hot enough

It does indeed because it points to the only major problem in the world today, the same problem that there has been for well over a century. The one that has been pounded into your brain, which prevents you from seeing the problem. Castro is a hero to most Cubans. Consider what they, the Cuban people would have had if the US had actually liberated them as promised way back in 1898. Cuba had an economy bigger than Italy. But instead the US raped and pillaged Cuba like it has done to so many countries. Then when the US DICTATOR, Batista, was thrown out the US, the big powerful, benevolent, kind USA put a crippling, genocidal embargo on Cuba. Dictatorships are the only method countries have found that can stop the predacious behavior of the USA.

Do you like war criminals and terrorists who pretend to be liberators yet only install brutal right wing dictators?

The bible has always been "flexible". It has to be to accommodate the incredibly flexible minds people need to believe the crap within.

If crazy Sarah was the prez instead of crazy Trump you, and your conservative cohorts would be front and center defending her nuttiness.

I agree that there is much therein to be found . However, that's much too much for those with the attention span of a gnat.

Here's a video for you, Rue, that you might learn a bit.

The US started the Korean conflict with its usual US terrorism. Korea has a claim to be Korea, not a US puppet. Just as all the myriad countries the US has invaded have/had a right to be their own countries. Why do conservatives always support the world's leading war criminals/terrorists?

Testament to your "judgment" that you don't know or don't care that Trump is the idiot of idiots. Why do conservatives always love idiots. Bush, Reagan, Nixon, ...

The brainwashing leaks out.

Patently false, Rue. Just look at how all you closed minded folks absolutely refuse to look at that science, the facts of 911. Richard Feynman had an open mind. If he were alive, he would be chastising all these cargo cult scientists, and all their closed minded little followers, folks exactly like you all. You all have nothing remotely approaching integrity as regards science. Yours [plural] is nothing but deception and misdirection, avoidance and subterfuge, poor as it is. He said, In general we look for a new law by the following process. First we guess it. Then we compute the consequences of the guess to see what would be implied if this law that we guessed is right. Then we compare the result of the computation to nature, with experiment or experience, compare it directly with observation, to see if it works. If it disagrees with experiment it is wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It does not make any difference how beautiful your guess is. It does not make any difference how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is – if it disagrees with experiment it is wrong. That is all there is to it. R Feynman also said the following, and if he were alive, I doubt very much that this NIST fraud would have ever occurred. He describes NIST's cargo cult science below. Everything NIST did disagrees with science. "There is one feature I notice that is generally missing in cargo cult science. … It's a kind of scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds to a kind of utter honesty — a kind of leaning over backwards. For example, if you're doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid — not only what you think is right about it; other causes that could possibly explain your results; and things you thought of that you've eliminated by some other experiment, and how they worked — to make sure the other fellow can tell they have been eliminated.Details that could throw doubt on your interpretation must be given, if you know them. You must do the best you can — if you know anything at all wrong, or possibly wrong — to explain it. If you make a theory, for example, and advertise it, or put it out, then you must also put down all the facts that disagree with it, as well as those that agree with it. There is also a more subtle problem. When you have put a lot of ideas together to make an elaborate theory, you want to make sure, when explaining what it fits, that those things it fits are not just the things that gave you the idea for the theory; but that the finished theory makes something else come out right, in addition.In summary, the idea is to try to give all of the information to help others to judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgement in one particular direction or another."

Still no science, not a source from Rue. That is the equal of lying, Rue, and you have it down pat.

Evidently, they did. Do you think the top military guy would be saying what he said if there wasn't a valid reason. I don't know myself but I suspect soldiers give up quite a bit to join the communist military in exchange for their brainless acquiescence.

Genocide is far beyond mistreatment. Canada isn't an illegitimate country, Canada is a legitimate genocidal country. All the whining in the world from you, Argus, can't ever change the facts.

"The two groups exchanged words. The man who was carrying the flag said, "You're disrespecting General Cornwallis." " If you can't disrespect Hitler, PolPot, the Queen of England, George Bush, Dick Cheney, Tony Blair, ... you can't disrespect General Cornwallis.

As is usual, Betsy, you are missing everything. There is zero threat to Canada, the US or anyone else but the people of Korea. And that threat is due totally to the terrorism the US has been inflicting upon the people of Korea since before the end of WWII. The US combined with right wing Japanese forces to take over the Korean peninsula. As is always the case, the USA lied its ass off [isn't lying against christian principles?], murdered and raped, tortured ... . Aren't murder, rape and torture against christian principles?

Why do you persist in flailing your ignorance about, bcsapper? Do you understand what "vaporized" steel means, what it entails, what has to happen for that to occur.

The myriad eyewitnesses, for all to read. September 12, 2001-February 2002: Witnesses See Molten Metal in the Remains at Ground Zero A chunk of hot metal being removed from the North Tower rubble about eight weeks after 9/11.[Source: Frank Silecchia]In the weeks and months after 9/11, numerous individuals report seeing molten metal in the remains of the World Trade Center: Ken Holden, who is involved with the organizing of demolition, excavation, and debris removal operations at Ground Zero, will later tell the 9/11 Commission, “Underground, it was still so hot that moltenmetal dripped down the sides of the wall from [WTC] Building 6.” [9/11 COMMISSION, 4/1/2003] William Langewiesche, the only journalist to have unrestricted access to Ground Zero during the cleanup operation, will describe, “n the early days, the streams of molten metal that leaked from the hot cores and flowed down broken walls inside the foundation hole.” [LANGEWIESCHE, 2002, PP. 32] Leslie Robertson, one of the structural engineers responsible for the design of the WTC, describes fires still burning and molten steel still running 21 days after the attacks. [SEAU NEWS, 10/2001 ] Alison Geyh, who heads a team of scientists studying the potential health effects of 9/11, reports: “Fires are still actively burning and the smoke is very intense. In some pockets now being uncovered, they are finding moltensteel.” [JOHNS HOPKINS PUBLIC HEALTH MAGAZINE, 2001] Ron Burger, a public health advisor who arrives at Ground Zero on September 12, says that “feeling the heat” and “seeing the molten steel” there reminds him of a volcano. [NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION, 9/2003, PP. 40 ] Paramedic Lee Turner arrives at the World Trade Center site on September 12 as a member of a federal urban search and rescue squad. While at Ground Zero, he goes “down crumpled stairwells to the subway, five levels below ground.” There, he reportedly sees, “in the darkness a distant, pinkish glow—moltenmetal dripping from a beam.” [US NEWS AND WORLD REPORT, 9/12/2002] According to a member of New York Air National Guard’s 109th Air Wing, who is at Ground Zero from September 22 to October 6: “One fireman told us that there was still molten steel at the heart of the towers’ remains. Firemen sprayed water to cool the debris down but the heat remained intense enough at the surface to melt their boots.” [NATIONAL GUARD MAGAZINE, 12/2001] New York firefighters will recall “heat so intense they encountered rivers of molten steel.” [NEW YORK POST, 3/3/2004] As late as five months after the attacks, in February 2002, firefighter Joe O’Toole sees a steel beam being lifted from deep underground at Ground Zero, which, he says, “was dripping from the molten steel.” [KNIGHT RIDDER, 5/29/2002] Steven E. Jones, a physics professor from Utah, will claim this molten metal is “direct evidence for the use of high-temperature explosives, such as thermite,” used to deliberately bring down the WTC towers. [MSNBC, 11/16/2005] He will say that without explosives, a falling building would have “insufficient directed energy to result in melting of large quantities of metal.” [DESERET MORNING NEWS, 11/10/2005] There will be no mention whatsoever of the molten metal in the official reports by FEMA, NIST, or the 9/11 Commission. [FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, 5/1/2002; 9/11 COMMISSION, 7/24/2004; NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, 9/2005] But Dr. Frank Gayle, who leads the steelforensics aspects of NIST’s investigation of the WTC collapses, will be quoted as saying: “Your gut reaction would be the jet fuel is what made the fire so very intense, a lot of people figured that’s what melted the steel. Indeed it didn’t, the steel did not melt.” [ABC NEWS 7 (NEW YORK), 2/7/2004] As well as the reports of molten metal, data collected by NASA in the days after 9/11 finds dozens of “hot spots” (some over 1,300 degrees) at Ground Zero (see September 16-23, 2001).

Because of the myriad eyewitnesses

You sure do like talking about this sex sex sex! That always the way of christian conservatives, "sex is bad, fire and brimstone, you're all going to hell in a handbasket" until they are found sexually molesting someone.

That's right, "WE" control the narrative totally. By 'we' we all know that means the USA. The greatest liars of all time, the guys who have more false flags to their name than anyone, 'we' trust to run the narrative. Long before the illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, the US/UK was butchering innocents. The US planned the destruction of Iraq's water treatment facilities, knowing full well in advance that it would mean the deaths of potentially millions. That is a war crime of epic proportions. How many of you would have sworn to fight to the death had that been done to you and your kin and friends and countryfolk. Still you mouth the propaganda!

Jesus on a popsicle stick, people are so incredibly gullible. All you have ever heard is US propaganda and you folks are looking under your beds like little children. Have you ever asked yourselves, when did this BS start, who started it, who has been using it to advance their STATED plan for world domination?

After making a number of false statements, for which you were shown to be wrong, why didn't you admit your errors instead of going to this huge self-defense?

My views are totally backed up by historians and the historical record. No one denies it, they just try to excuse it. The USA should not be getting a free ride for its over 70 illegal invasions since WWII and its tens of millions slaughtered. It is even worse for the US because it has always been such a monumental liar about what it really is.

I think you do just fine with your novels and your fantasies. They obviously keep you from addressing reality.