsapper. You can see the engine flying across the sky in the many videos I have posted on this very issue, the ones it seems that you haven't even watched. Would you, an interested citizen with a modicum of science and an interest in the same, like me to post it again?

You can help your position by answering these simple questions, Omni? 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum?

You guys don't even know about these things. You and Omni are operating on rumors, "evidence that's been proven false" and a complete denial of reality. That isn't evidence, Boges, that is conjecture. You have enough on your plate right now.

1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum? Hardly. How long has this thread been open, begging for evidence/proof?

No, it is proven science, peer reviewed science, published science that has never been refuted.

I've provided evidence that shows you were badly duped by the notion that OBL had anything to do with 911. The Taliban asked the US for evidence he was involved in 911. If it was so clear, why did Bush refuse to offer any?

That isn't evidence, Dop, Omni, Wilber, OftenWrong, ... .

Providing proof positive of US developed nanothermite, a product that Arab hijackers had no access to, providing proof positive that it was found in WTC dust along with the by products of such thermitic reactions, providing proof positive of the molten and vaporized steel, of the molten steel flowing out of WTC2 minutes before it was blown up, of the other molten and vaporized metals that jet fuel and office furnishings could NEVER do, isn't "sowing doubt", it is proof positive that the alleged hijackers did not cause the collapse of WTCs 1, 2 & 7.

That doesn't count as evidence, Omni.

You have an awfully low opinion of people in general and yourself, Boges. Aren't you adult enough to discern facts, things illogical, things impossible? How can providing evidence for such a rock solid US conspiracy theory be a "useless venture", Boges?

Yet you aren't concerned about the US government lying to you repeatedly about WMDs, the repeated Osama bin Laden Osama bin Laden Osama bin Laden Osama bin Laden we all heard 15 minutes and on after the first plane hit. You aren't concerned about Rumsfeld's grand lie, fully supported by the master propagandist, Tim Russert? Bin Ladens Cave according to Rumsfeld

No proof was ever offered by the US government even though Bush, Cheney, Powell said it would be forthcoming.