hot enough

Are you lying or are you simply incapable of digesting this stuff? There was a lot of residue, 1500 times normal levels. Not hot steel, Omni, molten steel/vaporized steel. Molten fused concrete and steel, melted steel handguns. You explain why. It's your own fiction you are trying to advance. Do you deny that there was molten and vaporized steel at WTC? Do you deny that there was molten fused concrete and steel? Do you deny that there were melted steel handguns?

Now that is some wacky conspiracy theory, eyeball. No leaks for Gulf of Tonkin, Manhattan Project, The Maine, ... . Even when they are not hidden, they are hidden. Native American genocide, a million slaughtered in Indonesia using techniques even ISIS doesn't know, on death lists supplied by the US. Do you know about it? You can't "salt" WTC dust uniformly with iron microspheres at a rate that is 1500 times normal office dust samples. Occam's razor says exploding nanothermite disperses those infinitely better than some guys "salting" the debris. Doncha think? You can't plant tons of molten and vaporized steel. You can't fuse multi-ton pieces of concrete and steel and plant them. You can't uniformly plant unreacted particles of nanothermite throughout WTC dust. You can't cause a building to fall at free fall speed to trick people. You can't cause buildings to fall at accelerating speed to trick people. And consider that you are only hearing a few of the things that make the US official story look totally bogus? All the people scared shitless about answer questions on 911, from this forum right on up to the top levels. That doesn't twig anything in your brain? But forget all that and focus on the science.

That is hilarious coming from you and your fellow travelers. You asked a number of questions. This thing [?] means a question. Isn't it hypocritical of you not prancing out your "You're off topic" dog and pony routine?

Not hot steel, Omni, molten steel/vaporized steel. Molten fused concrete and steel, melted steel handguns. You explain why. It's your own fiction you are trying to advance. Do you deny that there was molten and vaporized steel at WTC? Do you deny that there was molten fused concrete and steel? Do you deny that there were melted steel handguns?

Only the hypocrites and the liars, Goddess. This should be something a university educated women can think thru for herself. When anyone's country commits war crimes, crimes against humanity and terrorist acts, don't you think moral people should condemn those actions? Are you denying that the US has committed war crimes, terrorism and crimes against humanity? Hells bells, Bush_C delights in these things. From the ridiculous to the ridiculouser. Do you believe police that murder should be retained on the force? Do you believe police that rape women should be retained on the force?

Not hot steel, Omni, molten steel/vaporized steel. Molten fused concrete and steel, melted steel handguns. You explain why. It's your own fiction you are trying to advance.

What case, James? What she?

This is why you are a hypocrite. Because you support nations that have stolen this freedom from hundreds of millions. You know who these nations are so we don't have to go any further than pointing out your stunning hypocrisy.

There is a gigantic difference between my questions and yours. Your's are meant as a grand, but oh so apparently lame, diversion from the crucial questions. It is how you operate. Controlled demolition experts wire buildings for demolition fairly often. If you think you have some expertise in this area, by all means, start a thread and have at 'er. You have been very dishonest about the planes, the towers' design, Steven Jones, and now you are refusing to answer simple Yes/No questions. Why? Six simple Yes/No questions. 1. Do you deny that the US government developed nanothermite in the 1990s? 2. Do you deny that unreacted nanothermite particles were found in WTC dust? 3. Do you deny that the by-products of thermitic reactions were found in WTC dust, iron microspheres in volumes 1500 times greater than that of normal office dust? 4. Do you deny the molten and vaporized steel described by FEMA, pictures of which anyone can see? 5. Do you deny the molten and fused steel and concrete, one named the Meteorite and housed in a 911 museum? 6. Do you deny the molten handguns found and stored in a 911 museum?

You know nanothermite was found in WTC dust. FEMA describes the thermitic reactions that created the eutectic/molten/vaporized steel. There is nothing else but a thermite reaction that could have melted/vaporized the steel. What created the huge volumes of eutectic/molten/vaporized steel? How did US government nanothermite get into WTCs 1, 2 & 7?

Yes, let's get that fact well established, as US propaganda has long been hiding this, even from its own citizens. Typical amoral, backstabbing, treacherous Americans. And FD Roosevelt was also part of it, as were prior presidents that supported powers that were raping and pillaging lands as the US was doing.

Typical amoral, backstabbing, treacherous Americans. Thanks for pointing that out.

Still not one speck of evidence supporting the US government conspiracy theory. Why? The evidence should be overwhelming instead of nonexistent.

Yes, seriously, Argus. And these war crimes and terrorism have only grown. But nice try with another of your trademark diversions.

Correction: Truman started the USA war crimes/terrorism against Vietnam and those continued until the 1990s under all manner of US war criminal/terrorist presidents.

Why do you continue to make a mockery of you as an adult, Omni? Adults don't, should not act in this fashion. You make a mockery of MLW. "Mapleleafweb operates these forums in the hopes that they will promote intelligent, honest and responsible discussion. We encourage you to speak your mind on relevant issues in a thoughtful way."

You can do whatever you choose, but that makes you an anti-science lady, capricorn. Do you still believe in the tooth fairy and the Easter bunny? Why do you suggest that it is me who has put forward the science? I hope you can see how that makes no sense at all.

So say thousands of architects, engineers, physicists, the Univ of Alaska study, with no scientists coming forward to dispute these absolutely fatal to the US government conspiracy theory facts.

You are making a mockery of science, you are making a mockery of yourself, Omni. Nanothermite is NOT a ground down product/explosive! Read the link to the US government scientists. If it was this easy, as you describe above, everyone could make it. Nanothermite was found in WTC dust. FEMA describes the thermitic reactions that created the eutectic steel. There is nothing else but a thermite reaction that could have melted/vaporized the steel.

And there are actually people who believe this drivel.

You didn't answer the question. Do you deny that the US was involved in Vietnam affairs before the time LBJ became president?

But the thing is, additional explosives were found in WTC dust. That is hardly irrelevant. They were described by the scientists in the following peer reviewed paper. Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe Niels H. Harrit*,1, Jeffrey Farrer2, Steven E. Jones*,3, Kevin R. Ryan4, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth2, Gregg Roberts6, James R. Gourley7 and Bradley R. Larsen https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf And we know that it was US government/military nanothermite because the US government/military are the only ones in the world that have nanothermite.

Do you deny that US government scientists developed nanothermite in the 1990s? Do you deny that nanothermite was found in WTC dust?

Do you deny that US government scientists developed nanothermite in the 1990s? Do you deny that nanothermite was found in WTC dust?

Do you deny that US government scientists developed nanothermite in the 1990s? Do you deny that nanothermite was found in WTC dust?